09 January 2018

Rest In Peace, Major Crimes

SPOILER ALERT. If you watch the TV show Major Crimes and haven't seen the episodes that aired on December 19th, stop reading and go watch. Then come back.
For nearly thirteen years, I have been invested in the Major Crimes squad of the Los Angeles Police Department--the fictional one, as depicted in two series on TNT: The Closer, which ran from 2005 - 2012, and its spin-off, Major Crimes, which began in 2012 and which will air its final episode tonight. I have loved these two shows because of the writing and the acting, because the audience was allowed to become invested in the characters as well as the cases, and because the people behind the show--until recently--were able to give the audience a good balance of episodes, some serious, other lighthearted. Put simply, these shows made me happy.

But with the final episode just hours away from being aired, I must confess I'm not happy anymore. I'm not happy that the powers behind the cable network apparently put pressure in the last year on the people behind Major Crimes to make the show darker and edgier and to come up with story lines that wouldn't be resolved in a single episode but instead dragged on and on and on.

While I'm okay with overarching character issues that continue throughout a series--seeing Sharon and Andy, for instance, grow from friends to husband and wife--and while I'm okay with larger plot issues that reoccur from time to time (such as the ongoing case involving serial killer Philip Stroh), I didn't like that Major Crimes changed its format recently from having a murder that was solved each week to a murder case that would take several weeks to be solved. Those multiple-episode cases became too hard to follow, and they were all so so dark and serious.

I'm also unhappy because Major Crimes killed off the star of the show, Sharon Raydor, a few episodes ago. It was shocking and heartbreaking and completely unnecessary. When a canceled show goes off the air, I like to think that the fictional characters are still out there, doing their jobs, living their lives. I might not get to check in with them anymore, but in my mind, they are riding off happily into the sunset. But when the main character of a TV show is killed off, there is no happily ever after. There is no joy any longer.

I read a Variety article a few weeks ago in which the amazing Mary McDonnell, who played Major Crimes's star, Sharon Raydor, talked about the decision by the show's executive producer and creator, James Duff, to kill off Sharon. The death wasn't done for shock value or as an F.U. to the network. It appears the decision was made thoughtfully and with the audience in mind. Duff wanted to allow the audience to grieve, and he thought this would be a good-send off for the character. Maybe there are viewers out there who enjoyed this closure. But for me and for every person I've talked to about this, it was a kick in the gut--a major miscalculation. I didn't want grief forced on me. I wanted to believe Sharon and Andy would live happily ever after. I wanted Sharon to continue leading her squad. If I had to put up with the show being canceled, I at least should have been given the ability to believe that everything would continue to be well with all my favorite fictional police detectives. That would have left me satisfied.

All of this agita leads to an interesting question. When a series is ending, be it a TV show or a mystery novel series or any other type of series, how much does the author/showrunner owe to the readers/audience? After nearly thirteen years as a viewer of these two TV shows, I feel ownership of the characters and want them to have a happy ending, as I expect most loyal viewers do. But if I put on my author hat, I realize that my reaction is quite presumptuous. I might be a loyal viewer, but these are not my characters, not my story lines, not my shows. I don't own the copyright. I didn't dream up these dramas. I didn't bring the characters to life. As an author, I own the stories I write, and while I keep my readers in mind as I write, I choose the twists and the endings, and I would be aggravated if readers started telling me that I should craft my stories differently. My stories are mine. So from this perspective, I can understand Duff's desire to end the show on his terms. I just wish his terms weren't so different from mine.

Major Crimes certainly isn't the only series (TV or books) to end on a note that readers didn't like. (And I should add that while I'm unhappy with Duff's choice to kill off Sharon, the episodes since then have been wonderful, and I expect the final episode tonight too will be good.) The final episodes of other shows and books have not been so well received either. The last episode of Seinfeld, for instance, was terrible. Viewers wanted to imagine Jerry, George, Elaine, and Kramer living out their lives in New York, going about their days where nothing happens in an amusing manner. No one wanted to imagine those characters in prison. And when Arthur Conan Doyle killed off Sherlock Holmes, readers were so unhappy, thousands apparently canceled their subscriptions to The Strand magazine, in which the offending story appeared. I read that Conan Doyle wanted to send Holmes off with a bang. But what about what the readers wanted?

It's a hard line for writers to walk, wanting to keep strong to your artistic vision as you wind up a series, yet give your readers/viewers the payoff they want. It must be especially hard when the decisions are made with care, yet they aren't received as expected, at least by some.

So it will be with a heavy heart that I watch the last episode of Major Crimes tonight. I expect that the serial killer Stroh will finally be caught. I expect that justice will prevail. I expect that no other characters in the squad will die. And I expect that no matter what happens in the episode, I will be in mourning as the final credits roll, because these are characters whom I've grown to love, and I'll miss them. And that is something Duff and McDonnell and everyone involved in Major Crimes and The Closer before it can be proud of. It's no small thing to create a world that brings others joy, even if some readers/viewers don't love every aspect of the way the story comes to an end.


  1. Barb, you're post hit a point with me. When I was at my last book launch, I mentioned a new series that was coming out this year (well, book 1 of a new series, The B-Team.) One reader gasped and said, "But Gina isn't married yet!" I was baffled, until I realized that my reader was referring to The Goddaughter series, and thought that since I had a new series coming out, that was it for the old series. I explained that The Goddaughter Does Vegas is coming out in 2019, so no worries. But it made me realize how important our characters are to the audience, and how we want to know they live on to have happiness.
    From now on in my longer-running series, I'm going to make sure to wrap up things with each new book so that if it is the end, readers will be satisfied. Because who knows when a publisher will pull a series.

  2. gak - your!! more coffee needed...

  3. Good intentions, Mel, but it may not be that easy to pull off. If you have character growth in mind, you can't have all that growth happen in one book. It could be too fast. (I'm reminded of Melrose Place back in the mid-90s, when the show went on hyperdrive. The episode that made me give up on the series included Allison meeting someone, falling in love, getting married, him dying, her being accused of murder, and if I remember correctly, her being put on trial and acquitted. That was a season's worth of episodes in one, enough to give you whiplash.)

    Besides, it's nice to let readers think something happy is on the horizon. I've heard of authors self-publishing a final book in a dropped series in order to tie up the loose character ends for the loyal readers.

  4. Your article which interesting and well presented without my thoughs. I become irrate when people complain about anything an author does but I have expectations of a series and an ending that I think of as bad will ruin my whole relationship with the show. On the other hand when I finish a book, that may be my last contact with the characters but most well loved TV shows go to reruns and I want to feel good about the characters an not think what they did to the characters in the end. I do reread some really specials books one the series ends but an ending that I hated might keep me from doing so.

    Ian author I love has not been able to write the last book of two series that I love. There are several reason, most of which we do not know, but I know that she would finish if she could. One book is the first book that has a major character arc but not a real cliff hanger and some "fans" are angry, as if she is making a choice or that she owes us something. I get incensed when someone says she owes us but I would fell that the people behind the series owed us. I guess I need to get a better perspective.

    Jeanie Jackson

  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

  6. Thanks for commenting, Jeanie. Your post made me think of the TV show Medium, which I adored, but the last episode included the death of a major character. As with Sharon Raydor's death, it was heartbreaking and unnecessary. I know one friend who said it ruined the entire series for her, and she couldn't ever bear to watch Medium reruns after that.

  7. Barb, I'm still not sure how I feel about Sharon's death. I was first shocked that the show was canceled and then shocked by Sharon's death. I guess tonight's episode will help me decide. Part of me likes the idea of grieving, which I guess I would have done with just the cancellation. Like you I have read all the articles from the creator and writer. In fact, I just read another today.

    I do wonder if these actors and actresses will show up somewhere else because I do like them all.

    Anyway, I am sadly looking forward to the finale tonight.

  8. We're also saddened at the end of the series. And until just now, I was annoyed at the way it's ending--with Sharon's death then a continuation. But then I realized--the Stroh story is Rusty's story. I'll be glad to see the end of that, but maybe it's cool that he gets his own happy ending? Assuming they end it the way they should. :-)

  9. Well, not a "happy" ending, but maybe a more satisfying one?

  10. I hope to see these actors elsewhere, too, Pat.

    And Bobbi, yes, I hope that all the remaining characters get the happiest ending they can, considering the circumstances.

  11. I didn't like Sharon dying or the show ending. Hard to lose such great characters!


Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>