|Not the burger, but |
I don't want to get sued.
It's the same in entertainment. Sex and violence. If things get slow, throw in a naked woman. Or an explosion. Or a riff of automatic weapons. (Speaking of which, I'm sure you heard about the 9-year-old girl at a shooting range outside Las Vegas who accidentally killed the instructor with the Uzi he was showing her how to use. 9 year olds and Uzis, what could possibly go wrong? We don't even let 9 year olds drive, even here in South Dakota, where 14 years old get learner's permits, so what the hell was he thinking... Okay, enough rant on that...)
Back to sex and violence. Much safer. Now I understand that sex and violence are what titillates the masses, including you and me, but sometimes I want something more: plot; wit; character; nuance. By the way, I watched an interesting review of "Outlander", the new series based on the Diana Gabaldon time-traveling fantasy series, in which the sole woman on the panel pointed out that, while this show was obviously being marketed to heterosexual women (hot men in kilts and all that), when it came down to it, there were a heck of a lot of naked women in it and no naked men. Now what's that about? Couldn't it even occur to the producers (6 out of 8 male) that (most) women prefer naked men?
Okay, back to character. I've been binge-watching Michael Gambon's 1990's Maigret, and enjoying it heartily. (I love reading Maigret, too - it's one of the main reasons and ways that I've learned to read French.) And I noticed something that hadn't really struck me before: Jules Maigret is normal. He's a good, decent, bourgeois man who drinks/eats/smokes a little more than he should but not too much, who loves his wife, and who really likes his co-workers (except for the examining magistrates). He likes people generally, including most of the petty criminals he deals with. And yet he's absolutely real, grounded in details and mannerisms and nuances that are very subtle. In other words, he's an old-fashioned hero. It's very refreshing.
But I think too many "heroes" have been run through our jalepeno culture. I've seen too damned many lead characters who are damaged addicts (alcohol/drugs/gambling/sex), and/or whose significant other was brutally murdered by a mysterious serial killer, and/or who are promiscuous to hide their longing for love or their lack of ability to love, and/or who has significant PTSD and/or traumatic childhood experiences and/or mental illness and/or OCD/bi-polar/etc., and almost ALL of them are obnoxious to everyone around them (and yet are mysteriously loved despite of it)... Folks, that isn't character, that's a laundry list. What started out as an exception - with the ability to shock, startle, amaze, entertain - has become the norm, which means... well, cheese and jalapenos on everything.
At the same time, I can enjoy a good noir with the rest of them, and God knows in Dashiell Hammett's and Raymond Chandler's world, everyone is crooked as they come, and that's fine with me. Because Spade and Marlowe longed for heroism and decency, like thirsty men for water, and tried to be knights errant, even if their armor was more tarnished than shining. That's what I want in my hero, at the very minimum. I want them to recognize honor when they see it, like Silver-Wig in "The Big Sleep", and to be able - at least some times - to resist treachery and temptation, like Brigid O'Shaughnessy in "The Maltese Falcon." I want them to know the difference between good and evil, in the world and in themselves. I want them to care about the difference between good and evil, in the world and in themselves. I want them to want to be a hero, even when they fail.
Maigret. D. C. Foyle. Miss Marple. Guido Brunetti. Nancy Drew. Columbo. V. I. Warshawski. Archie Goodwin. Perry Mason. Endeavour Morse. And many others, rich in variety, style, wit, character... Excuse me, I have some more reading to do. And tonight - another Maigret!