Mistakes,
I’ve made few, but then again, too many to mention. And more, much more than this, I did it any
way I could figure out.
When people ask me how I’m able to make a certain piece of wood working, the only honest answer is, “A series of mistakes, randomly interrupted by moments of good fortune.” I think the only difference between a person who succeeds at a craft, and one who doesn’t, is
the willingness to try. Failure is not an option, it’s inevitable. A completed project is the result of winnowing the number of mistakes down to a tolerable, and amendable, few. Thus, making mistakes is not as important as knowing how to reorganize the flaws.
For this, the most important
ingredient is humility. When it comes to
craft, we are all born sinners. Accepting
this is the road to endurance and faith that persistence, seasoned by patience
and presence of mind, will see you through.
Some mistakes achieve an unexpected
good. We’ve heard about Velcro, Post-it
notes and microwave ovens, but I have experienced a number of occasions when a colossal
blunder resulted in a far better outcome.
This usually happens when I’ve made my intended effect impossible, so I’m
forced to redesign the whole thing, turning a repair into a pleasing improvisation.
Architects
have known about this for a long time, probably because buildings are so big
and take so long to put together that learning how to glorify a goof was an
important strategy.
Not
unlike building a novel. I’m sure this is
how many of you write. Perhaps it’s the
only way to write anything halfway decent. Anne Lamott’s shitty first draft is actually
an exercise in dispensing thousands of mistakes that call for ingenious
corrections. Our most inventive writers
are probably people who generate mistakes at scale, writing themselves out of
one pitfall after another.
The Grand Master of fortuitous mistakes is nature herself. For every living thing, reproductive success is a numbers game. The reason an individual produces far more eggs or sperm than needed to complete the transaction is it increases the odds for an acceptable match. A byproduct of these multitudes is that little errors creep into the genetic scheme. It’s regrettable that the word “mutation” has a vaguely negative connotation. Truth is, without mutation, we wouldn’t have evolution, since natural selection needs a toolbox of mis-made parts from which to select the preferred attribute for continued survival.
If
you really want to go large on the value of error, whatever existed before the Big
Bang contained tiny quantum fluctuations, deviations from the norm. This meant the universe didn’t start off
perfectly configured, but instead, what cosmologists charmingly describe as
slightly lumpy. This meant that when expansion
created the universe we ended up with galaxies, stars, and planets, one of
which is our current residence.
This is what I’d call a happy
accident.
I’ve recently mentioned the delusion
of perfectionism. Nothing is perfect,
and if it was, it wouldn’t do us much good.
It would just sit there in a smooth slab of static nothingness. It wouldn’t grow, change, evolve or adapt. This doesn’t mean there’s no point in trying
to make things better. You just can’t make them perfect, and neither should you
try.
Say what you will about the advanced technology we live with today, it mostly works. It’s all pretty much based on quantum mechanics, which everyone applies, though no one really understands. If you could boil down the unfathomable complexity of quantum theory, the remaining nugget would be probability. Probably. Outcomes are not predetermined, but rather the consequence of infinite, unknowable and evanescent interactions. Heisenberg proved that “here and now” is ultimately an approximation.
This wouldn’t happen in a perfect
world, but lucky for us, irregularity and imprecision makes the whole thing operational. It’s been built into the system since the first
nanosecond. You might regret a mistake,
but there’s no shame in it. So have at
it. That’s why we have copy editors,
imperfect as they are.

I guess in a perfect world, there would only be one way to tell a story! And how boring that would be. A good reminder, Chris.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Melodie. I like your reference to story telling better than, "There's more than one way to skin a cat," since I've never an inclination to do so.
DeleteIn popular culture, the idea that it's okay to make mistakes is actually quite new. In fact, among all the 21st-centuryisms I deplore, the one I really like is, "Oops!" It sure beats guilt and shame and agonized apologies.
ReplyDeleteThat's an interesting point. I guess our forebearers were saddled with Plato's ideal form, which people like Heisenberg handily did away with. As did the Impressionists, Stravinsky, Joyce, Picasso, et al.
DeleteI used to have a button I occasionally wore when I taught English. "We spend most of our lives in Plan B." The longer I live and the more I write, the more I believe it. One of my favorite teachers was the 10th-grade English teacher who had us doing free-writing back in the early sixties and said, "You can't make something better until you have something terrible to work with."
ReplyDeleteYou were lucky in your choice of English teachers. Especially since you got to pass it along.
ReplyDelete