Seize the Day

I changed my regular morning take-out order the other day, after many, many mornings of exactly the same, and it reminded me, out of the blue, of the opening of Heinrich Böll’s postwar novel, Billiards at Half-Past Nine.  The new guy in town, an architect, goes to the local café for breakfast, and since it’s his first time, orders something a little eccentric, trying to make an impression.  But this act of daring comes back to haunt him, because now he’s expected to get the same damn thing for breakfast for the next sixty years.  Böll also goes into a very funny sidebar about how Germans will never ask the price, when it’s not listed on the menu, for fear of embarrassing themselves.  And a common daily routine offhandedly becomes a reflection on the national character. 

Billiards at Half-Past Nine is in some ways an analog of Irwin Shaw’s novel Voices of a Summer Day.  Böll published his book in 1959, Shaw published his in 1965.  Böll was born in 1917, Shaw in 1913.  Both served in the war, Böll with the Wehrmacht, Shaw with the U.S. Army.  Both of them wrote about their experiences in the war, Böll with The Train Was on Time, Shaw with The Young Lions, and both had critical and commercial success.  (Shaw, of course, had enormous commercial success later on, with an extra helping of critical schadenfreude.)  Billiards at Half-Past Nine and Voices of a Summer Day are mid-career novels, the two writers stretching their legs but not showing strain, using a comfortable voice but not falling into lazy habits of mind.  Structurally, very similar, both books generational, but the narrative arc a single day, told in flashback and multiple POV.  In other words, very fluid and fluent, with a lot of grace notes - Dickensian, even, meant very much as a compliment, and not to imply cluttered.  The books are actually terrifically clean, tight and exact and effective, like a good pitcher in the sixth inning. 

Böll is also that generation of German writers who lived through Nazism and the war, and wrote what might be called stories of atonement, although the Germans call it die Trümmerliteratur, literature of the rubble.  Günter Grass is another – born in 1927, Grass was 17 when he was drafted into the Waffen-SS, an admission he made long afterwards – and German historical guilt is his subject.  Hans Hellmut Kirst, author of Night of the Generals, was born in East Prussia in 1914, and was not only in the military, but was a Nazi party-member.  Nobody wants to admit they’re in a club of murderers, he later said.  His books are often comically horrific, with fervent wartime Nazis effortlessly putting on sheep’s clothing for the gullible Yanks. 

 

I’ve talked about German “atonement” before.  We’d do well to remember that an entire generation of younger Germans wanted nothing whatsoever to do with regret, or war guilt, or the whole concept of collective responsibility.  They thought the Nazis were their parents’ problem, not theirs.  In the late 1960’s and early ‘70’s, when Baader-Meinhof was active, the young German Left accused the government of being riddled with Nazis – the chancellor, Kurt Kiesinger, had in fact been a party member, so the Left wasn’t all that far wrong.  My point here, is that those kids indulged their own unexamined moral superiority.  We have a similar blind spot in white America about the legacy of black slavery.  The sentiment is expressed the same way, I was never a Nazi, or I never owned slaves.  It’s got nothing to do with me, in other words.  But white Americans are the residual legatees of slavery; we’ve benefited from a system of apartheid and class warfare.  And black Americans have carried the burden of Jim Crow and race hatred.  You can’t wish it away.  American writers like Twain and Faulkner have made the case that slavery is our Original Sin, and I think much the same can be said about the historical weight of Nazism.  Writers like Böll, and Grass, and Kirst have made it their central concern to put it front-and-center in contemporary German consciousness. 

Speaking of Baader-Meinhof – I’ve said this before, too - it’s a sign of maturing political health in the German social psyche, that the toxic hand-me-downs of that era, crocodile tears over the Red Army faction, the culture of betrayal encouraged by the Stasi, the self-satisfaction of bourgeois West Germans and their condescension to Ossis, is all fair game.  I was startled when the movie Downfall was released, about Hitler in the bunker, and even more so by The Lives of Others, about the brute surveillance regime in East Germany.  In a less reflective national mood, they never would have been made.  Germans aren’t much given to inner curiosity or self-doubt, any more than Americans are. 

Only the weak accommodate history.  The bold march on. 

The Lives of Others

It's a commonplace that Germans don't like being reminded of their all-too-recent history, and like much received wisdom, there's some truth in it. Nobody likes it thrown in their face that they were complicit with deep human evil.  Every once in a while you might bump into some guy in a bierstube (I have) who served in the Wehrmacht, and makes no apologies for his war service, but we're talking about a soldier, not Waffen SS or some functionary who played his small part in the Final Solution. Young people, born after the war, get their back up if you mention Hitler and the Nazis, and demand why they should take any responsibility for the buried past---look at what you white Americans have done to the Negro, is the favored response. And of course there are people of a certain age who blame the Jews, for keeping the memory of the Holocaust alive, without feeling any embarrassment or even a twinge of irony. There's a victim psychology at work, resentful that they've been unfairly singled out, and tarred with too broad a brush. (This is second cousin to the enduring fiction that the French didn't collaborate with the Occupation, or that America First wasn't riddled with virulent anti-Semites and Nazi sympathizers.) "That was another country, and besides, the wench is dead."

So it's a fascinating development, to me, that a few German film-makers have begun to explore this willed national memory loss. DOWNFALL (2004), THE LIVES OF OTHERS (2006), and THE BAADER MEINHOF COMPLEX (2008). It amounts to a public airing of dirty laundry, and predictably, these guys have taken heat for it.


DOWNFALL is about Hitler's last days in the bunker, and the final Russian assault on Berlin. In a sense, it's a war movie, the fighting in the streets a counterweight to the claustrophobic self-delusion of the Nazi leadership, sealed off underground. It's also deeply, viscerally frightening to be trapped with these people, the impossible hope of rescue, Magda Goebbels poisoning her children, Hitler, to the end, consumed by the perfidy of the Jews. It plays like black comedy, this feverish unreality, toxic with evasion and denial, but there isn't any comic relief in sight, only bitter disgrace, and suicide, and lasting shame for the survivors. The movie was attacked by critics in Germany, not for fudging the historical record, but for 'humanizing' Hitler. A curious complaint. Bruno Ganz, a Swiss, as it happens, manages the weird trick of seeming to shrink inside his clothes, wasting away as you watch. He makes Hitler human, all right, and if anything, all too familiar. This is not a monster, or an alien presence, but a mirror of our own weakness for hatred. Hitler, seen in the flesh, and without disguise, isn't a figure in some distant landscape, the diseased nephew safely hidden in the family closet. No wonder it made Germans uncomfortable.

THE LIVES OF OTHERS and THE BAADER MEINHOF COMPLEX navigate a shifting historical landscape as well. Both are about betrayal. Both are about how Germany defines herself. And both are about doubtful orthodoxies. THE LIVES OF OTHERS takes place in East Germany in the 1980's, when Stasi informants were everywhere, and on the large scale, it's a study of life in an oppressive police state, although the major characters are actually people of privilege. In detail, though, small things matter, choices of honor, or compromise, guilty secrets, proofs of love. The moral punchline comes in a coda, after the Wall is torn down and the East German regime collapses, and old choices, large or small, can be handled like talismans.

BAADER MEINHOF is something of a cautionary tale, a Cold War story from the 1970's, about the zeal of a convert. Politics are radical and undisciplined, and a splinter faction on the Left turns to violence, a terror campaign against the neo-Fascism of the Old Guard. The security services, reading the Devil's handwriting, react with increasingly brutal tactics. The right-wing press, led by the Axel Springer newspaper chain, impatient with civil liberties, egg them on. They give the Baader-Meinhof gang its name, which over-inflates their importance, and actually generates public sympathy. The ringleaders were captured after a nationwide manhunt. Four of them were later to commit suicide in prison, which gave rise to, shall we say, unanswered questions. The legacy of Baader-Meinhof is mixed, at best.


Taken together, these three pictures don't amount to a critical mass, and nobody expects the Germans to rend their garments and beat their breasts over the crimes of their fathers, any more than you'd expect it of Americans---and everybody, let's face it, is guilty of something. The past is never a closed book. But the unexamined life, Plato tells us, isn't worth much. We don't need to be haunted by regret, or brood on the wrongs done us, or weep for the sins of men. We do require of ourselves an accounting. Choices of honor, or compromise, guilty secrets, proofs of love.