Showing posts with label High Sierra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label High Sierra. Show all posts

11 November 2026

Back to the Future


Noir is a reflection of its time. I think you can argue that Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde is proto-noir, published in 1886, and clearly psychological fiction, even if not characterized as such. But classic noir is identified with the immediate postwar era, from 1945 into the early ‘50’s.

The immediate precursor, both for style and for a gleeful moral ambiguity, is the gangster picture of the 1930’s – Warners the studio that capitalized most heavily on the raw energy of actors like Cagney and directors like Walsh. I couldn’t say where the distinction, or definition, comes into play. The Maltese Falcon came out in ‘41; is it noir, exactly? The Big Sleep came out in ‘46, but Bogart has ration tags on his windscreen, so it dates to the end of the war, not after. The picture most people would agree on is Double Indemnity, released in ‘44. Barbara Stanwyck comes down those stairs? You know Fred MacMurray is toast. My own favorite would be Out of the Past, 1947, which is clearly deep into noir convention, by that point. The exchange on the beach, when Jane Greer tells Mitchum she’s a bad girl, and not to be trusted, and Mitch has the classic comeback, which could serve as the epitaph of so many dumb clucks, from Garfield to Burt Lancaster: “Baby, I don’t care.” (The source novel is Build My Gallows High.)

Kiss Me Deadly, from 1955, is beginning to slide into different territory - a little Them, with its radioactive ants. Cold War noir is genre in itself, culminating in The Manchurian Candidate, or Eddie Dmytryk’s hallucinatory Mirage. Kiss Me Deadly is still pretty relentlessly weird, Ralph Meeker completely unsympathetic, but so determined, and Gaby Rodgers, who didn’t get much traction, after this picture, as one of the more extreme psycho femme fatales of all time. Don’t open the box!

There’s a pretty clear demarcation, between the first Bond, Dr. No, in 1962, and The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, released in ‘65. Ian Fleming knew from derring-do, he’d been a Royal Navy spook, mounting false-flag operations in Nazi-occupied Europe, but Bond was total moonshine. He was also an archetype, predatory and calculating. Le CarrĂ©’s sensibility was a course corrective, unglamorous and weary, and there were quite a few real spy-handlers, in CIA and MI6, who actively disliked the way le CarrĂ© peopled his secret world. They accused him of moral relativism, but it was also so un-Bond, shorn of imperial carelessness.

The noir world is arbitrary and violent. You can draw a direct line between Dick Powell in Murder, My Sweet and Elliott Gould in The Long Goodbye. Powell is more the wiseguy, and Gould the more passive, but they both affect not to care, as if they could let the world go about its business – but they in fact feel it very deeply, hiding an abiding empathy under a veil of scorn. And if I prefer Powell, in black-and-white, it may simply be that his disguise slips when you least expect it. Powell represents his era, just as Elliott Gould does. Powell, or Mitchum, or Bogart – I’m thinking particularly of his astonishing performance in High Sierra – are both brittle and resilient. Gould just seems stoned, half the time, which makes the ending of The Long Goodbye even more shocking. You don’t realize how much Marlowe has invested of himself, until that last moment.

So, what to make of the neo-neo-noir, such as Sicario, or Don Winslow’s border trilogy? You could call it brutish and nihilistic, in keeping with Age of Trump, but it still seems to me inherently conservative, in that a rough justice prevails, a balance is restored. The resolution of Sicario is disturbing in the extreme, and its sequel even bleaker, and yet, as cruel as it is, it’s dramatically satisfying: it sets things right. We may not agree with it, but it brings a kind of order out of dystopian chaos, a reckoning.

My point, here, is perhaps that we get the noir we deserve. If it settles the score, baby, I don’t care.

13 March 2024

The Roaring 20's


Raoul Walsh made some terrific pictures, some of them in fact great.  You can make a good argument for High Sierra, Pursued, and White Heat, but even the movies that aren’t obvious masterworks are pretty damn rousing: They Died with Their Boots On, Gentleman Jim, Colorado Territory, The World in His Arms, The Revolt of Mamie Stover.  He made four features with Cagney, and probably only Wellman, in The Public Enemy, had more to do with shaping Cagney’s screen persona.  He made ten features with Flynn, and while it’s safe to say Michael Curtiz invented the dashing Flynn swashbuckler most of us think of - Robin Hood, The Sea Hawk - it’s Walsh who gets more out of Flynn the actor. 

Another thing about Walsh is that he sets up bits of business that reverberate well past their actual time on screen.  There’s a throwaway gag fairly early in The Roaring Twenties that’s not only one of the coolest things in Walsh, it turns out to be one of the coolest things in the history of the movies.  (Since it’s a visual joke, I can’t really do justice to it, but here goes.)  Cagney meets Priscilla Lane and falls head over heels.  He squires her home on the late train, from midtown Manhattan to someplace out in the sticks, maybe Yonkers. Cagney mutes the trademark Cagney wiseacre, and delivers enormous yearning and charm.  In the end, she’s fated to wind up with the straight-arrow DA instead of the roguish bootlegger, but in the immediate present, you can entertain the same hopes he does.  The moment is suspended, a single note hanging in the air, like the chime of a wineglass, the two of them completely taken up with each other, a private physical space for themselves alone, but keeping a delicate distance, hoping not to break the spell.  They get to the last stop, where she’s going to get off, and he gets off with her, to walk her home from the station – because he’s still not ready to leave the moment behind – and here’s the kicker.  Cagney and Priscilla Lane haven’t been shot in close-up, i.e., a shot of his face, a reverse of hers, an alternating visual dialogue; they’re shot together, over the back of the seat in front of them, so you don’t get the feeling they’re opposed: they’re in the same frame.  Walsh also frames the scene, at the beginning and the end, in a longer shot, that shows the whole carriage, with Cagney and Lane about two-thirds of the way back in the nearly empty car.  Not entirely empty.  Toward the front of the car, closest to the camera, is a passed-out drunk, with his hat over his face.  When the train pulls up, and Cagney and Lane get off, the camera waits behind for a beat, and the drunk startles awake, realizing it’s his stop, and stumbles out of the carriage.  Your laugh breaks the spell.

This scene on the train prefigures Garfield and Beatrice Pearson in the back of the cab in Polonsky’s Force of Evil, and the even more famous scene between Brando and Rod Steiger in On the Waterfront.  You can see its influence in the Coen brothers’ Blood Simple, when the camera tracks along the bar, and bumps over the sleeping drunk, and then settles back down to surface level – instead of effectively dollying through him, because in the convention or conceit of movie-world, the camera takes no notice of such physical obstacles, a wall or a window, a speeding car, a piece of furniture.  The camera, first of all, is omniscient, and secondly, it doesn’t exist in the same physical space as an object or an actor.  It’s a ghost, it isn’t present.

Walsh doesn’t break the Fourth Wall, that’s not where I’m going.  And he doesn’t call attention to himself.  He’s not doing a Hitchcock, inviting you behind the curtain.  He’s very straightforward.  In fact, the story goes that he’d turn his back on a scene, and then turn around and ask his cameraman if it went right, as if he were embarrassed to be a grown man, doing something this stupid to make a living.  But look at the way he sets stuff up, the scaling, the intuitive balance between the epic and the intimate.  Ward Bond has an amazing cameo in Gentleman Jim as John L. Sullivan, the bare-knuckles heavyweight champ that Corbett knocks out in the ring.  He comes, literally hat in hand, to the door of the victory party, and when Corbett asks him in, Sullivan says no.  He’s the past, he tells him, an old punch-drunk palooka with cauliflower ears; Corbett’s the future, what the Irish can aspire to.  The most astonishing thing about it is that you can easily imagine this with Ward Bond, or maybe Victor McLaglen, in the hands of John Ford, and watch it get grossly oversold.  It’s sentimental, but Walsh has the sense not to play it for sentiment. 

Another example.  Custer leaves for the Little Big Horn, in They Died with Their Boots On.  (Even in sympathetic biographies, Custer comes across as a bully, if never a physical coward; Flynn, interestingly, plays him as ingratiating and thick-witted, exaggerating his own least likables.)  It’s the last time Libby Custer will see her husband alive.  (Libby devoted her widowhood to promoting the Custer legend, the golden-haired Achilles of the Plains; she was remarkably successful.  Olivia de Havilland is a sympathetic Libby, but the real woman had ice in her veins.)  The way Walsh shows it, Custer kisses her goodbye and steps away, out of the frame.  The camera draws back slightly, a medium shot, Libby in the lamplight.  She’s standing stiffly, as if posed for a daguerrotype, her eyes wide, her mouth barely parted, one hand resting on the dresser next to her, the other clutched to the front of her dress, and then she crumples, all of a piece.  I think there’s a sudden pulled focus, just as it happens, a quick trick of the lens, that underlines her abandonment, but I’m not quite sure.  It might be something my own eye added.

And the justly famous tracking shot in White Heat, in the prison mess hall, first from right to left - Cagney asking how his mom’s doing, passed down the line of cons to Edmond O’Brien – and then back from left to right – the word that she’s dead, all of it done in pantomime, and then Cagney, zero-to-sixty, batshit psycho in a tenth of a second.  Word is, the scene wasn’t shot as written, Cagney and Walsh set it up without warning the extras, and Cagney took it to the bank. 

The Roaring Twenties was released in 1939, which was one hell of a year for pictures, and you can make a case that it caps the Warner Bros. gangster picture.  It hits all the marks, with plenty of vigor, but the movie’s a swan song for the genre. Cagney personifies this.  The Roaring Twenties is one of his most physical performances.  Mark Asch, in his essay for the Criterion DVD release, points out that he seems to think with his body, that he expresses all his energies and emotions with it, his hands, the balls of his feet, the way his eyes change.  He’s always restless, in motion, checking the threat environment. And as the picture winds down, he loses that intensity, that muscular purpose.  He turns into an old soak, living on memories.  His last gasp, when he comes out of hiding – from the promises he’s made himself – is like watching somebody try on a set of clothes that don’t fit anymore.  In the end, he lives up to his promises.




The Roaring Twenties is out on a new DVD restoration from Criterion, although not available on the Criterion Channel to stream. There’s a halfway decent print on YouTube, even if the subtitles are strange.