01 November 2025

Appositive Thinking



I have become, I'm afraid, a grammar nerd. (This from someone who didn't even like English classes in high school and college.) I confess that I don't always use correct grammar, especially in speaking, but for some reason I find it fascinating, along with punctuation/spelling/capitalization/etc. To say all that another way, I regularly and happily break a number of grammar rules in my fiction writing, but I also like knowing the rules.

For that reason, I was pleased a few weeks ago to hear about a new book called Rebel with a Clause: Tales and Tips from a Roving Grammarian, by Ellen Jovin. It's a fairly long account of her travels across the country to talk with regular people in the wild about the subject of grammar and word usage. She and her husband just went around setting up a camera and a folding table (what she calls the Grammar Table) on city streets and chatting with passersby about our crazy language. The book sounded just "different" enough that I immediately ordered it, and I've read about three fourths of it so far. It's not the best resource about grammar and style that I own, but it's good and streamlined and funny, so it occurred to me to use some things from it here at SleuthSayers. 

The chapter that triggered the idea was on the subject of appositives. That was interesting to me because (1) appositives aren't something I usually think about and (2) appositives are often misused, and misused in writing rather than in speaking. In fact, I suspect that the word appositive is one of those grammar terms. like gerund, participle, etc., that very few of us remember from our school years, and even those of us who do remember it probably don't remember what it means.

So--I'm glad you asked--an appositive is a noun or phrase placed beside another noun or phrase that either explains or identifies it. Example: Joe Smith, an old friend from college, met me for lunch today. The phrase "an old friend from college" is an appositive, and renames the noun beside it (Joe Smith).

In case you're interested, that one is an unrestricted or nonessential appositive, which means it can be taken out of the sentence and the sentence will still make sense: Joe Smith met me for lunch today. "An old friend from college" is there only to add extra, bonus information. And by the way, unrestricted appositives are set off by commas.

restricted, or essential, appositive is necessary to the sentence. It provides non-optional information, and if it's removed, it changes the meaning of the sentence. Example: My friend John is out of town this week. If you take "John" out of the sentence, the reader won't know which of your friends is out of town. (Unless you have only one friend.) Restricted appositives are not framed by commas.

You can probably see how appositives can be misused.


My brother, Ed, is in jail. This is wrong if you have more than one brother.

The former Texas Ranger, Gus McCrea, is one of the most popular characters in fiction. The commas should be removed, here, because the name is essential to the meaning of the sentence. 

Last night I watched the movie, The GodfatherThis is wrong because it implies that there is only one movie, and it's The Godfather. The comma should be removed. 


Something that wasn't mentioned specifically in that chapter of the book, but that drives me crazy, is seeing sentences like the following:

Writer, Jane Doe will be the speaker at tomorrow's lunch.

That kind of mistake (two commas would be wrong; one is even worse) shows up occasionally in announcements, newsletters, blogs, articles, and so forth, and it's especially unfortunate when it happens in an otherwise reasonable author bio: Kansas resident, Jeckyl Juberkanesta is an aspiring writer of mystery/suspense . . . The fix, of course, is to remove the comma.


I must restate here that Rebel with a Clause isn't just a reference book, it's an entertaining look at people on the street and their takes on grammar in our increasingly nonliterary world. Ellen Jovin covers everything from regionalisms to apostrophes to cusswords to the Oxford Comma, and it's fun to read.

I was going to go into some controversial grammar topics, like who/whom, em-dash/en-dash/hyphen, text-speech, etc. especially since my latest sermon on semicolon use was in October 2020 (I think writers should all have a semicolonoscopy every five years), but then I figured I should maybe leave well enough alone. 

Meanwhile, what do you think, about appositives? Or should I ask, Have you ever thought about them at all? Do you wish you weren't thinking of them now?


Whatever the case, keep writing! I'll be back in two weeks.


19 comments:

  1. John, I haven't read the book yet, but Jovin and her husband came to our city and spoke at the local premiere of the movie Rebel With A Clause. Her husband filmed and directed her 50-state grammar tabling. I highly recommend the movie, and if you can see them live, even better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rob, I'm glad to hear you've seen the documentary--I've heard it's great. I finished the book last night, and enjoyed it.

      I've forgotten where I first heard about the book--maybe from the Short Mystery Fiction Society discussion list--but I'm glad I bought it. I thought it was cool finding out so much about what the regular guy/gal-on-the-street thinks about the subject of grammar--and that so many people even think about it at all!

      Delete
  2. John, thanks for the tip. I look forward to reading the book. As a former English instructor, I’m familiar with appositives and grit my teeth when they’re punctuated incorrectly. I see commas abused and misused so much that I often wonder if anyone cares anymore. Your topic is timely and apposite.
    Edward Lodi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Edward, I would think you, as a former English teacher, would love the book. If you read it, let me know what you think of it. Something I found interesting was that the author is open-minded about certain rules of grammar, and surprisingly forgiving of some mistakes that I have trouble forgiving. Yes, consider me a fellow teeth-gritter.

      Delete
  3. I'm laughing at your line "Do you wish you weren't thinking of them now?" haha- I taught grammar at college. Enough said. The number of times I hit my sore head after asking my students: What is a sentence? And hearing "um...It's a complete thought?" sigh-smile

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Melodie, I bet you could write a book of your own, about those experiences! I don't doubt your head is sore by now.

      I wish I had seen the documentary Rob mentioned, about this Grammar Lady--I hope to do that soon. She's fascinating.

      Delete
  4. When I was in ninth grade, my English teacher asked me, "What case is an appositive in?" I was so baffled that I didn't even point out that she ended her sentence with a preposition.
    I know the answer now, but I have never had occasion to use it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! That was a missed opportunity, Steve! You should've said, "I don't have the answer for which you're looking."

      The whole subject of ending a sentence with a preposition is interesting. I was pleased to find that the Grammar Lady doesn't mind that at all.

      Delete
  5. Hi John, bit of an aside, but your article made me wonder how many other grammar rules I've forgotten since the days of grade school. Many, I would wager. Some I know exist, but simply can no longer name. Like adjective order. You say, "John was visited by forty, tiny, green aliens last night." You wouldn't say "John was visited by tiny, forty, green aliens last night." That rule has a name, but damn if I can recollect it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Dan! I too wonder about those old grammar rules. I'm sure I've forgotten even more of them than I've broken, which is a lot. (This book at least reminded me of some of them.)

      As for that example, I think it's called the Castro Adjective-Stacking Rule.

      Thanks as always!

      Delete
  6. John, I'd forgotten what appositives were, or maybe I never knew, but it drives me crazy to see those unnecessary commas. Btw, in your reply to Rob, surely you meant that you finished the book and enjoyed it. Dependent clause. No comma. (OT: Do you know where the line, "Smile when you say that," comes from?) And one more thing: my take on ending sentences with prepositions is that it's standard in American English, incorrect in British English. That ought to make everyone happy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Virginian. (had to, Liz - you know me!) Melodie

      Delete
    2. Hey Liz. As for my commas, etc., I forgot to mention, please don't examine MY writing for proper grammar use--I'd be a terrible example. Do as I say and not as I do.

      "Smile when you say that" is from The Virginian, right? I have it here on my shelf!

      Ah, yes, ending sentences with a preposition. As it turns out, LOTS of things are allowed in American English but not in British, and this book points a lot of them out. (Or points out a lot of them. This is the kind of craziness up with which I will not put.)

      Delete
  7. I, too, have read Rebel with a Clause, and I enjoyed it.

    I regularly battle with improperly used appositives in the stories I edit, though I can never remember that they are called appositives.

    Another interesting book, if you really want to geek out, is Shady Characters by Keith Houston. It traces the history of common and uncommon symbols such as @, #, *, and more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, Michael, I shouldn't have said NEW book--it was published two or three years ago. It was just new to me. Glad to hear you enjoyed it as well.

      And whoa, I have not read, or even heard of, the Houston book. It's now on my list. I haven't ordered a book from the Zon in several days, so they're probably getting worried about me.

      Thank you as always.

      Delete
  8. The perils of old age, but in (I think) the most recent QI-XL (TV programme here in the UK) - the series is now up to the letter 'W', by the way - stated that, originally, grammar was defined and refined by Victorian mathematicians, who wanted hard and fast 'controlling' rules.

    Yet, you have 'evolutionary' changes, such as the disappearing semicolon, a 3-dot ellipsis at the end of a sentence (used to be ellipsis + full stop) ... (er) .

    But the one I've always found useful (both from a writer and a setter/printer PoV) is The Chicago Manual of Style (Elliot Spencer)

    Of course, the one thing worse than Grammar, is Grampa with a shotgun...

    John Connor
    Chief Cook and Bottlewasher
    Murderous Ink Press
    Crimeucopia – What The Butler Didn’t See – out now
    Crimeucopia – You Ain’t Read Nothin’ Yet – due 4th November 2025
    Crimeucopia – Can You Dig It? – due 13th January 2026
    Crimeucopia – A Coterie Of Dicks – due March 2026
    Crimeucopia – New Kids In da Hood – due June 2026
    Crimeucopia – Maple Leaf Ragging – due September 2026
    Crimeucopia – Objection! Overruled! – due November 2026

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John, I'm just grateful that you don't require us to meet all those British grammar rules, when we submit stories to you. I would be sure to forget a favourite or a colour, etc., and some of those "outside the quotation marks" rules of punctuation. And several things that I didn't know before, like--as I learned from Ms. Jovin's book--occasionally using "which" for "that," etc., etc. As for The Chicago Manual of Style, I have one of those right here, and use it all the time. (Lots of difference between it and the AP style manual.)

      As for all the evolutionary changes in language, I have trouble even keeping up with those. One of the hardest for me is the suddenly acceptable use of plural pronouns in things like "Everyone take their seats." Oh well. I'll get there.

      Thanks as always for visiting SleuthSayers.

      Delete
  9. Ironically, appositives are one of the few grammar issues I don't have. Interjecting details into the right part of the sentence bears no issue for me, but the comma can be a whole different issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Justin, you're aren't alone. Comma usage creates problems for a great many writers. In recent years, I think I've managed to cut back a little on my commas--it seems I used to put them in at every possible opportunity. And I'm doing especially well at weeding out my semicolons--I'm down to one or two a month now, and I feel better as a result. (Hear that, Josh Pachter? You'd be proud of me!)

      Delete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>