I was in Long Beach, California back in mid-November for Bouchercon, the
International Mystery Convention. Attached is a photo of the
SleuthSayers who were in attendance: Rob, Eve, Melodie, and
Brian. R.T. was apparently demonstrating his skill at disguise.
Bcon - four days of 2000 readers and writers - is overwhelming, so I
don't know what to cover. One highlight, new to me, was Speed
Dating. A continental breakfast was provided. You picked
yours up, sat at one of about seventy tables and every five minutes a
bell rang. When it rang two writers would trot over to your table
and each would have two minutes to explain why you wanted to read their
book. I definitely copied down some names for future
purchase.
But my favorite parts of the Dating event were two: Lisa Fernow describing her book as "sexy cozy." Doesn't that exactly
capture it? And Michael H. Rubin was able to rattle his elevator
speech off so perfectly that it was as if a trained actor was reading
it off the book cover. He got applause at every table.
Another highlight for me was the panel "Short but Mighty," in
which I discussed short stories with Travis Richardson, Barb
Goffman, Art Taylor, Paul D. Marks, and Craig Faustus Buck.
During a discussion of Plotters versus Pantsers (do you plot or fly by
the seat of your pants?) Barb Goffman took a firm stand: "I'm a plantser."
Plus I got to chat with my two of my favorite editors, Linda Landrigan and Janet Hutchings, and meet another: Andrew Gulli.
And I have to admit it was a great joy to pick up my Derringer Award (as I'm sure Melodie would agree). Thanks to everyone at the Short Mystery Fiction Society for making that possible. If you want to hear my brief acceptance speech, here it is.
As you probably know, I love a good quote, so I will leave you with a bundle from Bcon. Each was copied feverishly into my
notebook at the time so I apologize to anyone whose words I
garbled. Some of the quotations would benefit from context, but I am not
going to give you any. Here's why.
By the time you are halfway through a Bouchercon you are so overstimulated that everything seems out of context. (Notice our picture above seems a little blurry? That was taken on the last day and we really were blurry.) So consider this an accurate reenactment of the experience. Enjoy.
"All great novels are mysteries." - Sharon Fiffer
"Short stories exist only to stun you." - Jeffrey Deaver
"Does this novel make me look fat?" -Mara Purl
"I write short stories for the purpose of procrastination." - Craig Faustus Buck
Moderator: How do you avoid cliches?
Brad Parks: I take it one day at a time.
"This
is a really British novel. Not cute British. The other
British. Everyone's got a bad cough and a brown couch." -
Catriona McPherson
Waitress: So you're with the mystery convention! Are you writers or readers?
Steven Steinbock: We are all murderers.
"I got a letter that said 'are you retired or are you dead?'" -Thomas Perry
"I have a short attention span. I'm like a goldfish on cocaine sometimes." -Jay Stringer
"Nonfiction is about facts. Fiction is about truth." - Mara Purl
"I'm the wrong person to ask about that, but I'll answer it anyway." - Steven Steinbock
"If my story featured a hemophiliac it would take place in a razor blade factory." - Simon Wood
"Put him down for a whimper, not a bang." - Brian Thornton
"The story is not the plot." -David Rich
"Westlake said to the movie producer: 'If
you don't like the book why did you buy it? Do you want to punish
it?'" - Thomas Perry
"Don't kill your darlings. Just lock them in the basement." - Jon McGoran
"Panelists, do you have any questions for the audience?" - Kevin B. Smith
"Everyone's in the cake. No one's in the frosting." - Seth Harwood
"You don't choose your obsessions. They choose you." - Jodi Compton
"I'm not ashamed to say I write to a
formula. We don't get into a car that hasn't been designed to a
formula." - Jeffrey Deaver
"Good storytelling requires that you be a good listener." - Steve Steinbock
"I had ethics in those days." - Thomas Perry
"I'm going to turn it over to the crowd. They're dangerous because they're hungover and they're punchy." - Claire Toohey
Craig Faustus Buck: How many lungs do you have?
Max Allan Collins: How many do you need?
Next time: the odd phenomenon of books, those flat dead tree things, at Bouchercon.
03 December 2014
Short thoughts from Long Beach
Labels:
awards,
Bouchercon,
derringers,
Lopresti,
quotations
02 December 2014
Early Christmas Present: A Short Story
by Jim Winter
Hey, all. Jim here. On my blog, I have a feature called Get Into Jim's Shorts, where I run a new short story every month. This being Christmas, I went with a seasonal theme. As an early present, I'm going to share this month's story here as well. So without further ado…
To Frank’s
surprise, the Santa suit did not keep him warm. Willowbrook, along with the
rest of Musgrave County, lay under two feet of snow. While Sunny Acres did a
good job plowing and salting the lot, it did not keep Frank from freezing his
nuts off in the get-up. No worries. He planned to knock off about ten trailers,
all double-wides, before the Virgin Mary gave birth over at the Methodist
church.
SUNNY ACRES CHRISTMAS
Frank knew
he had exactly four hours to clean out Sunny Acres Trailer Park on Christmas
Eve. He figured an hour for people to grab dinner and make their way to
Willowbrook Methodist Church, an hour for the first act of the annual Christmas
pageant, half an hour for intermission (cake and punch in the church basement
during a meet-in-greet with Joseph, Mary, and the Angel of the Lord), one hour
for the second act, and half an hour before the faithful returned home. In the
meantime, his name was not Frank.
He was
Santa Claus. The idea came from seeing Jim Carrey in How the Grinch Stole Christmas a couple of weeks earlier. Only
Frank’s idea was better. The Grinch had a dog. Frank had a 1998 Crown Victoria
with a huge trunk and only minor engine problems.
The job, of
course, could not begin until Amon Yoder, the police chief, left with his wife
and kids piled up in their aging minivan. On Christmas Eve, the Willowbrook
Police Department shut down, leaving the Sheriff’s Department to patrol the
town. That meant the deputy who drew the short straw would park his cruiser
downtown and keep an eye on the storefronts until about midnight, when his
overnight relief would simply make a few passes on their way through town. But
until Yoder and his family drove out to the Cracker Barrel on Route 20, Frank
had to stay hunched down out of sight, eyes peering through the steering wheel
with endless Christmas music playing on WJLB.
By 6 PM, half
the trailer park had emptied. The other half – the heathen half, Frank had come
to call them – were getting blissfully drunk on Big Muskie beer and watching
whatever movies they’d seen a dozen times before on Christmas Eves past. No one
would notice Frank trudging about Sunny Acres in the dark.
They would
notice Santa.
He picked
the locks easily enough. Had it not been for a four-year stretch in Mansfield,
he might have made a decent living as a locksmith. More than one cop had given
him a pass if he promised to use his powers for good instead of evil, but one
day, that luck ran out.
“Yeah,”
said Frank, muttering as he worked a particularly stubborn lock, “you try to
make a good living without that badge, motherfuckers. Fucking Nissan moving,
switching their brake supplier to Mexico.”
As the door
swung open, he stepped inside, turned on the lights, and bellowed “Ho! Ho! Ho!”
in as deep a voice as he could muster. He’d been practicing all week as a
shopping mall Santa in Milan since Thanksgiving. When no one responded “Who’s
there?”, he opened his sack, swept as many of the presents from under the tree
as could fit, and headed back out, locking the door behind him. Frank, after
all, was a thief, not an asshole.
On his
third house, he almost did not get the door locked. Whoever lived there kept a
huge Doberman. In the dark, the dobie looked like a beast from Hell. As he ran
from the double-wide, the dog still barking loud enough for anyone in the
neighboring trailers to hear, he wondered what idiot kept a dog that big in a
home that small?
He moved
onto the fourth trailer, a single-wide going to seed in this otherwise neatly
kept trailer park. The old lady who lived here was the church organist. He knew
her husband had left her a bundle, which she stretched by living in a dump like
this. Nonetheless, she had lots of grandchildren who would want lots of presents.
Frank could pawn those presents for hundreds if he were discreet enough. He
filled his sack, locked the door, and headed back to the Crown Vic across the
road. Six more trailers, he told himself. Empty the sack, hit six more
trailers, and he could go have a beer at Mort’s out on Ashland Pike.
As he
trudged back out of the park, his feet freezing, he heard a small voice call
out to him. “Hi, Santa!”
The girl,
no more than six, wore pink feetie pajamas and had her blonde hair in pig
tails. She stood on the tiny porch of her family’s single-wide under a naked
bulb.
Frank
slowly raised his hand. “Uh… Hi?”
“Whatchu
doin’, Santa?”
“Um…” He
realized he needed to go into Santa mode or this kid would think something was
wrong. “Ho! Ho! Ho! I’m taking these presents out to the sleigh to be
inspected. Ho! Ho! Ho!”
The little
girl jumped up and down, clapping her hands. “Is Rudolph out there?”
“Why, no,
little girl. Rudolph retired. He trains the newer reindeer now.” He’d made that
story up on the spot one Saturday as some brat sat in his lap telling him
Rudolph wasn’t real. “What’s your name, little girl?”
“Taylor,”
she said. “Taylor Mills. You know that, Santa.”
“Well, I
don’t have my crystal ball with me.”
“Crystal
ball?”
“How do you
think I see you when you’re sleeping and know when you’re awake? Ho! Ho! Ho!”
He needed to get this kid back in the house or three trailers would be all he
hit tonight. The dog had already cost him one place. “You should be inside,
Taylor. It’s coooooolllllld out here.
Ho! Ho! Ho!”
“Taylor,”
said a woman from inside the trailer, “what are you doing out there?”
“I’m
talking to Santa!”
“Well, come
in the house. You’ll catch pneumonia out there.”
You ain’t kidding, lady, Frank thought.
“Well, Taylor, you head off to bed, and I’ll be back later with your presents.
But remember, you have to be asleep. Ho! Ho! Ho!”
Taylor ran
back into the trailer, slamming the door behind her. “Mommy! I saw Santa!”
Frank
hurried across the street to his car. He still had a lot of work to do.
Popping the
trunk of the Crown Vic, he dumped his latest haul inside. Slamming it shut, he
patted the deck lid and said, “Thanks, Donner.”
Dashing
back across the road, he made a bee line toward the most expensive home in the
park. He had seen this one towed in halves through downtown Willowbrook. The
man who lived there was a church deacon, and his wife sang in the chorus. If he
could hit this one, he could count this as a good night. He wouldn’t have the
haul he wanted, but he’d have a respectable amount.
About
halfway back to the double-wide…
“Hey,
Santa!”
Frank
looked up. His heart sank when he saw an adult version of little Taylor Mills
standing on the same porch. She wore black yoga pants and a Cleveland Browns
jersey.
“Um…” Ho-ho-ho would not work, he knew. “Hi?”
“You
playing Santa for the neighbors tonight?” she asked, cradling a mug in her
hands.
“Yeah,”
said Frank. “Just picking up a few bucks and doing something nice for the
kids.”
“That’s sweet,”
she said. “I’m Denise. Denise Mills. You talked to my daughter earlier.”
Okay, lady, I talked to your kid. Ho ho ho.
Tell her Santa will be back later. “My pleasure.”
“Listen,”
she said, “it’s just me and Taylor tonight. Her daddy’s gone.”
“He left?”
“Afghanistan.
His chopper went down in the mountains six months ago.”
Oh, boy. “That’s rough, Mrs. Mills.”
“Please.
Denise. Look, could I ask you to come in for a few minutes and give my daughter
a special visit from Santa? It’d mean a lot. I could give you some hot
chocolate with something a little extra in it.” She made a drinking motion with
one hand, then mimicked pouring something into her own hot chocolate.
Well, it
was freezing tonight. He wasn’t sure if he had much energy left to go beyond
the next trailer.
“Please?”
said Denise, her lips threatening to pout.
All Frank’s
defenses melted. “All right. One cup of cocoa. Is the girl still up?”
“Yes. Come
on in.”
Frank
climbed the steps and followed Denise into her single-wide. It was cramped like
any other single-wide trailer, but neatly kept. Places like this made Frank
think of a submarine, everything smaller and either stacked or recessed. Denise
dumped a packet of Swiss Miss into a mug and poured hot water onto it. She then
reached into the cupboard and produced a half-full bottle of peppermint
schnapps.
She held it
up with a playful smile. “Merry Christmas, Santa.”
“Well,
that’ll make for a warmer sleigh ride.” He accepted the mug as soon as she put
a shot of schnapps into it.
“Taylor,”
she hollered, “Santa’s here!”
For a six-year-old
girl, Taylor certainly thundered down the trailer’s narrow hallway like an
elephant charging. She stopped when she emerged into the kitchen. Seeing Frank
in his Santa suit, she barely gave him time to put down his hot chocolate
before she leapt into his lap. “Santa!”
“Well, ho
ho ho, Taylor,” said Frank, adopting his mall Santa voice. “Your mommy thought
I should pay you a visit since you’re all alone on Christmas Eve.”
Denise
raised her phone and snapped a picture of Taylor on Frank’s lap. “Her
grandmothers will love this.”
Frank said
a silent prayer of thanks that he’d done a reasonable job on his beard. “Well,”
he said in his best Santa voice, “maybe you could send a copy north for Mrs.
Claus.”
“Please,
mom,” said Taylor. “Please.”
“You just
want an edge over all the other boys and girls,” said Denise. “Listen, can you
watch her for a second? I gotta hit the little girls’ room.”
“Mommy’s
gotta tinkle!” Taylor giggled at her own joke as her mother blushed.
“Taylor
Anne Mills,” said Denise, “you behave in front of Santa.” That only made Taylor
laugh more loudly. “I’ll be right back.”
Brave woman, thought Frank. Unless she recognizes me from the mall. If
she does, I am royally screwed. “So, Taylor, have you been a good little
girl this year?”
“Don’t you
know, Santa?”
“Well, I
have my list that I check twice, but it’s in the sleigh.”
“Can I see
your sleigh?”
“Oh, I wish
I could show it to you.” Because that’s
what every little boy and girl wants to see, Santa tooling around in a 16-year-old
Ford. “But I have new reindeer this year, and they spook so easily.”
“What about
Rudolph?”
He had to
admit he was enjoying this, making up new pieces of the Santa myth on the
spot. “Ho ho ho, well, Rudolph’s been
with me a long, long time. He’s retired now and trains all the new reindeer.”
“Why does
he have a red nose?”
Vodka, thought Frank, who would need a
couple extra shots of the stuff when this was over. “Magic. Rudolph’s nose is
magic.”
“Magic?”
“How do you
think they fly and pull a sleigh behind them without it falling. Christmas is
magic, Taylor. Wonderful magic.” Wherein
an unemployed factory worker spirits your stuff away to fence after the New
Year. But let her figure that out when she grows up.
“The man on
the news said the North Pole might melt,” said Taylor. “What will you do then?”
“Why move
to Antarctica. Do you know where that is?” And
is your mommy pissing a whole two-liter back there?
“The South
Pole.”
“Yes. And
just like the North Pole, I can get to anywhere in the world from there. Only
the South Pole is on land.”
“Are there
reindeer?”
“I have
them brought in from Finland, which is waaaaay up north.”
The front
door opened and in walked a sheriff’s deputy. “Honey, I’m… Oh, hi. Who are
you?”
Frank tried
very hard not to crap his pants. Gently, he put Taylor down before standing.
“Why I’m Santa Claus! And who are you, Officer?”
“‘Deputy,’”
said the cop. His phone buzzed, and he looked down at it.
“Is it cold
out, Daddy?”
Daddy? Oh, shit. “Well, I must get
back to my sleigh,” said Frank, trying to make it to the door.
The deputy
blocked his path and had his hand on his weapon. He held up the phone, which
displayed a picture of Taylor on Santa’s lap. “Cute. You work out at the Edison
Plains Mall, don’t you?”
“Er…”
“And do you
drive a 1998 Crown Victoria with a primered fender and a bad set of rocker
panels?”
“Daddy,
what’s wrong?”
“That’s not
Santa, Taylor.”
Denise
emerged from the bathroom. “You got here quick.”
“Well,
someone called in about an abandoned car across the street, and someone else
said the Mrs. Perkins’s Doberman was going berserk. Then I got your text.” He
looked at Frank and said, “I’m going to assume that was you, wasn’t it?”
“Er…”
“What
happened to ‘Ho ho ho’?”
“I thought
you went down in Afghanistan.”
The deputy
smiled. “I did. They gave me a discharge as soon as they rescued me. Who told
you?”
“I never
said he was dead,” said Denise. “I just said he was gone and that he went down
in Afghanistan. He was gone; now he’s here.”
Frank looked
at the gun on the Deputy Mills’s hip. He could charge. He could grab the gun,
threaten his way out, and run for it. But then how far could he go running away
in a Santa suit that did not even warm him? He looked down at Taylor, who
looked confused. “So, Deputy, are my reindeer all right?”
Deputy
Mills hand now rested on his weapon. “Sir, I’m going to have to ask you to…”
“Because if
there’s a problem,” he continued, “we should go. I have some very special
presents for Taylor.” He winked at Mills. “So… Shall we go?”
Mills’s
hand relaxed on his gun. “I think Rudolph might have sprained his ankle landing
on one of the trailers.”
“Daddy!”
said Taylor. “Rudolph retired.”
Frank
needed a story fast, or both he and Taylor’s Christmas would be ruined. “I believe
you mean his son. Adolf. Ho, ho, ho.”
“Um… Yeah.
Adolf. Anyway, he looks like he hurt himself. Could you come with me?” Deputy
Mills had his hand his gun once more and gestured for the front door. “Shall
we?”
Frank
turned and knelt before Taylor. “No matter what happens, Taylor, you be a good
girl. Listen to your parents. And have a merry Christmas.”
Taylor
threw her arms around his neck and kissed him. “Bye, Santa!”
Frank got
up and said, “Let’s go, Deputy. I’ve got a lot of houses to visit tonight.”
“Including the
big one in Norwalk,” said Mills with a smirk. To Denise, he said, “I’ll be off
about three, maybe sooner since I’ll just have to do paperwork on…” He looked
over at Frank. “…Adolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer.”
“Be
careful, honey. Try not to hit any reindeer out there.”
Outside
Frank gave one last “Ho! Ho! Ho!” for Taylor’s benefit, then held out his
wrists. “Let’s get this overwith before your daughter realizes I’m the mall
Santa.”
“Save it,”
said Mills. “You could have run, you know. Told my wife you were busy, hopped
in your car, and made off with your take. Why’d you do it?”
“Why does a
burglar ever…?”
“I mean my
daughter. Why did you come in to talk to her? You know you blew your cover the
moment my wife invited you in for hot chocolate.”
Frank
thought about his own childhood. He remembered that scene from The Breakfast Club where Judd Nelson
rants about getting a carton of cigarettes for Christmas. That was his
childhood. Broken toys from Goodwill when he was a child, cartons of Camels
from the age of 12 onward. Things did improve when Frank got his driver’s
license. His old man would give him whiskey.
“I’ve never
had a good Christmas,” said Frank as he got into Mills’s cruiser. “And this
Christmas, I’m going to jail. At least your daughter would have a happy
memory.”
Mills shut
the door on him. Climbing in the front of the cruiser, he said, “Well, ‘Santa,’
I thank you for that. Seems you did some good tonight after all.”
As they
pulled out of Sunny Acres, Frank saw the tow truck backed up to his Crown Vic,
another Sheriff’s Department cruiser parked alongside.
He began to
cry.
01 December 2014
Holiday Blues
by Jan Grape
My good friend, Harlan Coben had an Op-Ed piece in the NY Times on Thursday and he graciously gave me permission to quote from it. I'll actually take advantage and use the whole article and along the way make comments.
RIDGEWOOD, NJ - THANKSGIVING weekend in1990, I spent two hours at the loneliest place in the world for an obscure novelist -- the book signing table at a Waldenbook in a suburban New Jersey mall.
[Have any of you had this experience?]
I sat at the table smiling like a game show host. Store patrons scurried past me, doing all they could to avoid eye contact. I kept smiling.
[If I had know Harlan back then, I would have advised him to try his best to speak to people as they walked by. It's not easy if you're shy, but you just have to push yourself. Think of yourself as an actor playing the part of a well-known author signing books.]
I straightened out my pile of free bookmarks for the umpteenth time, though so far none had been taken. I played with my pen. Authors at signings like this get good at playing with their pens. I pushed it to and fro. I curled my upper lip around the pen and made it into a makeshift mustache. I clipped it to my lower lip, in an almost masochistic way, and was able to click the pen open by moving my jaw and pressing it against my nose. You can't teach that skill, by the way. Practice. At one point, I took out a second pen, rolled up a spitball, and then let the two pens play hockey against each other. The Rollerball beat the Sharpie in overtime,
[Maybe offer to give each one walking by a free bookmark and sign it for them. One of my big show stoppers is to ask someone, "Do you read mysteries?" If they say yes, then I point to my book. If they say no, then I say, I'll bet you know someone who does. This will take care of your Christmas list or their birthday list or Father's, Mother's Day? You know, improvise your holiday.]
During the first hour of my signing, a grand total of four approached me. Two asked me where the bathroom was. The third explained his conspiracy theory linking the J.F.K. assassination with the decision by General Mills to add Crunch Berries to Cap'n Crunch breakfast cereal. The fourth asked me if we had a copy of the new Stephen King.
I kept smiling. Four copies of my brand-spanking-new-first novel -- Waldenbooks knew not to order too many -- stood limply on the shelf behind me. I missed the Barcalounger in my den. I longed for home and hearth, for stuffing my face with leftover turkey, for half-watching football games in which I had no rooting interest. Instead slow-baked under the fluorescent Waldenbook lights, the early Hipster booksellers glaring at me as though I was some kind of pedantic squatter. I had become the literary equivalent of a poster child -- "you could buy his book or you could turn the page."
Time didn't just pass slowly. It seemed to be moonwalking backward.
Then, with maybe 15 minutes left before I could scrape up the scraps of my dignity and head home., an old man shuffled toward me. He wiped his nose with I hoped was a beige hankie. His eyes were runny. Odds were this was going to be a where's-the-bathroom question, but this guy had all the makings of another conspiracy theorist.
The old man's gaze drifted over my shoulder, "What's that like?"
"Excuse me."
He gestured at the four books on the shelf behind me.
"Right," I said.
He shook his head in awe. "That's my dream, man. Seeing my book on a shelf in a bookstore." He lowered his gaze and met my eye. "So what's that like?"
I paused, letting the question sink in, but before I could reply, the old man lifted his eyes back to the bookshelf, smiled and shook his head again. "Lucky," he said, before turning and walking away.
He didn't buy a book. He didn't have to.
[Harlan Coben is the NY Times best-selling author of MISSING YOU, TELL NO ONE and the forthcoming title THE STRANGER]
And I know for a fact that Harlan doesn't sit unnoticed anymore at any book signing. When you feel alone at a book signing, think about what you MUST do to make it a fun experience. Bring along a bowl of chocolate kisses or some peppermint candy. Have some ball point pens made with your name and book title printed on them and hand those out when you catch someone's eye. You don't have to give out everyone of them but one every ten or fifteen minutes or so won't wreck your pocketbook.
Have some free bookmarks or postcards to give to everyone. You have to do more to promote yourself than just sit there like a bump on a log. Get creative. If you can't think of anything ask a friend or relative who is a craft person. You know...sell your book.
That's my best advice for the moment. See you next time.
[Harlan's article used with permission from Mr. Coben.]
Labels:
books,
bookstores,
Harlan Coben,
Jan Grape,
signings
Location:
Cottonwood Shores, TX, USA
30 November 2014
The First Female Detective
In my August post, “An Homage To Poe,” I discussed Andrew Forrester (pen name of J. Redding Ware) and his short story “Arrested On Suspicion.” I also mentioned The Female Detective, a collection of stories that he supposedly edited. I couldn’t find the book on Project Gutenberg. I found and downloaded it from Google Play. Because I couldn’t increase the small text in the scanned edition, I bought a print edition (released in 2012). The Female Detective was originally published in 1864.
In the introduction to the 2012 edition of The Female Detective, Mike Ashley accepts Forrester as the author of the stories, though the scanned edition shows him as the editor. When the book was published, there were no women detectives, either private or police, in Britain. It would be 50 years before women detectives appeared. Meanwhile, in the United States, the Pinkerton agency employed a woman detective in 1856, and the first policewoman appeared in 1908 in Portland, Oregon.
However, women as amateur detectives had appeared in stories prior to 1864, but “These works...involved women who, by circumstance, were forced to investigate matters.” According to Ashley, THE FEMALE DETECTIVE features the first professional woman detective: "Whether inspired by real events or entirely fictional it is clear that the mysterious 'G' is first and foremost the pioneering female detective.”
G, as the police refer to her (she calls herself Gladden), is retired from the detecting business and was wise enough to allow a “literary editor” to revise her manuscript. G wrote the “book to help show, by my experience, that the detective has some demand upon the gratitude of society.”
The first case in the collection, “Tenant For Life,” is about a five year old inheritance fraud that G feels she must expose. Her round-about way of telling the story at first annoyed me until I accepted that she, like many of us old folks, likes to talk. She considers herself “a good talking companion, and “women are in the habit of talking scandal, with me for a hearer, within three hours of my making their acquaintance."
From a cabman and his wife, she learns the story of how, five years earlier, the cabman bought a baby from a poor woman who appeared to be in distress. Shortly after the transaction, a lady ran after him looking for a woman with a baby and hears the baby crying in the cab. She offered him thirty pounds and he sold the baby to her. After hearing the story, G suspected the lady wanted to substitute the child for one who had died and that possibly an inheritance fraud was involved. She feels it is her duty to “deal out justice” and see that the property is return to the rightful owner, if it is in fact an inheritance fraud.
I like the story for the way in which G goes about the investigation. Researching the birth and death records of the village where the cabman had sold the baby, she discovers it was born close to the same time a wealthy lady, Mrs. Shedleigh, in the village died. Armed with this information, she locates a family consisting of a five-year-old girl, her father Mr. Newton Shedleigh, and his sister Miss Shedleigh. Disguising herself as a seamstress, she gains entrance into the Shedleigh household and learns all she can about the Shedleighs.
From her research on the law on inheritance, she learns that if the children of a husband and wife die before the wife, and she dies before the husband, he inherits her possession and becomes a “tenant for life.” If she dies without children, her property passes to her father’s brother. Her investigation of the Shedleighs leads to the dead wife’s uncle, whom she suspects is the rightful heir.
I like G even though she seems to be a meddlesome woman who interferes in other people’s lives to prove that detectives are necessary. I’m sure I’ll enjoy the remainder of her sleuthing adventures.
So long until next month when I must say goodbye.
Labels:
Andrew Forrester,
detectives,
history,
Louis Willis,
mysteries,
sleuths,
women
Location:
Knoxville, TN, USA
29 November 2014
Based on the Novel by . . .
by John Floyd
I'll start off with a fact gleaned from writer Stephen Follows's blog: More than half of the top 2000 films of the last twenty years were adaptations. The rest, of course, were original screenplays and remakes. I see a lot of all three, and I plan to see a lot more--but with regard to movies adapted from novels, I do always try to read the book before watching the movie.
Why? Simple answer: Because the book is usually better. Also, I like to be able to picture the characters, settings, etc., in my own mind first, rather than seeing instead the result of what was in someone else's mind.
Why? Simple answer: Because the book is usually better. Also, I like to be able to picture the characters, settings, etc., in my own mind first, rather than seeing instead the result of what was in someone else's mind.
If all that's true, one might ask, why bother to watch the movie at all? That's an easy one, too: I want to see how the filmmaker's view compares to my own. Besides, as I've said, I just like movies. And sometimes--not often, but sometimes--what I see on the screen turns out even better than what I saw on the page.
I think a good adaptation is when a piece of fiction, novel-length or short, great or terrible, is transformed into a good film.
Several categories are involved, here. And--as always--the following lists are based on my opinion only.
The four possibilities
1. Disappointing book becomes a disappointing movie: Dreamcatcher, Scarlett, Eragon, The Bridges of Madison County, The Reivers (I know, I know, it won the Pulitzer--but still), The Time Traveler's Wife, Battlefield Earth, Love Story, The Da Vinci Code, Message in a Bottle, The Betsy, The Valley of the Dolls. (NOTE: "Disappointing" doesn't necessarily mean "of poor quality." It just means "disappointing." To me.)
2. Book is better than the movie: The Stand, The Bonfire of the Vanities, The Great Gatsby, Congo, One for the Money, Great Expectations, The Haunting of Hill House, Ender's Game, The Golden Compass, Dune, The Hobbit, Mind Prey, Live and Let Die, Striptease, Tell No One, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, It, The Pillars of the Earth, Sphere, The Scarlet Letter, Timeline.
3. Movie is better than the book: Dances With Wolves, Die Hard, Mrs. Doubtfire, Dr. Strangelove, M*A*S*H, Forrest Gump, Les Miserables, Casino Royale (2006), Cape Fear, The Bourne Identity, The Graduate, Psycho, Heaven's Prisoners, Blade Runner, Thank You for Smoking, The Godfather, The Poseidon Adventure, Interview With the Vampire, L.A. Confidential.
4. Good book becomes an equally good movie: Mystic River, The Searchers, The Silence of the Lambs, The Grapes of Wrath, To Kill a Mockingbird, Jaws, The Dead Zone, The Caine Mutiny, The Eye of the Needle, Shane, Rebecca, From Russia With Love, Misery, Giant, Papillon, The Maltese Falcon, The Princess Bride, Magic, Hombre, Out of Sight, From Here to Eternity, Cool Hand Luke, Sands of the Kalahari, The Cider House Rules, The Big Sleep (1946), The Hunt for Red October, Gone With the Wind, A Time to Kill, Presumed Innocent, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Old Yeller, The Guns of Navarone, Life of Pi, The Lord of the Rings, The Green Mile, Jurassic Park, The Hunger Games, The Hustler, The Road, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, The Prince of Tides, Jackie Brown, The Day of the Jackal, The Help, Holes, Flight of the Phoenix, Appaloosa, Third Man on the Mountain, No Country for Old Men, Get Shorty, Death Wish, The High and the Mightry. (And, according to R.T. Lawton's SleuthSayers column yesterday, Enemy at the Gates. I've seen that movie but I've not read the book.)
There are obviously many, many more, but my head's beginning to hurt, and yours probably is too. Can you suggest others, in the above categories? Do you disagree with some of my choices? (My wife certainly does.) Should I stop buying books at garage sales and cancel my Netflix subscription? All opinions are welcome.
Observations from the cheap seats
Note 1: A lot of outstanding films have been adapted from--believe it or not--short stories. Examples: Rear Window ("It Had to Be Murder"), High Noon ("The Tin Star"), It's a Wonderful Life ("The Greatest Gift"), 3:10 to Yuma, Brokeback Mountain, Duel, Stagecoach (The Stage to Lordsburg"), Bad Day at Black Rock ("Bad Day at Honda"), The Swimmer, Minority Report, It Happened One Night ("Night Bus"), 2001: A Space Odyssey ("The Sentinel"), The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, The Fly, Don't Look Now, The Secret Life of Walter Mitty.
Note 2: Good novellas usually make good movies. Why is this true? I think it's because a novella-length story most closely fits the length of a screenplay. Short-story adaptations (unless they become short films, or "episodes" in TV shows like Twilight Zone or Alfred Hitchcock Presents) require the screenwriter to add a lot to the originals--and novel adaptations (unless they become TV miniseries like Centennial, Roots, and Lonesome Dove) require the screenwriter to leave a lot out. Examples of excellent novella-based movies: The Old Man and the Sea, Double Indemnity, The Mist, Apocalypse Now (Heart of Darkness), Stand By Me (The Body), The Shawshank Redemption (Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption), The Thing (Who Goes There?), The Birds, The Man Who Would Be King, The Third Man, Hearts in Atlantis (Low Men in Yellow Coats), The Snows of Kilimanjaro. Most of these were able to remain fairly true to the source material.
Looking ahead . . .
I'm hoping that movies will one day be made from the following novels: The Bottoms (Joe Lansdale), The Given Day (Dennis Lehane), The Quiet Game (Greg Iles), Rose (Martin Cruz Smith), Plum Island (Nelson DeMille), The Matarese Circle (Robert Ludlum), 11/22/63 (Stephen King), The Two Minute Rule (Robert Crais), A Cold Day in Paradise (Steve Hamilton), Crooked Letter, Crooked Letter (Tom Franklin), Booked to Die (John Dunning), Cimarron Rose (James Lee Burke), Destroyer Angel (Nevada Barr), Killing Floor (Lee Child), Time and Again (Jack Finney). I'm keeping fingers crossed--I'd miss an episode of The Walking Dead to see one of those.
At the moment, I'm looking forward to watching several recently-released and upcoming films based on novels: Gone Girl, The Maze Runner, Mockingjay, The Hundred-Foot Journey, and Horns. Will they be good or bad? Better than their books, or worse?
Who knows. You pays your money and you takes your chances.
Maybe that's part of the fun.
Labels:
adaptations,
Floyd,
movies,
novellas,
novels,
short stories
28 November 2014
Three Books by David Robbins
by R.T. Lawton
by R.T. Lawton
A few weeks back when I was looking for something new to read, I stumbled across The Empty Quarter (2014), the latest book by David Robbins. Its title intrigued me. I opened the book and scanned the inside. The offered sample read well, so I made my purchase.
The Empty Quarter opens in Afghanistan with a team of para rescuers from the Air Force's SOE branch being landed in an open field by a Pave Low helicopter, protected by a gunship. Their mission is to locate, treat and evacuate three wounded British marines whose patrol is pinned down by the enemy. In the process, the reader gets introduced to some of the main characters and finds out what makes them do the hazardous job they do. I then expected the rest of the book to take place in Afghanistan with that war. It didn't.
The story next moved to Yemen where the reader is introduced to Arif, a Saudi who returned from fighting the Russians in Afghanistan twenty-five years previously. Having returned to his native Saudi Arabia, he found he no longer fit into that society. Didn't help that he married a Saudi princess and became embroiled in conflict with her father, the prince. A short prison term for our likable antagonist soon followed. Then, acting upon the words from the prophet Muhammad from his own troubles centuries before, Arif and his wife fled to Yemen. Now, Arif uses his software programming skills to anonymously harass and embarrass the Saudi government through the internet.
"When disaster threatens, seek refuge in Yemen." ~ The Prophet Muhammad to his followers
after retreating from Mecca.
Tension remains taut throughout the entire book, all of which is leading up to an escape and chase into The Empty Quarter, a vast desert in Yemen controlled by various tribal factions who often set up road blocks on the desert highway and demand bribes for any wishing to pass. Tribal bonds and blood feuds soon affect both the escapers and the pursurers. The escapers are an American low level diplomat (ex-Army Ranger Captain) who wrongly believes that Arif's wife is trying to go back to her father, a slippery Yemen Intelligence Colonel who lives in the world of spies, and Arif's wife who is strangely silent on the entire matter. The pursurers are a desparate Arif, a Yemen family of brothers who owe a death bed vow to assist this Saudi mujahedeen who has lived in their village for many years. A SEAL unit is on standby for extraction and the para rescuers are prepared to assist, but the plans of men often go awry with events beyond their control. It all collides at the ruins of an ancient building just off the desert highway, and it sometimes becomes difficult to tell who the real bad guys are.
The ending was not what I expected. If you don't get a lump in your throat at the conclusion of this book, then you are made of stern granite.
Enjoyed that novel so much that I went back to see what else David Robbins had written. To my surprise, I had already read one of his earlier books years ago, War of the Rats (1999) which is set in Stalingrad during World War II. Hitler has decreed that his army will capture this city named after the leader of the Soviet Union, while Stalin for his part has sent Krushchev to bolster the city's defenses down to the last man, woman and child, no surrender. The war for ground in the city slowly grinds down to a virtual stalemate. Snipers are called in to assist both sides.
If you are starting to think this scenario sounds familiar, you're correct. Robbin's book, War of the Rats, was made into a movie, Enemy at the Gates. I liked them both.
Realizing that Robbins likes to base his characters and story backgrounds on real people, events and existing organizations, I decided to try a third novel, The Assassin's Gallery (2006). This one is set in 1945 with most of the story taking place in the U.S. During the dark of night on New Year's Eve, a swimmer comes ashore from a submarine. She successfully lands on a beach outside a small town in Massachusetts and starts walking up the beach road to go to the house of her American contact. Unfortunately for her, two civilian coast watchers are parked up that road in an old pickup. Now, she must use all her talents as a professional assassin to cover her tracks.
Meanwhile in Scotland, an American who teaches at a university also secretly trains Jedburgh teams to be dropped behind German and Japanese lines to operate as assassins and saboteurs. This professor gets recalled to America by a member of the Secret Service whom he once trained as a Jedburgh. This particular Secret Service agent believes an assassin is en route to Washington, DC to kill the president.
The rest of the book matches wits between the alleged assassin and the professor. As the story progresses, the calendar keeps moving closer to April 12, 1945, the actual date of Franklin D. Roosevelt's death at the Little White House in Georgia. If you think you know the ending, you should consider two facts to go with this tale of fiction. One, shortly after Roosevelt's death, Josef Stalin sent a telegram to the U.S. State Department requesting that an autopsy be performed to determine if Roosevelt had been poisoned. And second, no chemist's report concerning what may or may not have been in Roosevelt's last meal is available even though the Secret Service ordered a test on the contents of that meal.
Ah, happy reading.
A few weeks back when I was looking for something new to read, I stumbled across The Empty Quarter (2014), the latest book by David Robbins. Its title intrigued me. I opened the book and scanned the inside. The offered sample read well, so I made my purchase.
The Empty Quarter opens in Afghanistan with a team of para rescuers from the Air Force's SOE branch being landed in an open field by a Pave Low helicopter, protected by a gunship. Their mission is to locate, treat and evacuate three wounded British marines whose patrol is pinned down by the enemy. In the process, the reader gets introduced to some of the main characters and finds out what makes them do the hazardous job they do. I then expected the rest of the book to take place in Afghanistan with that war. It didn't.
The story next moved to Yemen where the reader is introduced to Arif, a Saudi who returned from fighting the Russians in Afghanistan twenty-five years previously. Having returned to his native Saudi Arabia, he found he no longer fit into that society. Didn't help that he married a Saudi princess and became embroiled in conflict with her father, the prince. A short prison term for our likable antagonist soon followed. Then, acting upon the words from the prophet Muhammad from his own troubles centuries before, Arif and his wife fled to Yemen. Now, Arif uses his software programming skills to anonymously harass and embarrass the Saudi government through the internet.
"When disaster threatens, seek refuge in Yemen." ~ The Prophet Muhammad to his followers
after retreating from Mecca.
Tension remains taut throughout the entire book, all of which is leading up to an escape and chase into The Empty Quarter, a vast desert in Yemen controlled by various tribal factions who often set up road blocks on the desert highway and demand bribes for any wishing to pass. Tribal bonds and blood feuds soon affect both the escapers and the pursurers. The escapers are an American low level diplomat (ex-Army Ranger Captain) who wrongly believes that Arif's wife is trying to go back to her father, a slippery Yemen Intelligence Colonel who lives in the world of spies, and Arif's wife who is strangely silent on the entire matter. The pursurers are a desparate Arif, a Yemen family of brothers who owe a death bed vow to assist this Saudi mujahedeen who has lived in their village for many years. A SEAL unit is on standby for extraction and the para rescuers are prepared to assist, but the plans of men often go awry with events beyond their control. It all collides at the ruins of an ancient building just off the desert highway, and it sometimes becomes difficult to tell who the real bad guys are.
The ending was not what I expected. If you don't get a lump in your throat at the conclusion of this book, then you are made of stern granite.
Enjoyed that novel so much that I went back to see what else David Robbins had written. To my surprise, I had already read one of his earlier books years ago, War of the Rats (1999) which is set in Stalingrad during World War II. Hitler has decreed that his army will capture this city named after the leader of the Soviet Union, while Stalin for his part has sent Krushchev to bolster the city's defenses down to the last man, woman and child, no surrender. The war for ground in the city slowly grinds down to a virtual stalemate. Snipers are called in to assist both sides.
If you are starting to think this scenario sounds familiar, you're correct. Robbin's book, War of the Rats, was made into a movie, Enemy at the Gates. I liked them both.
Realizing that Robbins likes to base his characters and story backgrounds on real people, events and existing organizations, I decided to try a third novel, The Assassin's Gallery (2006). This one is set in 1945 with most of the story taking place in the U.S. During the dark of night on New Year's Eve, a swimmer comes ashore from a submarine. She successfully lands on a beach outside a small town in Massachusetts and starts walking up the beach road to go to the house of her American contact. Unfortunately for her, two civilian coast watchers are parked up that road in an old pickup. Now, she must use all her talents as a professional assassin to cover her tracks.
Meanwhile in Scotland, an American who teaches at a university also secretly trains Jedburgh teams to be dropped behind German and Japanese lines to operate as assassins and saboteurs. This professor gets recalled to America by a member of the Secret Service whom he once trained as a Jedburgh. This particular Secret Service agent believes an assassin is en route to Washington, DC to kill the president.
The rest of the book matches wits between the alleged assassin and the professor. As the story progresses, the calendar keeps moving closer to April 12, 1945, the actual date of Franklin D. Roosevelt's death at the Little White House in Georgia. If you think you know the ending, you should consider two facts to go with this tale of fiction. One, shortly after Roosevelt's death, Josef Stalin sent a telegram to the U.S. State Department requesting that an autopsy be performed to determine if Roosevelt had been poisoned. And second, no chemist's report concerning what may or may not have been in Roosevelt's last meal is available even though the Secret Service ordered a test on the contents of that meal.
Ah, happy reading.
27 November 2014
Giving Thanks
by Brian Thornton
Wha-huh? It's Thanksgiving again ALREADY?
Where the heck did thus year fly off to?
Ah, well.
Here's what I'm grateful for (in no particular order):
My wife.
My son.
My parents.
My brother.
The rest of my far-flung, crazy family.
Wonderful friendships higher in terms of quality and sheer numbers than I have any right to command.
My two jobs. One I like, the other, I love. I'll leave it for you to sort out which is which.
Health, welfare, sense of humor. The whole package.
And lest we forget, you, the reader, for bothering with a trifle such as this little confection, on a day when there is so much heavy lifting to do on the eating side of things.
Happy Thanksgiving, one and all!
Brian
26 November 2014
Tinker Tailor, Soldier Sailor
Musings, perhaps, less than a coherent whole, but bear with me.
I was a big fan of LeCarre's from the get-go, with THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD, although I remember throwing the book across the room when I finished it. I later liked A SMALL TOWN IN GERMANY a lot, because by then I was familiar with the turf, both physical and internal, but I didn't much care for THE LOOKING GLASS WAR, and actually for similar reasons - I knew sources and methods, and I found the tradecraft in the book unconvincing. Then came TINKER TAILOR SOLDIER SPY, THE HONORABLE SCHOOLBOY, and SMILEY'S PEOPLE (collectively, the Quest for Karla), and next, my own personal favorite, THE LITTLE DRUMMER GIRL. "Sooner or later, they say in the trade, a man will sign his name."
LeCarre's been well-served, by and large, by movie and television adaptions. THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD, with Richard Burton and Oskar Werner, is bracing and intelligent. THE DEADLY AFFAIR (adapted from CALL FOR THE DEAD) is even better - James Mason as George Smiley, although the character's given a different name. LOOKING GLASS WAR? Well, okay, it's got Tony Hopkins, but I think it's a dud. LITTLE DRUMMER GIRL, the movie? Not a failure, by any means, just a little out of focus, and abbreviated, of necessity, with a 130-minute runtime. Which brings us to the two back-to-back triumphs, Alex Guinness playing Smiley in the BBC miniseries, first TINKER TAILOR and then SMILEY'S PEOPLE.
What did I think of the more recent feature version of TINKER TAILOR, with Gary Oldman? I have two contradictory reactions. If you didn't know the story, you'd get lost in the thickets. On the other hand, not knowing the story, you wouldn't realize what you're missing. Having read the book more than once, and seen Guinness more than once, I kept noticing holes in the plot - how did Smiley get from Point A to Point B, when they left out the roadmap? But again, if you came to the movie without preconceptions, it might slide right by, nothing in your peripheral vision. The biggest weakness of the Oldman feature isn't Oldman, of course: he's terrific. And the compression, eh, you can't do much about that. The real weakness is in the supporting characters, not the actors, but the parts they play.
Maybe it's comparing apples and oranges. Let's face it, if you give yourself two hours (the movie version), vice five (the BBC version), a lot of stuff is bound to fall by the wayside, but in the TV production, you get a very strong sense of Toby Esterhase and Bill Haydon and Roy Bland, and each of them seem solid, probable suspects - each of them having something to hide, of course - not to mention what a snake Percy Alleline is. That's really what I missed most in the picture, not the careful chess game Smiley plays, but the feeling he's up against a real adversary, or several of them, conspiring.
Obviously, it's easy to take shots at a movie when you don't think it measures up to the book, and there's the obverse, that you can make a better picture out of a generic potboiler than you can from a more heavyweight source. They're two very different mediums, anyway. If you've ever tried to do a screen treatment (I've done a couple), you find out first thing that you're in a foreign country, the environment is at right angles to a novel or a short story. But in either case, it seems to me that it's about gaining the confidence of the audience - maybe with a movie, the audience is more passive than a reader is, if your ideal reader is engaged, but you can't let them slip through your fingers, either way. They surrender their trust, and you have a responsibility to play fair, and give as good as you got.
I'm not, in this sense, complaining. I respected the Gary Oldman picture of TINKER TAILOR - I just wasn't invested in it. It's likely I was just too ready to find it wanting, compared to the longer Guinness version, which has a lot of room to breathe. And maybe that's the issue. It's the difference between total immersion and a quick, chilly dip in the pool. Both have their virtues. In the case of TINKER TAILOR (and SMILEY'S PEOPLE, as well), I think the stories are better served by a circular, more ambiguous method. It's a matter of pacing. Not the shortest distance between two points, or the most direct, but the long way around, a different rhythm, where time is elastic, and memory an unreliable witness.
DavidEdgerleyGates.com
I was a big fan of LeCarre's from the get-go, with THE SPY WHO CAME IN FROM THE COLD, although I remember throwing the book across the room when I finished it. I later liked A SMALL TOWN IN GERMANY a lot, because by then I was familiar with the turf, both physical and internal, but I didn't much care for THE LOOKING GLASS WAR, and actually for similar reasons - I knew sources and methods, and I found the tradecraft in the book unconvincing. Then came TINKER TAILOR SOLDIER SPY, THE HONORABLE SCHOOLBOY, and SMILEY'S PEOPLE (collectively, the Quest for Karla), and next, my own personal favorite, THE LITTLE DRUMMER GIRL. "Sooner or later, they say in the trade, a man will sign his name."
What did I think of the more recent feature version of TINKER TAILOR, with Gary Oldman? I have two contradictory reactions. If you didn't know the story, you'd get lost in the thickets. On the other hand, not knowing the story, you wouldn't realize what you're missing. Having read the book more than once, and seen Guinness more than once, I kept noticing holes in the plot - how did Smiley get from Point A to Point B, when they left out the roadmap? But again, if you came to the movie without preconceptions, it might slide right by, nothing in your peripheral vision. The biggest weakness of the Oldman feature isn't Oldman, of course: he's terrific. And the compression, eh, you can't do much about that. The real weakness is in the supporting characters, not the actors, but the parts they play.
Maybe it's comparing apples and oranges. Let's face it, if you give yourself two hours (the movie version), vice five (the BBC version), a lot of stuff is bound to fall by the wayside, but in the TV production, you get a very strong sense of Toby Esterhase and Bill Haydon and Roy Bland, and each of them seem solid, probable suspects - each of them having something to hide, of course - not to mention what a snake Percy Alleline is. That's really what I missed most in the picture, not the careful chess game Smiley plays, but the feeling he's up against a real adversary, or several of them, conspiring.
Obviously, it's easy to take shots at a movie when you don't think it measures up to the book, and there's the obverse, that you can make a better picture out of a generic potboiler than you can from a more heavyweight source. They're two very different mediums, anyway. If you've ever tried to do a screen treatment (I've done a couple), you find out first thing that you're in a foreign country, the environment is at right angles to a novel or a short story. But in either case, it seems to me that it's about gaining the confidence of the audience - maybe with a movie, the audience is more passive than a reader is, if your ideal reader is engaged, but you can't let them slip through your fingers, either way. They surrender their trust, and you have a responsibility to play fair, and give as good as you got.
I'm not, in this sense, complaining. I respected the Gary Oldman picture of TINKER TAILOR - I just wasn't invested in it. It's likely I was just too ready to find it wanting, compared to the longer Guinness version, which has a lot of room to breathe. And maybe that's the issue. It's the difference between total immersion and a quick, chilly dip in the pool. Both have their virtues. In the case of TINKER TAILOR (and SMILEY'S PEOPLE, as well), I think the stories are better served by a circular, more ambiguous method. It's a matter of pacing. Not the shortest distance between two points, or the most direct, but the long way around, a different rhythm, where time is elastic, and memory an unreliable witness.
DavidEdgerleyGates.com
Labels:
books,
David Edgerley Gates,
John le Carré,
movies
25 November 2014
Important Thinking On British Televsion Mysteries
by David Dean
Being a trained observer from my police days, it has not escaped my notice that many of my fellow SleuthSayers are fans of British television mysteries. It helped that several of you wrote articles on this very subject--these were my first clues. I suspect that many of SleuthSayers' readers are fans, as well. I don't have enough evidence to make an arrest, but I think that it's a reasonable suspicion. So, knowing that I am in good company, I am ready to confess without benefit of counsel, that I, too, enjoy these programs from the misty home of the English language.
I've heard, or read, several very good reasons for liking the Brit mysteries (as well as some of their other programming such as "Call The Midwives"), and I have a few of my own which I'm anxious to share. Firstly, everybody speaks with these really great accents, though sometimes they are difficult to understand. I have advocated subtitling, but this has not yet been enacted. What is it about their accents, anyway? There are dozens of "English" accents being spoken around the globe, from the U.S. to South Africa, but not one of them sound as smart as Englishers themselves. That's just not fair. I want to sound smart, too. But since I can't, I like to watch the British being cultured and savvy. Sometimes I try on an English accent at home, but Robin either studiously ignores me, refusing to respond to any of my extremely pithy observations, or tells me to stop embarrassing myself. I feel smarter when I do this, though she says that I don't sound, or look, smarter at all. She is of Irish descent on both sides of her family and is unreasonably hostile to the English, I think. Things only get worse when I switch to an Irish accent.
So, the accents are cool, but that's not the only reason I like British television. There's also the locations. My absolute favorite is Oxford, the setting of the Inspector Morse, and latterly, the Inspector Lewis, series. Notice how I worked in "latterly"? That's how they talk. Besides being an incredibly beautiful city with its "dreaming spires" (don't ask), it also puts the lie to British weather being lousy. It's sunny nearly every episode--and this show (in both its manifestations) has a decades-long history! I can't understand why all the Brits want to move to Spain when they've got Oxford. If you follow the adventures of Rosemary and Thyme, you'll find that they too walk in beauty beneath a glorious sun and flawless sky. As soon as Robin retires, we're saddling up for some of that gorgeous English weather! To hell with Ft. Lauderdale!
But the main reason that I like British programming may surprise you. Yes, the wonderful acting is certainly a draw, but that's not it altogether. It has to do with the casting. Have you ever noticed that, unlike American television, British actors are not uniformly attractive? In fact, in many cases even the actors and actresses in the leading roles of British shows are not in the least bit glamorous. They're allowed to look like me over there, and still work. Inspector Robbie Lewis would never be confused for an American television detective. He might, however, be mistaken for an actual police officer. Neither Lewis and Hathaway, nor the inspector/sergeant duo on Midsomer Murders appear as if they run ten miles a day and spend an hour every morning in the gym. I've never seen any of them beat anybody up, which is a daily requirement of their American TV counterparts, and very calorie-consuming. And since they don't carry guns, they can't shoot any villains. They actually say that, you know--villains. As for R and T, they spend all their time investigating murders at various castles, hotels, and estates across England while doing some light gardening, and taking numerous breaks to snack and drink wine. These Brits appear to drink a lot of wine! I always thought they were big on warm beer, but no, it's wine for these folks, and it's always being served at things called fetes, which no American knows the meaning of; though they look a lot like parties. They seem to be held mostly on village "greens" or in gardens. Though, when the weather doesn't permit (which is almost never--see above) they are held in drawing rooms. No American knows what kind of room that is either, but it doesn't matter. This is another thing I like about English life on the telly (sorry, Robin, old girl); they do a lot of partying! The down side is that the guys almost always have to wear a tux, though they call them something else, I think. Anyway, it's kind of nice to see men and women who could pass for what I call "normal" populating the screen, with nary a "six-pack" ab between them.
So there you have it, all the good reasons to watch British television. Oh...were you thinking it was the clever writing and convoluted plots that form the centerpieces of these programs? How the hell would I know? I can't understand half of what they're saying. I just like how they say it.
English TV Policemen with authentic accents |
I've heard, or read, several very good reasons for liking the Brit mysteries (as well as some of their other programming such as "Call The Midwives"), and I have a few of my own which I'm anxious to share. Firstly, everybody speaks with these really great accents, though sometimes they are difficult to understand. I have advocated subtitling, but this has not yet been enacted. What is it about their accents, anyway? There are dozens of "English" accents being spoken around the globe, from the U.S. to South Africa, but not one of them sound as smart as Englishers themselves. That's just not fair. I want to sound smart, too. But since I can't, I like to watch the British being cultured and savvy. Sometimes I try on an English accent at home, but Robin either studiously ignores me, refusing to respond to any of my extremely pithy observations, or tells me to stop embarrassing myself. I feel smarter when I do this, though she says that I don't sound, or look, smarter at all. She is of Irish descent on both sides of her family and is unreasonably hostile to the English, I think. Things only get worse when I switch to an Irish accent.
Dreaming Spires |
Rosemary and Thyme |
So there you have it, all the good reasons to watch British television. Oh...were you thinking it was the clever writing and convoluted plots that form the centerpieces of these programs? How the hell would I know? I can't understand half of what they're saying. I just like how they say it.
Labels:
actors,
America,
Britain,
Inspector Lewis,
Midsomer Murders,
mysteries,
television,
UK
24 November 2014
USC Scores
by Fran Rizer
The University of South Carolina scored big in October, 2014. No, I'm not talking about the football team. I'm referring to 150 boxes containing 2400 linear feet of documents, a couple of typewriters, and some other writing equipment.
What makes this special? The fact that the documents belonged to Leonard Elmore.
The following article appeared in Columbia, SC, weekly newspaper Free Times:
Elmore "Dutch" Leonard was a true son of Detroit, but this week Columbia became the eternal resting place for his literary legacy. At a Wednesday ceremony at Hollings Library, USC President Harris Pastides announced that the university had acquired the complete archive of Leonard, who died in August of last year at 87. The university would not disclose the cost of the acquisition.
Besides all of his published work, the collection includes over 450 drafts of Leonard's novels, short stories and screenplays. The collection also includes appointment books, research files, letters, photographs, director's chairs from movie sets, many awards, his desk, typewriters--and even some Hawaiian shirts and a pair of sneakers.
The collection covers a 60-year writing career that spans Westerns--including the screenplays for films like Hombre, 3:10 to Yuma and Joe Kidd--to crime fiction, where he made his name with novels such as Swag, LaBrava, Get Shorty, Rum Punch and Maximum Bob, among many others. Many of these drafts can be seen under glass at the Hollings Library, such as the handwritten draft on yellow legal paper of his oft-quoted "Ten Rules of Writing." (Rule One: Never open a book with weather.)
"Each page is unique primary research material that will bring researchers from around the world," said Pastides. The acquisition is a considerable boost for the university's research collection, which also holds the papers of F. Scott Fitzgerald, and in recent years has acquired both a significant Hemingway collection as well as the Pat Conroy archive.
"Certainly, he's one of the most significant and influential writers of the second half of the twentieth century," said longtime crime and mystery editor Otto Penzler, who was at Wednesday's ceremony. "The number of very accomplished mystery writers who have tried, to some degree, to emulate Duch's style--in terms of quick, punchy dialogue, leaving out the parts people tend to skip, and that sort of thing, is enormous," Penzler said. "Almost everybody now, to some degree, has been influenced by Elmore Leonard and his style of writing."
One such devotee is writer-director Daniel Schechter, who found Leonard a deeply cinematic writer, which proved beneficial when Schechter made the recent Life of Crime, starring Jennifer Aniston, based on Leonard's novel The Switch. "It felt like I was given not just a good book, but a great script by Elmore Leonard.:
So just how did the university snag the collection? Because USC Dean of Libraries Tom McNally went after it, and Leonard liked what the university had to offer. When McNally first made inquiries, he half-expected that the well-heeled Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin--which has the manuscripts of everyone from James Joyce to David Foster Wallace--had already snapped up the rights.
"It came about as a surprise," said McNally, to discover that Leonard's collection was still in play.
"Elmore's big statement was 'I don't care about posterity, I care about now," said his longtime researcher Greg Sutter. Sutter, who has been putting the archive into shape for some time, said there were extensive talks with Michigan State Univesity in Lansing. But while Sutter was thinking Michigan, Leonard started getting calls from McNally.
"I called him every other week," McNally said. "I got to know him, started talking to him about his collection coming, asked him to come down as a speaker. I told him we wanted to give him the Thomas Cooper Society Medal."
Sutter was already familiar with USC. He had visited in 2006 for the university's exhibit in honor of crime writer George V. Higgins, and thought of it as a model for a future Leonard retrospective. While the Higgings collection would turn out to have a major impact on Leonard's decision to leave his papers with USC, Leonard's son Peter said Wednesday that his father was a little leery of the award.
"I said 'Do you know who has received this award?" Peter recalls asking. "John Updike, Norman Mailer, William Styron." Elmore said 'I don't write like them.' I said, 'It doesn't matter. This is a prestigious thing.' " Elmore and Peter Leonard and Sutter arrived for the ceremony in May of last year, and the writer liked both USC and Columbia--especially the restaurant Saluda's.
"He loved the fact that they had grits and pork belly on the menu," Peter Leonard said. His father, who was born in New Orleans, grew up on Southern cooking What really sealed the deal, though, was Leonard's tour of the Irvin Rare Book Library, when Leonard saw that the university housed the works of the two writers who influenced him more than anyone else: Ernest Hemingway and Higgins.
Hemingway collector Edgar Grissom, who donated his archive to the university in 2012, showed Leonard the first editions of Hemingway. "Then Edgar pulled out a manuscript of For Whom the Bell Tolls," Peter Leonard said, "and I could see my dad's eyes light up."
Then there was the Higgins archive, and Leonard got a look at the manuscript of The Friends of Eddie Coyle. That was the very novel, back in the 1970's that Leonard's agent had insisted that he read. "Elmore said it really influenced him," Peter Leonard said. "He saw how Higgins was writing, and that book set him free, he said."
The destination of his archive was now clear. "There was Hemingway, there was Higgins, and I think all of these things just had an impact," Peter Leonard said.
"He was swept away," McNally said, "by the collections, and what we're trying to do here in this library. We don't have all the money that the Ransom Center has, but we take a real personal approach with our writers. We make a real commitment to them, that we're not just going to take the collections and put them on a dusty shelf and forget about them."
On the plane back home, Peter Leonard asked his father what he thought of South Carolina. "That's where I want my papers to go," he said.
Peter Leonard, who is also a novelist, admits South Carolina is not the first place you think of a writer whose novels are neck-deep in the crime and corruption of inner-city Detroit. "Friends of mine have said, 'Why South Carolina?' Because it doesn't really make a lot of sense until you know everything."
"It's kind of hard, when you're a favorite son of Michigan, to leave it," Sutter said. "It's not that they didn't have the facilities or the energy to do it. This university is dedicated to creating multiple collections in crime fiction and this acquisition is only going to help them get more."
"I didn't know he had any particular connection to the University of South Carolina," said Penzler. "But I couldn't think of a greater library for those papers to go to. The fact he's associated with Hemingway and Fitzgerald and other significant American writers, I think really does show the level of respect and admiration that Elmore Leonard is getting and richly deserves."
The above is printed in full with permission.
www.free-times.com/blogs/usc-scores-collection-of-crime-writer-elmore-leonard-101614
For more, go to:
www.elmoreleonard.com
I wanted to share this with SS readers, but please don't think I "copped out" by simply copying and pasting Mr. Welch's feature story. Since that frequently distorts format on SleuthSayers, I typed it out word-by-word. I tried to remain true to the article, but if there are any typos, please be assured they are mine, not Mr. Welch's. Since I live very near Columbia, SC, if any of you come to SC to see the collection, let me know and I'll take you out to eat some grits and pork belly.
Until we meet again, take care of . . . you.
What makes this special? The fact that the documents belonged to Leonard Elmore.
The following article appeared in Columbia, SC, weekly newspaper Free Times:
USC Scores Collection of Crime Writer Elmore Leonard
By Rodney Welch
Elmore "Dutch" Leonard was a true son of Detroit, but this week Columbia became the eternal resting place for his literary legacy. At a Wednesday ceremony at Hollings Library, USC President Harris Pastides announced that the university had acquired the complete archive of Leonard, who died in August of last year at 87. The university would not disclose the cost of the acquisition.
Besides all of his published work, the collection includes over 450 drafts of Leonard's novels, short stories and screenplays. The collection also includes appointment books, research files, letters, photographs, director's chairs from movie sets, many awards, his desk, typewriters--and even some Hawaiian shirts and a pair of sneakers.
The collection covers a 60-year writing career that spans Westerns--including the screenplays for films like Hombre, 3:10 to Yuma and Joe Kidd--to crime fiction, where he made his name with novels such as Swag, LaBrava, Get Shorty, Rum Punch and Maximum Bob, among many others. Many of these drafts can be seen under glass at the Hollings Library, such as the handwritten draft on yellow legal paper of his oft-quoted "Ten Rules of Writing." (Rule One: Never open a book with weather.)
Elmore Leonard 1925-2013 |
"Certainly, he's one of the most significant and influential writers of the second half of the twentieth century," said longtime crime and mystery editor Otto Penzler, who was at Wednesday's ceremony. "The number of very accomplished mystery writers who have tried, to some degree, to emulate Duch's style--in terms of quick, punchy dialogue, leaving out the parts people tend to skip, and that sort of thing, is enormous," Penzler said. "Almost everybody now, to some degree, has been influenced by Elmore Leonard and his style of writing."
One such devotee is writer-director Daniel Schechter, who found Leonard a deeply cinematic writer, which proved beneficial when Schechter made the recent Life of Crime, starring Jennifer Aniston, based on Leonard's novel The Switch. "It felt like I was given not just a good book, but a great script by Elmore Leonard.:
So just how did the university snag the collection? Because USC Dean of Libraries Tom McNally went after it, and Leonard liked what the university had to offer. When McNally first made inquiries, he half-expected that the well-heeled Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin--which has the manuscripts of everyone from James Joyce to David Foster Wallace--had already snapped up the rights.
Called "Dutch," Leonard had his own director's chair at filmings |
"Elmore's big statement was 'I don't care about posterity, I care about now," said his longtime researcher Greg Sutter. Sutter, who has been putting the archive into shape for some time, said there were extensive talks with Michigan State Univesity in Lansing. But while Sutter was thinking Michigan, Leonard started getting calls from McNally.
"I called him every other week," McNally said. "I got to know him, started talking to him about his collection coming, asked him to come down as a speaker. I told him we wanted to give him the Thomas Cooper Society Medal."
Sutter was already familiar with USC. He had visited in 2006 for the university's exhibit in honor of crime writer George V. Higgins, and thought of it as a model for a future Leonard retrospective. While the Higgings collection would turn out to have a major impact on Leonard's decision to leave his papers with USC, Leonard's son Peter said Wednesday that his father was a little leery of the award.
"I said 'Do you know who has received this award?" Peter recalls asking. "John Updike, Norman Mailer, William Styron." Elmore said 'I don't write like them.' I said, 'It doesn't matter. This is a prestigious thing.' " Elmore and Peter Leonard and Sutter arrived for the ceremony in May of last year, and the writer liked both USC and Columbia--especially the restaurant Saluda's.
"He loved the fact that they had grits and pork belly on the menu," Peter Leonard said. His father, who was born in New Orleans, grew up on Southern cooking What really sealed the deal, though, was Leonard's tour of the Irvin Rare Book Library, when Leonard saw that the university housed the works of the two writers who influenced him more than anyone else: Ernest Hemingway and Higgins.
Hemingway collector Edgar Grissom, who donated his archive to the university in 2012, showed Leonard the first editions of Hemingway. "Then Edgar pulled out a manuscript of For Whom the Bell Tolls," Peter Leonard said, "and I could see my dad's eyes light up."
Yes, I know smoking is harmful, but I had to share this author photo of Elmore Leonard. |
The destination of his archive was now clear. "There was Hemingway, there was Higgins, and I think all of these things just had an impact," Peter Leonard said.
"He was swept away," McNally said, "by the collections, and what we're trying to do here in this library. We don't have all the money that the Ransom Center has, but we take a real personal approach with our writers. We make a real commitment to them, that we're not just going to take the collections and put them on a dusty shelf and forget about them."
On the plane back home, Peter Leonard asked his father what he thought of South Carolina. "That's where I want my papers to go," he said.
Some of Elmore Leonard's works |
Peter Leonard, who is also a novelist, admits South Carolina is not the first place you think of a writer whose novels are neck-deep in the crime and corruption of inner-city Detroit. "Friends of mine have said, 'Why South Carolina?' Because it doesn't really make a lot of sense until you know everything."
"It's kind of hard, when you're a favorite son of Michigan, to leave it," Sutter said. "It's not that they didn't have the facilities or the energy to do it. This university is dedicated to creating multiple collections in crime fiction and this acquisition is only going to help them get more."
"I didn't know he had any particular connection to the University of South Carolina," said Penzler. "But I couldn't think of a greater library for those papers to go to. The fact he's associated with Hemingway and Fitzgerald and other significant American writers, I think really does show the level of respect and admiration that Elmore Leonard is getting and richly deserves."
The above is printed in full with permission.
www.free-times.com/blogs/usc-scores-collection-of-crime-writer-elmore-leonard-101614
For more, go to:
www.elmoreleonard.com
I wanted to share this with SS readers, but please don't think I "copped out" by simply copying and pasting Mr. Welch's feature story. Since that frequently distorts format on SleuthSayers, I typed it out word-by-word. I tried to remain true to the article, but if there are any typos, please be assured they are mine, not Mr. Welch's. Since I live very near Columbia, SC, if any of you come to SC to see the collection, let me know and I'll take you out to eat some grits and pork belly.
Until we meet again, take care of . . . you.
Labels:
Elmore Leonard,
Ernest Hemingway,
F. Scott Fitzgerald,
Fran Rizer,
Peter Leonard,
Rodney Welch
Location:
Columbia, SC, USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)