29 August 2026

If You Don't Know Your Burro from a Burrow



For today's post, I'm updating and expanding a column I wrote for the Criminal Brief mystery blog many moons ago. If you never saw that post I'm not surprised, and if you did see it and still don't remember it, I don't blame you. I barely remember it myself, and I wrote it. But some of the points it illustrated seem to be as applicable to our writing and to our use of language now as they were back then, and I look forward to seeing what you might think of them. So here goes:


Two guys are sitting in a tavern, sipping their beers. One says to the other, "See that girl at the end of the bar? I think I'll ask her for a date."

The second guy takes a look and says, "Forget it. She won't be interested."

"How do you know?"

"Because she's a lesbian."

"So?" the first guy says. "It won't matter. Watch this."

He stands, struts over to the young lady, leans on the bar, and says, "Hi, darlin'. How are things in Beirut?"


Yes, I know, it's an old joke, and dumb too. But I think, as mentioned above, it makes a point. The point is,  most of us don't have very good vocabularies.

With the assistance of several books and articles on the subject, I have attempted to list a few word-choice and style mistakes we writers often make--and how to avoid them. Among my references are Lapsing Into a Comma and The Elephants of Style by Bill Walsh, "Words That Wound" from the now-defunct Byline Magazine, and Woe Is I by Patricia T. O'Conner.

NOTE: Some of the following are firm rules, and some are informed opinions. Others are my own opinions, which are usually uninformed. As an example, I have writer friends who insist that T-shirts should be tee shirts, or just tees; I don't agree, but I do think it's good to hear and consider others writers' and readers' observations on that and on other matters of word usage. I ain't no grammar policeman, but I do know people who is.

Continuous/continual -- Continuous means without interruption. Continual means frequently or often repeated. The entire film was made up of one continuous scene. The bill died after continual objections. 

Historic/historical -- Historic means something that's famous or important. Historical just means something that happened in the past. My book launches were historical events; the Apollo launches were historic events.

Hone in/home in -- You can hone your knife or your skills, but you can't hone in on something. The investigator homed in on the fact that Judy was in town the night of the murder. Think homing beacons.

Till -- The word till is an informal version of until, not a contraction ('til), and is perfectly acceptable. We'll stay here till you get back.

Minuscule -- Spelling hint: When something's minuscule, it's minus (lacking) size.

May/might -- Sometimes they mean the same thing. Often, though, may involves permission and might involves possibility. Jimmy may go to the movies (his mom's allowing him to). Jimmy might go to the movies (he hasn't decided).

Data and media -- These are collective nouns, and should be treated as singular. The data is conclusive. The media has arrived. Bill Walsh of The Washington Post said writers who use them as plurals are educated but misguided, and Patricia O'Conner noted that data seems to have gone the way of agenda, opera, and insignia--technically plural words than have become singular nouns. By the way, as an old IBMer I prefer the pronunciation dayta instead of datta. But that's just me.

Ringer/wringer -- I've recently seen many writers refer to someone under pressure as being "put through a ringer." I think that should be wringer, because I think the expression refers to a squeezing device like the wringers on old-timey washing machines. I think of a ringer as either a lookalike, a secret substitute into a competition, or the guy who pulls the bell rope. Same thing applies to wracking/racking my mind for an answer. I vote for the w.

Toward/towards -- They mean the same thing. Toward is preferred in American English, towards in British English. So I lean toward toward

Hung/hanged -- Unless capital punishment is involved, hung is the correct past tense of hang. Anyone who thinks otherwise should be hanged. Where are the grammar cops when you need 'em?

Flammable/inflammable -- They mean exactly the same thing. Both describe something that can easily catch fire and burn quickly.

Invite -- This is a verb that shouldn't be used as a noun. You didn't receive an invite to Jane's party; you received an invitation to Jane's party.

Winch/wench -- A winch is a mechanical device used for pulling/lifting. A wench is an old-fashioned and insulting term for a woman, often in a tavern. I've seen this misused many times in beginners' manuscripts. 

Fellowship and dialogue -- These are among those nouns that should not be used as verbs. We'll fellowship at the church at seven p.m. Should we dialogue about that? No, you shouldn't. By the way, I'm also not wild about using impact as a verb. Our weatherman said we might be impacted by rain today. If it were an asteroid I might agree, but rain? As I've mentioned before, we have a lot of doctors and nurses in our family, and to me, anyone who's impacted is having some serious bathroom issues. (Picture that the next time a news anchor mentions it.)

Accommodate -- Spelling hint: It's big enough to accommodate two c's and two m's.

Ensure/insure -- The way I remember this is, use insure if money or finance is involved. If not, ensure that you use ensure.

Imply/infer -- A speaker implies; a listener infers.

Into/in to -- You get into your car and drive in to your office. If you drive into your office, it's time for new brakes, or new glasses. 

Peaked my interest -- Should be piqued my interest.

For all intensive purposes -- Should be for all intents and purposes.

Give them free reign -- Should be give them free rein. I suspect this misuse is because the word reign involves a king or a ruler.

With baited breath -- Should be with bated breath. Unless you've eaten a can of worms.

T-shirt/tee shirt -- T-shirt is correct. Hint: When it's spread out, it looks like the letter T.

Nauseated/nauseous -- Nauseated means you're sick. Nauseous means you're making me sick. Consider this before telling someone your wife is nauseous.

Momentarily -- It means for a moment. It doesn't mean soonWhen he saw Judy, he hesitated momentarily. But if the pilot says, "We'll be in the air momentarily," get off the plane and take a bus.

When choosing whether to use a or an, the pronunciation of the following word--not the spelling--is what matters most. An hour and a half. A European vacation. Please include an SASE.

Convince/persuade -- Convince involves thought; persuade involves action. She convinced him she was right. He persuaded her to drive him home.

All right/alright -- All right is the preferred and accepted usage. Just remember, alright is not all right. 

Ironic -- A tornado during your wedding ceremony might be tragic, but it's not ironic. Getting run over by a Budweiser truck on your way to an AA meeting is ironic.

Fewer/less -- I'm sure you know this already, but fewer involves units, less involves amounts. I have fewer bills and fewer coins in my pocket, so I have less cash in my pocket.

Articles, prepositions, and conjunctions used in the titles of books, movies, etc., are usually capitalized if they contain four or more letters. Wait Until Dark, From Russia With Love, The Night Before Christmas. But I go back and forth on this one, when the preposition is only four words. Sometimes I use Gone With the Wind and sometimes Gone with the Wind.

Between/among -- We all know the rule here--but between can also be used for three or more units when talking about physical relationships. Sand gets between your toes, not among them (even if you have more than two toes).

Everyday/every day -- Everyday is an adjective, period. You don't get out of bed everyday. You get out of bed every day, and put on your everyday shoes.

Blond/blonde -- I've always agreed with Michael Bracken's submission guidelines on this one: Blond is an adjective, blonde is a noun. The blonde has blond hair. 

Straitjacket and straitlaced -- There's no gh in either one. Strait comes from the Latin strictus, which means constricted or tight. Think Strait of Hormuz.

Ingenious/ingenuous -- Ingenious means brilliant (it has the pronunciation of the word genius built in). Ingenuous means candid or innocently open (ingenue is a word for an inexperienced girl). 

Loath/loathe -- Loath is an adjective meaning unwilling. Loathe is a verb meaning dislike. I am loath to tell you how much I loathe the misuse of these words.

Comprise/compose -- Comprise means to include, and compose means to make up. According to The Elements of Stylea zoo comprises animals, but animals compose a zoo

If you're adding ed or ing or er to a verb, double a single final consonant only if the accent is on the final syllable. Canceled, traveled, patrolled, controlled. Words like transferred and kidnapped are exceptions because (I assume) they might otherwise be mispronounced. This is another of those rules that I sometimes obey and sometimes ignore, depending on which way the wind happens to be blowing at the time. I know, for instance, that either traveled or travelled is acceptable.

Some words, like irregardless, utilize, orientate, preplanning, preregister, and preventative, probably shouldn't be used at all. I'm fairly certain anyone who speaks or writes the word utilize just wants to sound more intelligent than he is, because use always means exactly the same thing as utilize, and is four letters and two syllables shorter. And I love this quote from The Elephants of Style regarding the phrase per se: "It means 'in itself.' But beware: Even when used correctly, it identifies the speaker or writer as a geeky, pretentious high-school student." And don't even get me started on OVERuse. I'm sick and tired of overused words and phrases like breaking news, stunning video, due diligence, deep dive, journey, amazing, paradigm, chapter, awesome, synergy, and, yes, impacted.

What are your thoughts on all this? Do you agree with any of them? Disagree? Do they make you either nauseated or nauseous? Can you think of other words/phrases often misused or overused?


I'll close with a wise note from The UPI Stylebook: "A burro is an ass. A burrow is a hole in the ground. As a writer you are expected to know the difference."







 



 

21 comments:

  1. After editing and reading a lot of fiction, I've found that the biggest problem usually isn't ignorance of grammar rules so much as writers not stopping to consider whether the word they've chosen actually means what they think it means.

    "Home in" and "hone in" is a good example, as are "piqued my interest," "bated breath," and "rein/reign." Those slips can pull a careful reader completely out of a scene.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. They're worse than mere typos, which a reader might forgive (at least if there aren't too many). And you can't depend on things like SpellCheck, etc., to catch the mistakes because the wrong words are still real words.

      Thanks for the thoughts.

      Delete
  2. John, I agree with everything you mentioned, especially nauseated and nauseous. (About a year ago I mentioned my dislike for the misuse in a comment here.) Flammable
    used to be the correct term. You’d see it on tank trucks transporting gasoline. But folks thought “in” meant “not,” so the word was changed to flammable.

    I’d add “It’s a doggy dog world” to your list.

    Edward Lodi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! I didn't think of that one, Edward. You're right, it's a doggy dog world out there. And I didn't know about the change of the wording on the tank trucks. Makes sense!

      I can't help thinking of the guy who had come to a party alone and was asked about his missing wife. He replied, "She's nauseous." The person who had asked said, "She certainly is."

      Delete
  3. Melodie Campbell29 August, 2026 09:00

    Great column John! You've reminded me of a hilarious warning sign error in my city here. Posted all around the place: "Coyotes may be present." My question to the communications dept (did nobody there take English??) was "Who gave them permission?" smile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Melocie. I'll have to remember the coyote sign! The wording on signs is a whole different thing--I love it.

      In fact, I feel a future SleuthSayers post coming on . . .

      Delete
    2. Sorry. I actually do know how to spell your name.

      Delete
  4. I love lists like this, John. I prefer plural verbs with data, but as Garner notes in the Chicago Manual of Style, they should be reserved for technical contexts and used consistently. I referred to Bill Walsh's book when I worked as an editor and once emailed him a question, which he was gracious enough to answer. He died way too soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Tom--thank you for stopping in, here.

      Good thought, regarding the use of singular/plural verbs with the word data--I'm glad you pointed that out. Yes, in a technical manual, etc., I can see using the plural form. (I actually wrote a section of an IBM manual, years before any of many fictional efforts, and even though I was familiar with the subject matter, it's the only writing I've ever done that wasn't fun. I admire those who can do it well.)

      I wish I could've met Walsh. I've taken a lot of his (written) advice, and yes, we lost him too soon.

      Delete
  5. And then there's the sensuous / sensual; the first meaning giving pleasure to the senses and the second, pleasure in the sexual sense.
    Which leads to the reminder that "hung" has other meanings in other situations, from a picture on a wall to the stud in the movie...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Eve. You're right--those are often misused. And I'm sure there are many more I didn't think of. Another that only just occurred to me is beatific (happy or angelic)/beautific (variant of beautiful)..

      As for "hung," I'll just remember that any usage not involving neck-stretching is "hung."

      Thank you as always.

      Delete
  6. Lots of interesting points here. Some I knew; some I didn't. (blond, blonde -- never really thought about it). But one thing you mentioned that always drives me nuts is people who say '"That's an historic event." Please! It's "a" historic event! Did you ever read an history book? Did you ever meet an hysterical person? (excuse me while I get a little hysterical!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob, the a/an thing is crazy--as you said, I think "an historic event" sounds strange, but SO many people say it. I guess they consider the "h" to be almost silent, there. I remember my mom always pronounced humble as "umble" without the "h." To me, the word honor has a silent "h" but words like humble and historic do not, and would require "a" rather than "an."

      And don't get isterical.

      Delete
  7. One more that makes me scream at the TV more and more often, infamous. People seem to think it means you're famous in a good way. It means you're famous in a bad way, notorious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaye, I agree on "infamous." And one of my biggest pet peeves is the overuse of "iconic." I have simply heard it TOO MANY TIMES. Sounds like you and I both need to take it easy and step away from that TV, ma'am.

      Delete
  8. "Dayta" is correct, John (according to the Chavis Collegiate Dictionary). ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yay for Chavis! As an olden-days computer guy, datta just sounds so unbelievably silly, to me.

      Delete
  9. John, I agree with most of your opinions and caveats, but if you didn't update the original Criminal Brief column, it may have been a mistake. So many nouns have migrated into general usage as verbs that some of them need to be accepted. (No, not "invite," but I'm sure everyone can think of examples.) And while I'm with you on "all right" vs "alright," editors, publishers, and computer programming aren't letting us use the correct two-word locution any more, along with "any more," which they insist is "anymore" regardless of meaning. Does it make sense to say, "I don't want anymore cookies, thank you"? Try to tell AI or predictive Spellcheck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're so right, Liz. (Yes, I did do extensive updates to that pore ole CB column--hard to believe that was so long ago. Most of what I retained was the burro/burrow title.)

      The migration/evolution you mentioned is certainly happening, and I understand that I'm having to change some of my thinking. But I'm so pleased that you mentioned "anymore." NO, it does not make sense to write "anymore cookies," no matter what AI and SpellCheck say. The one hardest thing for me to get used to might be the acceptance of "their" instead of "his" or "her." Yes, I understand the reasoning, but I'm still not fond of sentences like the following: "The suspect was shot, and they died." That sounds to me as if more than one person might've died.

      Big sigh.

      Delete
  10. I'm only starting to feel that I understand grammar in the last couple of years. Thanks to Grammarly, lessons on Quill.org from last year, and the really useful manuscript formatting techniques I learned from John Connor at Murderous Ink Press.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you, Justin. Making sure the grammar's right in your manuscripts will pay off. Keep at it!

      Thanks as always for chiming in, here.

      Delete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>