04 June 2017

Notes from the Underground

by Leigh Lundin

Amtrak Virginia
Virginia and West Virginia are gorgeous
Notes from the underground… so to speak. Notes from a train anyway, this is a stream-of-consciousness about people watching and train spotting, noting little nothings.

I spent the last couple of weeks visiting my brothers, Ray and Glen, and my beautiful niece Paris. It’s hard to believe she’s 31 and so cute and so smart. Also, I give a shout-out to my sister-in-law Pat, the best thing that ever happened to brother Ray.

Dale Andrews and his wife (also named Pat) put me up and put up with me for a few days. We worked on writing together… honestly! Thanks, Pat and Dale!

Riding the Rails

As before, I took the train and as usual, I made sometimes sardonic observations.

Did you know the Walgreens at Union Station, 50 Massachusetts Ave NE, Washington, DC, doesn’t have a pharmacy? Really, it doesn’t. It’s like a Kroger, Winn-Dixie or Safeway without groceries, an Exxon/Mobil without gasoline, a McDonald’s without pulverized bovine protein products.

On the other hand, you might find this sign found in Indiana therapeutic:
Chocolate doesn’t ask silly questions.
Chocolate understands.

Train Trivia

atrium, Union Station, Washington, DC
Washington hosts a classically designed train station, albeit one populated with Greco-Romanesque soldiers once totally nude. Prudish politicians demanded the naked thrust of the sculptures be hidden so as not to ruin the morals of an entire nation. Elected officials insisted upon covering the nakedness of the many sculptures, much like Bush’s Attorney General John Ashcroft spent $8000 to cover the b-b-bare b-b-bosom of Lady Justice at the DoJ. A century ago, Washington’s elected spent even more to hide the n-n-naked protruding bits behind strategically placed shields. To be fair, the Obama administration did not undrape the Spirit of Justice. Only in America, once draped, never undone.

The variety of railroad stations around the nation is inspiring. New York, Chicago, Washington feature stations with the elegant architecture of a bygone era. Many small towns throughout the country take pride in their period buildings reminiscent of the 1880s. Ever-practical Richmond, Virginia strives for the coldest, hardest, most obnoxious, move’em-out depot this side of livestock cars.

Amtrak waiting area, Indianapolis
Amtrak Indianapolis as imagined by HR Giger
original © TrainWeb.org
The Indy City

Indianapolis asked itself what hadn’t been attempted before. City officials said, “Dreary, let’s try dreary. Think H.R. Giger or say Blade Runner on a cheerless day with oily rain. Instead of marble and classic statuary, let’s greet passengers with steel beams, rivets, and institutional tile that will always look dated.”

To be clear, I’m not talking about the beautiful, artful refurbished Union Station converted to a shopping mall and Crowne Plaza Hotel shown below. We’re talking about the loud, ghastly functional Amtrak waiting room at right where the desperate spend as little time as possible.

Indianapolis Union Station
What was, what should be.
Photographs of the original mid-1800s Indianapolis train station show a brick building with a clock tower, not unpleasant at all. But like other cities, Indy found rumbling rail crossings interfered with bustling street traffic. Cities like New York and Washington routed trains underground, or at least beneath city streets. Indianapolis chose to elevate tracks above street level.

Passengers in the waiting room can’t escape a claustrophobic awareness they’re sitting under tons and tons of moving steel. This surely contributes to an oppressiveness and possibly a superfine grey dust that works its way into grout and grime. Would it kill the city to paint the interior once in a while?

Tender in the Moment

Like other stations, Indy selects plastic and metal bucket seats designed to make waiting as uncomfortable as possible. Passenger victims innovate ways to rest in this chamber of the restless.

Among the detainees was an eldery couple. Although the woman wore no bindi, something suggested India, Bangladesh or perhaps Pakistan.

The man stretched out across four of the miserable bucket seats, padding it with coats where he could. He positioned a hat to block the worst of the harsh lighting.

The lady tucked a blanket around his shoulders. Restless, she flitted around the terminal, checking schedules, gazing through the window of the garish sundries gift shop. Every few minutes she floated back and leaned in close to her husband. She smoothed his collar, tipped his hat to better shield his eyes, brushing the hair of his temple, whispering and holding his hand to her cheek.

Charmed, I realized I hadn’t seen such tender affection from an older couple in decades. My parents had been very affectionate, but when had I last seen such adoring compassion? The hippie days perhaps… Has couples’ fond gentleness gone out of style? I have occasionally witnessed devoted moments between East Asian couples but why has gentle affection nearly disappeared from American society?

It’s tempting to posit notions about political pop-culture dismissal of public affection, pseudo-personal Hallmark cards, or an end-product of modern feminism. Maybe all of these or none, but I miss the private endearments that once graced couples, especially older couples.

Car Characterization

One afternoon found me sitting at a food court eating those calories such places serve. A young family sat across from me. The little boy tore around the food court, exuberantly demonstrating the H in his ADHD.

The little girl wore pink and carried a pink water bottle. Her little tennis shoes sported glitter embedded in the plastic. Typical little girl, right? Except she was playing with toy cars, pushing Hotwheels nose to nose, and chattering to herself.

Whilst musing, I heard the little girl say the words ‘sugar and cream’ and I paid more attention. The scraps of conversation I caught went something like this:
Hotwheels cars
Car 1:  Do you like tea or coffee?
Car 2:  Coffee sounds good.
Car 1:  Did you hear about Jessica? I’m so mad at her.
Car 2:  No, she’s not nice.
Car 1:  Would you like sugar for your coffee?
Car 2:  Thank you, Lily. I’d love milk.
Car 1:  (apparently named Lily) Have a cookie and a cocktail.
Car 2:  Oh, thank you. Could I have one for Baby Justin?
To my eye, the Baby Justin car looked about the same as Lily and her automotive friend, but I had to admire an imagination that anthropomorphized toy vehicles in a tea party. One could almost picture a Disney movie titled… what should we call it… Cars?

The scene reminded me of remarkably similar classic cartoons by Cathy Guisewite and Garry Trudeau. In his Doonesbury comic strip, Trudeau summed up the results of gender-neutral toys, a concept from the 1970s. Two mothers chat while in the background, a boy plays with a rag doll and a cooking pot. One mother tells the other she’s committed to gender-neutral toys for her son. The other mother asks how that’s working out. In the final panel, the boy is wearing the cooking pot like a battle helmet and has stretched the doll to resemble a machine gun, going “Rat-at-at-at-at-at.”

The Rest of the Room

Speaking of gender, I feel chagrined, mortified on behalf of males for women train travelers. When less than sober, staggering, weaving males are not at their best in restrooms, and rail travel is all about staggering and weaving. I’m willing to accept responsibility for 75-80% of…
Already I hear an objection… only 80%?

Yes, because I know about the hover.

Men are looking at one another asking, “The hover? What the hell’s the hover?”

Women are on phones, texting, calling, emailing… “He knows about the hover? Who told him? How does he know? How many guys has he told? Do we let them live?”
Wait, wait, no violence please. My solution calls for single-use disposable toilets. After each flush, the so-called comfort station is immediately ejected and a new WC slid into place. A mechanical compactor crushes the ejected loo, kicking it to the side of the rails to be later collected and melted down for recycling. Awesome.

Kindly vote whether this brilliant proposal should be enacted into law.



Proposition 441

Disposable Restrooms

(34 503 281)             (2)




15 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE HOVER...! You are not funny... he he he. 1 vote for me!

Paul D. Marks said...

Leigh, as long as you didn't run into Guy Haines and Bruno Antony on the train it was probably a pretty good trip...

O'Neil De Noux said...

Disposable restrooms? Cool idea. We could hover nearby and when a dispicable person goes in, we can push the button and they will be sent to an area where they need to be.

Leigh Lundin said...

Ha! Sandy. It only has to be true.

Oh, Paul. You made me think of Colonel Klebb with her pointy little shoes. SHE was scary!

O'Neil, that's a new take on the outhouse. Man, the crime stories that could be written about that!

Elizabeth said...

We have a lovely anatomically correct copy of Michelangelo's David a couple of miles from where I live. Evidently it's one of many such copies ... here is a tasteful photo of it.

http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WMJMY_Michelangelos_David_Buffalo_NY

Eve Fisher said...

They tried to drape the David here over the years with diapers and a fig leaf; but the solution was to put him in an obscure park, butt to the street. Nobody's bothered by butts, just the naughty bits.

Ah... the hover. And the weaver... Vote yes for me!

B.K. Stevens said...

Interesting post, Leigh, touching on a range of topics. When our grandson was born, our daughter and her husband were determined to avoid sexual stereotyping when it came to toys, to give him dolls as well as trucks, play tea sets as well as Legos. So he played with the trucks and built everything from rocket ships to dinosaurs with the Legos, leaving the dolls and tea sets virtually untouched. That's okay. He has three younger sisters now, and they like the dolls and tea sets just fine. (The older two like Legos as well, though, and I'm guessing the youngest also will when she gets old enough for toys with small parts. Their father's an engineer, after all--it's in their blood.)

Leigh Lundin said...

Elizabeth, good for Buffalo. I gather citizens haven’t run amok since it was installed. By the way, in the ‘long description’ (there could be a pun there), what do they mean by ‘proper’ when referring to the hands?

Eve, sometimes I think there are more fig leaves from sculptures than from trees. The ‘weaver’… uh-oh! Dare we ask what that might be?

Bonnie, that’s funny. What darling kids. On a side note, I recall a television interview of a mother who was opposed dressing girls in pink… except her toddler was adamantly insistent she wanted frilly pink.

A documentary many years ago featured a family with two girls. I don’t recall if they were twins, but they were close in age and complete opposites. One girl dressed and decorated her room in pink, while her sister wore short hair, dark colors and decidedly unfeminine clothes. The parents wisely left them free to make their own choices.

By the way, there’s an Easter egg of sorts in the terminus photo of Indianapolis. Click on it for more detail.

Steve Liskow said...

Great post, Leigh.

Not sure what part I liked most, but the compassionate chocolate (should that be a band?) is high on my list.

Draping the sculptures should be undone. It's beyond the statue of limitations, isn't it?

Leigh Lundin said...

Statue of Limitations… too funny, Steve.

A Broad Abroad said...

How I envy you the train journeys.

The most beautiful stations I've ever seen are those on the Moscow underground - each a work of art.

Art Taylor said...

Catching up after being away, and loved this post! We're big fans of train travel ourselves.

Leigh Lundin said...

ABA, I've seen photos of the Moscow underground stations, but haven't (yet) visited.

Art, thanks. I'm kind of torn regarding high-speed rail. On the one hand, it's nice traveling as fast or faster than flying might take you, but I also like the slow, scenic rides.

Dixon Hill said...

Really enjoyed this, Leigh. Particularly the girl with the tea drinking cars.

Oddly, I spotted the egg first time through, but thought it was just an oddly shaped trash can and that the train had a bizarre paint job. Didn't see what was really going on 'till I went back and clicked. Then I roared! Thanks!

Leigh Lundin said...

I'm glad you liked that, Dixon. It took a little work but it was fun.