I’ve been tying my own shoes for about 70 years, give or take. In that time, I’ve always preferred to include a double knot following the basic bow for added security. When my son was a little boy, he called this extra precaution a “daddy knot”. I’d do the honors, since it took a while for him to master it.
In all that time untying my laces, I’ve pulled a loose end, which released the whole knot, quickly and simply. Though it often didn’t, instead, tightening the knot further. This led me to use fingernails and grit to complete the task, in a much more laborious operation. I frequently wondered why sometimes the free lace untied the knot, and sometimes it didn’t. I began to believe that I must have been tying the laces in different ways at different times, and in the back of my mind, promised myself to delve more deeply into this mystery when I had a ridiculous amount of spare time.
Then
the other day, on my 75th birthday, I pulled at one of the loose
ends, which tightened the knot, then chose to pull the other one, which
released it. I thought, huh. Is that the answer? I realized I’ve tied my laces exactly
the same way since early childhood. The difference is that one end works great at
freeing the knot when you pull it, and the other works at cross purposes. It only took most of my years on earth to figure this
out. Discounting a few occasions when I
went barefoot or wore flip flops, or loafers, I’ve probably had the opportunity to discover
this simple truth about 24 thousand times (rough estimate by a non-mathematician.)
This
was sobering. I wondered what other
solutions to common problems have been lurking there, staring me in the face
for my entire life. What else did I
miss?
I’ve
written a lot of stuff since I learned how to do it. I feel in some ways, I’ve gotten better at it, and in other ways, continue to fall short. I’ve read masterful writers and think, how do
they do it? What do they know that I don’t? Do I need to learn how to pull the right shoelace
instead of the wrong one I’ve been pulling for my entire life?
I
like to study brain science, because who doesn’t? One of the things I’ve learned is that the
brain prefers to follow pathways that it’s already established when assembling a
thought or initiating a behavior. This
is because the brain consumes a disproportionate percentage of the resources we
require to exist, so it’s always looking for more efficient ways to accomplish
day-to-day responsibilities. Carving out new routes is harder than trekking
along familiar highways, thus more energy conserving. They call it habituation, and there’s no
shame in it. It’s just how we’re wired.
When
you’re 75 years old, simple activities take on greater significance,
since there are fewer important enterprises to focus on. As a good German/Anglo-Saxon, I strive to
make each of these more efficient, or less onerous, or more engaging, depending
on the task. Nobody but me cares about
this, and neither should they.
One
of my favorite books from my early reading years was John Barth’s The
Floating Opera. He published it when
he was in his early twenties, remarkable enough. One of the protagonist’s practices
was to intentionally make or break a habit as a matter of regular pratice. This is the sort of wisdom that should be
reserved for people far older than 20-something Barth. He proposed that we should stop every once in
a while and ask ourselves if we’re thinking something or doing something
because it’s a good idea, or because our neural pathways are forcing us into
lazy mental processing.
Keeping an open mind is a whole lot harder than it sounds. It’s almost impossible, no matter how much we revere the disposition. Aside from the tyranny of our brain’s energy conservation there are social pressures to conform to certain established norms. We like keeping the goodwill of our friends and family, so adventurous deviations, just for the hell of it, have their costs.
Family
members in particular are threatened by sudden changes in course. Their first thought is, “Uh-oh, Dad is
getting wifty.” But unless
these loved ones are also your editors, changing up your approach to writing
shouldn’t fire up any alarms. Your
family hasn’t paid enough attention along the way to notice anyway. You’re just the granddad, or grandmother,
huddled over the keyboard in your little corner of the house like you always do.
Following
John Barth’s advice, I’ve been dabbling in habit making and breaking. One of the most salubrious outcomes is
realizing that some habits are very valuable and hard won. You get a chance to recommit to certain
things, because you’ve given them a fair appraisal. You feel more secure in certain beliefs after
they’ve been stress-tested and found to be worthy.
You
begin to realize that “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”,
but so is a promiscuous sampling of all the less beneficial options available.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome. Please feel free to comment.
Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.
She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.
You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>