I like mysteries and thrillers where the good guys win and the bad guys lose. I think this is true for most readers. I know there’s a market for noir stories that end up ambiguously, or with evil overcoming earnest virtue, but I’m not interested in that stuff. I find it depressing, or vaguely sociopathic. And no fun whatsoever.
That happy endings are far more
common than stories with decent people being ground into dust suggests that most people are
inherently good, because they want stories that reinforce their beliefs and
hopes for humankind.
This is my happy thought and I’m
sticking with it.
I know that evil exists in the world
and that bad things happen to good people all the time. I don’t need books I read as escapism to
remind me of that. I really don’t know
the ultimate score card of good vs. evil – who’s had the upper hand,
historically. But since, despite our
travails, the world has evolved mostly to the betterment of the human population,
a reasonable guess is that the good guys have the edge.
Movie
critics seem to think there’s something intellectually deficient in a person
who prefers happy endings. This explains
why so many Scandinavian movies are critically acclaimed. As if dreary settings, low light, crystalline
ice hanging off scruffy beards and babies frozen in the snow delivers some
deeper understanding of the human condition.
If that’s so, they can have it.
I can imagine some thinking, “Life isn’t just a Disney movie.” Have you seen Dumbo or Bambi lately? Old Yeller? You want to talk about grim and depressing. And Walt wasn’t even Scandinavian, as far as I know.
Moral ambiguity is another thing,
though how it resolves decides the question for me. In The Maltese Falcon, the most
important modern detective novel, spawning the subsequent Bogart movie, we
really don’t know where Sam Spade comes down on the probity scale until the
end. I and others have maintained forever
that Hammet was richly influenced by Hemingway’s anti-heroes – cynical lads
with robust vices who only reveal their essential morality when the drama
starts to wrap up. (The best movie
version of this ethic is Casablanca, another film with Humphrey Bogart.)
It’s sort of a triangulation. Good and evil can only be explicated in
opposition to each other. The third
point in the diagram is how one feels about what’s being contested. The pessimists who want to be affirmed by
evil’s triumph, and their cousins who delight in destruction and despair, have
plenty of stuff out there to enjoy. Have
at it. It’s just not for me. I reject the notion that this work represents
the full extent of our experience on earth, that it reveals some regrettable,
but inevitable reality. Or that this
sensibility conveys upon the believer some greater intellectual facility,
suggesting people like me are too dim witted to appreciate the underlying
certainty of a dark existence.
Just for the record, I’m also not a
fan of pure Pollyanna. I find it treacly
and nauseating. Everyone but me and a
small, surly coterie of old curmudgeons loved the Barbie movie. Ick.
While I cleave to the belief that humanity tilts toward the positive, at
least in our hopes and desires, unfettered optimism is delusional. The facts on the ground say there are
nuances, and lots more grey than black and white, and that every day is a
contest that requires clear thinking and resolve.
As a musician for most of my life, I’ve had the privilege of playing a lot of the blues. I think underlying these compositions is a way to navigate the teetering balance of suffering and joy. Bad things happen, which you have to face up to, but then again, there are other things along the way that can lift your spirits, even in the midst of pain. The texture of the music itself reflects the mood of this conflicted sentiment. It’s soulful, but fun, inspiring sorrow and contentment in equal measure.
“If it wasn’t for bad luck, I
wouldn’t have no luck at all”, according to Albert King, who still managed to
wink at us through the lament.
As I read this post, I am reminded that it is Stormy Monday. The good news is that Tuesday is just as bad, and Wednesday is worse.
ReplyDeleteImagine a "thumb's up" emoji.
DeleteChris, my post this month (4th Sat) is along a similar vein. I don't want to be depressed at the end of a book. I want hope. And yet, in Canada, I find the more dismal a work, the more merit is ascribed to it. Particularly re awards. It makes me even further sad!
ReplyDeleteThis is why I like the awards that are decided by readers or conference goers. Evens the playing field.
DeleteI'm with you, Chris. That's why I quit reading Cormac McCarthy after "The Road". No, no, no... I want not necessarily a happy ending, but a GOOD ending, where goodness triumphs in some important way, and evil gets the living **** kicked out of it.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you all the way. Though I make an exception for Jim Thompson, who's darkness and nihilism is served up with a sense of humour and brilliant prose.
Delete