22 January 2013

Location, Location, Location

I was at a house-warming party a few days ago when I was confronted by someone who had read my book, "The Thirteenth Child".  He had had a few drinks and wanted to correct me on a bit of geography in a particular scene.  "You can't walk from the railroad tracks to the bay," he assured me.  "No street runs from the tracks all the way to the bay."
First of all, let me go on the record as being both surprised and pleased that this fellow had read my book.  "So this is the guy..." I thought.  I had been hoping to meet him and shake his hand.  But, he wasn't in the mood for handshaking, he wanted an explanation.  How could I be so stupid?

"Well," says I, "it's not this town, it's 'Wessex Township'--I made it up."

Now he gives me a look from under his eyebrows--oh yeah?  "Then how come the main street is called Mechanic Street just like here?"

I took another sip of my drink.  I was kind of enjoying this.  "It isn't," I corrected the Guy Who Had Read My Book, "It's Mercantile."  Hah! 

He kind of deflated a little at that.  "Oh...I guess I read that wrong."  He avoided me the rest of the evening. 

That'll teach him to read my book. 

But it didn't escape me that a fellow citizen had recognized what he thought was home in my book's setting.  In all fairness, the location of the book was very closely modeled on the town I (and he) live in.  In fact, I had a lot of fun recreating my little bit of heaven into a setting for dark and horrible things.  And it saddened me when my editor demanded I thin out the dense forest of words describing it.  Even so, my former fan had seen exactly what I wanted; after all, if he hadn't, I would have failed an important litmus test in creating the location.  The only reason I didn't make it my own town (as I explained to the disappointed man) was that I would have then been tied too tightly to the actual geography, and I didn't want that kind of restriction.  Though I was drawing heavily from reality, I was at the same time creating someplace completely unique.

Location certainly plays a huge role in literature.  Sometimes it's almost another character: a supporting actor without dialogue.  Read Janice Law's "Fires Of London" if you want an example.  Brilliantly done descriptions of London during the Blitz; never labored or lengthy (But this is only one example of brilliance in Janice's novel--there are many, many others.  If you haven't read it, you owe it to yourself to do so.).  Novel-length fiction allows writers a large canvas on which to paint their scenes and settings; short fiction generally requires a few deft strokes to evoke atmosphere and location.  Both disciplines are demanding.

I've always enjoyed certain authors for their ability to evoke time and place, Graham Greene being one of my favorites.  He traveled the world in his lifetime and spent a great deal of time in foreign lands; seldom as a tourist.  His novels certainly reflect this.  Had anyone written a major work on Haiti prior to "The Comedians"?  Who knew of Viet Nam before the "The Quiet American"?  I could go on, but you get the point.

Location is sometimes a destination, sometimes home.  Every character has to either live somewhere, or be someplace else.  Where he or she is located is often a key part of the plot.  Even the journey to arrive at someplace must become a setting in a story.

Even as I write this, a comment by Eve Fisher on a post by R.T. Lawton (also excellent at foreign and exotic locales) mentions Cecelia Holland, reminding me of another author gifted at creating a sense of place.  In her case, however, the places are seldom, if ever, within her lifetime, and therefore experience.  She is one of the best of those writers who pen the bewilderingly labeled "Historical Fictions".  Her novels have recreated settings in medieval Mongolia (thus providing the connection to R.T.'s blog about the Mongolian New Year observance), England on the fateful eve of the Battle of Hastings, and the Iceland of two feuding brothers at the close of the Viking era.  No easy feat these things.  Not only must she convince us of the verisimilitude of the land she has invited us into, but she must also convincingly portray a time, and a people, that she could only know through research.  When I think of the Man Who Read My Book's objection over the placement of a single street in a fictional town, I quail at the prospect of attempting what Cecelia Holland and Janice Law have both accomplished in their various works.  Even Graham Greene always wrote in contemporary terms.

Have any of you reading this ever placed a story in a locale that you have never visited or lived in?  Though I have been fortunate in my life to have traveled a great deal, I will admit to having practiced this in a story or two.  But, I won't say which ones.  So far, I've never been caught at it.  In my defense, I did do a heck of a lot of research prior to attempting them.  But in the overwhelming number of cases, my stories don't stray far from the towns, states, and countries of which I have, at least some, personal knowledge.

Robert Ghirardi, another favorite writer of mine adept at evocative description, said in an interview (and I'm taking the liberty to paraphrase here as I can't locate the article) that modern authors are too bound by what they have personally experienced.  He was referring to the strictures placed upon the imagination in this age of near-instant knowledge through the internet and its children.  Any deviation from what is generally known can be instantly fact-checked, making fiction writers cautious to stray too much from what they either personally know or can confirm.  The only safe way to do that is delve into the realm of fantasy, which it seems, more and more authors are doing.  It is also one of the fastest-growing genres in terms of readership, which might be a result of the dearth of truly "exotic" locales in our steadily shrinking world.

Be that as it may, location, exotic or prosaic, provides the canvas upon which we paint our stories, and our success at doing so is as important to our characters as it is to our readers.  Would we accept Hamlet as a gloomy Jamaican?  Wouldn't Sherlock Holmes have been a very different person as a product of 1880's Mexico?

Finally on the subject of location, I have an upcoming story in Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine called, "Murder Town," that is set in the Yucatan.  I'm not going to tell you whether I've been there, or based the setting solely on research--I'll leave that up to you to decide.  Either way, I hope I got it right.       





  1. David, when I began reading, I feared you'd come too close to the subject of my next blog which is "And Where Is THAT?" Thankfully, yours is related but not close enough to make me rewrite mine. Enjoyed your story of The Man Who Read Your Book. I've had a different experience such as, "I've been to St. Mary and we went to Surcie Island." In my case, like your town in THE THIRTEENTH CHILD, St. Mary and Surcie are fictitious.

  2. Congratulations on your upcoming story and thanks for our kind words.
    I share your admiration for Graham Greene's picture of Vietnam. Would more policy makers had read that at the time!

  3. I'm glad I didn't send you back to the drawing board, Fran, and I look forward to reading your take on the subject.

    Thanks, Janice, and my words were heartfelt--it is easy to praise that which is good.

  4. I just finished Fires of London--Janice, it was displayed right next to the cash register at the Mysterious Bookshop during the MWA National Board party. Wonderful evocation of the Blitz--and how different from the last excellent Blitz books I read, Connie Willis's Blackout and All Clear. Some times and places particularly lend themselves to fiction, and every author's vision is different, whether or not they've been there in physical reality.

  5. One master of this was the late Edward D. Hoch, who wrote more than 900 stories, many for EQMM: "I’ve never visited most of the places I write about, but I rely heavily on the Internet and guide books, especially ones with good maps and street photographs." (I'm quoting him from this interview: http://www.mysteryfile.com/Hoch.html).

    On the other end of the spectrum was Robert Ludlum, who I once heard in a radio interview say he had the largest collection of bad photographs in the world. He took tons of pics in his travels and relied on them to build his fiction.

  6. David, thank you for mentioning Cecelia Holland, one of my favorite and (IMHO) best historical fiction writers. (Not to dismiss Hilary Mantel's brilliant work in "Wolf Hall" and "Bring Up the Bodies".) Imagination is still the best means of transportation through time and space, isn't it?

  7. You are right to mention Ed Hoch, Joe--I believed (based on his stories varied settings) that he was extremely well-traveled, and was shocked, shocked, I tell you, when I discovered this not to be true. Ed is an excellent example of the creative person as researcher.

    My pleasure, Eve. I've read dozens of Cecelia Holland's books--love'em.

  8. David, thanks for the favorable mention. Research, maps and the assistance of friends who have been there are great aids for story locations you haven't personally visited. After that, a certain vagueness or careful generalizing helps.
    Leigh was kind enough to e-mail introduce me to a friend of his in France who helped me with a location for my 5th story in my 1660's Paris Underworld series currently in AHMM's slush pile. And conversations with my Chinese neighbor (as frequently translated by his Chinese wife) helped me sell a standalone set in the Golden Triangle to AHMM last November.

    And, to Janice: Just in case you weren't aware of it, in EQMM's February 2013 issue, Steve Steinbock gave a very positive review of your book FIRES OF LONDON on page 86. Great.

  9. My pleasure, R.T. Now, as to the matter of renumeration we discussed...


Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>