The regular readers of my blog entries (both of you) will not be surprised that my wife and I went to see Christopher Nolan's new film The Odyssey the first day it was available. We are achraeology and mythology buffs.
Short review: Not a masterpiece but not an embarrassment. To paraphrase Lincoln's book review, people who enjoy this type of film will definitely enjoy this one.
But what I want to discuss here is how, inevitably, Nolan had to make this 3,000-year-old character more palatable for a modern audience. Because Homer's Odysseus is a long way from what we would call a hero.
The very first sentence of the poem describes him with a word translators have been struggling with ever since. "A man of twists and turns." "A man skilled in all ways of contending." "That ingenious hero." "The crafty man." "The Shifty."
Emily Wilson translates it as "a complicated man," and she is worth noting because her 2012 version is the most popular these days (Nolan mentioned it in interviews) and has sold more than a walloping million copies this year alone. I imagine Christopher Nolan is on her Christmas (or Saturnalia) card list.So Odysseus is not just smart but tricky. He lies, he cons, he gloats about it, and Homer expects us to admire him for it. This doesn't fit our idea of a hero these days, so Nolan burdened the big O. with a guilty, post-traumatic conscience. Sure, the guy dreamed up ther Trojan horse, leading to the destruction of the city and the slaughter of men, women, and children, but doggone, he feels awful about it. In fact, you could argue that except for the phony horsey his wife Penelope does more tricking in the movie than her husband.
But tricksters were held in high regard in those cultures. I think one of the more interesting examples is Flavius Josephus, who was a Jewish general during the Jewish War against the Romans. He was part of a group of seventy soldiers who, trapped by the enemy, decided to commit mass suicide, killing each other, rather than surrender. When only two were left Josephus and the other survivor promptly surrendered.
How do we know about this dastardly deed? Because he bragged about it in his book The Jewish War, written while he was a guest of Vespasian who he had correctly predicted would become emperor. He knew his Roman readers would appreciate his cleverness, rather condemn his treachery.
Folk tales are full of tricksters, especially admiring those who outsmart stronger enemies: Aesops's fox, Anansi, Brer Rabbit, Loki, Puss and Boots, Jacob.
![]() |
| Actual armor from Odysseus's age |
I've been trying to think of good examples from mystery fiction. Sherlock Holmes, multiple disguises and all, seems too straight-forward to qualify. Nero Wolfe? Perry Mason? Possibly.
Jackson Lamb? Absotively.
I want to leave you with one anecdote from the Odyssey which didn't make it into the movie, not quite having that heroic vibe.
In Book Nine (where Wilson has Homer describing our guy as "the lord of liars") he talks about his ships arriving in the land of a people called the Cicones. Odysseus and his men sack the city, killing most of the men and taking the women as slaves.
But then, wouldn't you know it? The Cicones called on their allies and attack, killing many of Odysseus's men. "Poor us!" Wilson's O. laments.
Imagine the unfairness of it. You declare an enemy's ability to conduct war has been obliterated and they keep fighting back.
Thank the gods that sort of thing doesn't happen anymore.


Actually, I believe that Emily Wilson has pretty much panned the movie, considering it superficial and not at all true to the source material, poorly written, dislikes its treatment of both the women and the non-white actors, panders to mainstream audiences wanting CG effects and would have been ashamed to have written any part of it. And I have to agree -- the only slightly good thing about the movie is the last 10-15 minutes in which Odysseus gives a monologue regretting his part in the deception that led to the downfall of Troy and the effect that war has on men -- not at all true to the source material either, but at least it is relevant to our time and worth pondering..
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Rob. I think the idea that brains beats brawn is a comforting thought to impoverished humans working hard and trying get by via their grit, determination and ingenuity, all the while watching the excesses of the stupid yet powerful. And it probably played well 2,800 years ago too! BTW, YouTube keeps suggesting I watch this interview with Emily Wilson by Sarah Ruhl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmnR2mYM6oc
ReplyDeleteShe is an interesting lady. I also recommend Mary Beard and Natalie Haynes.
DeleteSorry, Anon was Robert Lopresti
DeleteMary Beard is one of the top-rank Roman historians of our day.
DeleteYour last two lines: worth reading the post just for that :) So clever.
ReplyDeleteThanks. People say the classics keep speaking to us. That part definitely had a word or two for me.
DeleteWhoops, that was Robert Lopresti.
DeleteI haven't seen The Odyssey yet, and will probably wait. But I have seen "The Return" with Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche as the aging Odysseus and cunning Penelope who has waited 20 years for him to return. That is an amazing movie. It does leave out the killing of the slave women (although not the raping of them) by the suitors. The Director is Umberto Pasolini, who focused on the heart of it: 20 years is a lot of time, a lot of change, a lot of experiences... how do you put a relationship back together. Do you?
ReplyDeleteI've heard of that one but haven't seen it. Thanks.
DeleteOh, and I agree with Melodie - your last two lines are priceless!
ReplyDeleteMaybe Nolan thinks we need to see the guy who thought up the Trojan Horse and all those clever ways to come out on top feeling bad about it the same as we write mysteries because we believe the world needs to see order being restored out of chaos, wrongs being righted, and all that, or at least we say we do.
ReplyDelete"I paint the world not as it is, but as it should be." -- Norman Rockwell
DeleteWell, there is no way to fit the whole poem into the movie so you have to pick the parts that fit what you want to say.
DeleteI have not read Wilson's translation, but I've read both Lattimore's and the Robert Fagles version from about 30 years ago (?). I thought the film was good, but not the eighth wonder of the world. The technical aspects: sound edit, film edit, make-up, costumes, cinematography, fight choreography, special effects, were worthy of award nominations.
ReplyDeleteThe acting was okay. There are at least three concrete problems in a project such as this. One is the sheer length and magnitude, another is that it's a translation, which is always subject to an individual's judgment. Remember, this is an epic POEM, so there's some attempt to maintain the rhythm, which is very difficult in another language. This translation was very colloquial (Maybe Homer is, too. Fagles's translation was, but Lattimore's was more formal and majestic). That may be true to the language, but I found it jarring when Telemachus refers to Penelope and Odysseus as "Mom" and "Dad."
The trickster/heroic certainly is a choice, made for modern audiences that might object to Odysseus's addressing Circe and Calypso as "Bitch," which is the Fagles' choice. It makes the entire adventure very misogynistic by today's standards.
Remember, too, that these people are larger than life. It's an EPIC. They're heroes, but they're below the gods, so their actions, thoughts, and emotions are constrained within fairly tight limits. I thought within those parameters, the main characters/actors did well (although I could have done with fewer tears from Anne Hatheway).
I'm not sure I agreed with Nolan's use of flashbacks and flashforwards, but that was his choice and he used it to compress or condense some episodes. It's a long poem, so you have to leave something out or make it a two-day show. Calypso and the lotus eaters were conflated, for example. No big deal.
I'm glad I saw it, and I'm telling everyone who asks that I thought it was very good.
(Since I still can't log in, this is Steve Liskow)
Of course, Homer uses flashbacks in the sense of O. telling Alcinous about his journeys, for instance. Yes, a lot of people were bothered by "Mom and Dad." It did tend to jerk one out of the fantasy.
Delete