When we categorize fiction, we usually say it's either short or long, literary or genre, lighthearted or gritty, mystery or SF, etc.--but there's another distinction: Is it a series story or a standalone story?
Most of my short stores are standalones, meaning they're not part of an ongoing series using the same characters and locations. I like writing standalone stories because the plots and players are always new and interesting to explore. I can go anyplace I want to, in any time period, and live there for a while. ("A while" being the key phrase. That's probably the reason I'd rather write shorts than novels.)
Series differences
Having said that … I occasionally like to write "series" stories as well. One reason is that some characters and some settings turn out to be interesting and/or enjoyable enough (to me, at least) that I want to revisit them from time to time. Another is that a number of editors have told me that they, and their readers, like short-story series--and I'm not one to ignore that kind of hint. A third reason is that series installments (if they're subsequent stories and not the very first in the series) are sometimes easier to put together because both I and the reader already know the characters, and I can spend less time with setup and backstory and more time developing the plot--and plotting is probably my favorite part of writing. This works especially well if the stories are really short, as is the case of markets like Woman's World. I have found, though, that when I do write series stories, I tend to not write several in a row. I almost always sandwich one or more standalones in between series installments. That just seems to work better, for me.
I should also mention that there's one thing you have to consider with series stories that you don't have to worry about with standalones: continuity. If you're lucky enough to sell a few stories in a series, you'll find that you must keep careful track of facts about your recurring characters (primary and supporting), and locations and relationships as well. You don't want to carelessly change, say, the names of certain people, streets, restaurants, bars, and businesses later in the series. And if it seems that things like that would be easy for the writer to remember--well, they're not. You also don't want to repeat certain phrases, descriptions, or anything that might seem too repetitive, from story to story. Another thing to remember: Not everyone will read those installments in order. Every story in the series should be written such that it can stand on its own.
One more point. I'm not quite sure how to say this, but there seems to be a different feeling that goes along with the writing of each of these two kinds of stories. When I begin a standalone story I get a little tingle of adventure and daring and experimentation, of trying something brand new. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds, but it's true.) On the other hand, when I begin a series story, I feel more comfortable and secure because I'm on familiar ground--I already know the characters pretty well, and how they think and how they'll act. I'm not saying one "feeling" is better or worse than the other. Both are welcome, because they make me want to keep writing.
Series notes and numbers
Personally, I have written and published eight different series of mystery shorts. The first of them began in 2001, with a bossy retired schoolteacher named Angela Potts, a character based roughly on my mother. Mom wasn't bossy and she wasn't a teacher, but she was quick-witted and she was curious about everything and everyone in my little hometown--she loved sitting in one particular rocker on her front porch and observing the neighborhood and every single car and pedestrian that passed by. Nothing happened in that town that she didn't know about.
So that's what got me started. But Mom's similarity to my protagonist ended there. My fictional heroine not only knows what's happening, she also doesn't mind interfering with those happenings, and investigating anything she finds the least bit suspicious. She especially enjoys "helping"--and irritating--the local sheriff, who was a student of hers in the fifth grade. Sheriff Charles "Chunky" Jones always allows her to butt into police business, not because he wants to but because he knows that "Ms. Potts" is smart and cunning enough to solve cases that he can't. Having his procedures criticized and his grammar corrected at every turn is, he figures, a small price to pay. So far, I've had more than 150 stories published about those two characters and their little Southern town, most of them mini-mysteries at Woman's World.
In 2003 I started a different series of stories, this one about a small-town sheriff named Lucy Valentine and her mother Frances. Like Angela Potts, Fran Valentine is a former teacher, and in her retirement she's concerned mostly with two things: (1) assisting in the never-ending fight against crime and (2) finding Lucy a husband. (The first is easier than the second, since her daughter doesn't want a husband.) Around 100 of those Fran & Lucy stories, sometimes billed as the "Law and Daughter" series, have been published in more than a dozen different magazines, seven anthologies, and three story collections. (Woman's World published one of the Fran & Lucy stories in 2010, but the then-editor told me she'd rather I go back to the Angela mysteries, so I did.)
My third crime series, and one of those I've enjoyed the most, features Mississippi sheriff Raymond Kirk Douglas ("Please, no more Spartacus jokes") and his on-and-off girlfriend Jennifer Parker, who's a former lawyer and Ray's childhood sweetheart. Seven of these stories, which are much longer than most of my mysteries, have been published in Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine and one in the short-lived Down & Out: The Magazine--and the latest installment is now hanging around in the AHMM submission queue. the Ray Douglas stories have been extra fun to write because most of them include not one mystery case but two or three different cases per story.
My fourth series stars private investigator Thomas Langford, and also features a female partner-in-crime-solving: Tom's fiancee Debra Jo Wells, a paralegal at a local law firm. The first installment of that series was published in a special PI issue of Black Cat Mystery Magazine, and holds a glowing place in my heart (thank you, Michael Bracken) because it won a Shamus Award in 2021. The next Tom Langford mystery appeared in Strand Magazine, the third in Black Cat Weekly (thanks again, Michael), and three more installments have been accepted for an upcoming collection of my detective stories. (I should note that, as usual, Tom's female counterpart is smarter than he is, and he knows it. After all, our stories are supposed to reflect real life . . .)
My fifth mystery series revolves around accountant Katie Rogers and her younger sister Anna, the police chief in (you guessed it) their small Southern town--three of the Katie & Anna stories have also appeared in Woman's World. My sixth series features Old West private investigator Will Parker, whose first story (actually a novella) appeared in one of John Connor's Crimeucopia anthologies; the second story was published in a private-eye anthology and was later selected for inclusion in Best American Mystery Stories. My seventh crime series stars New Orleans shopowner Madame Zoufou, Queen of Voodoo, who has made three appearances so far, one of them in a Mardi Gras anthology. And my eighth series features private eye Luke Walker and his sister Lavinia (Vinnie), and is set in the 1940s in New Orleans. The first of those appeared in an anthology of stories by previous Edgar- or Shamus-winners, the second has been accepted and is upcoming in an anthology based on S.S. Van Dine, and the third is in progress.
In summary, six of my eight mystery series are set in the present day, two are set in the past, seven are set in the southeastern U.S., three are about county sheriffs, three are about PIs, one's about a police chief, and one's about a voodoo sorceress, with helpful partners and amateur sleuths joining the cast in all of them.
What's your story?
So that's my background, with regard to series. How about the rest of you? Do you prefer writing standalone stories or series installments? Do you like reading short-story series? Do you have any favorites? If you've written series stories, are they set in a familiar (to you) area? Are they written with particular publications or markets in mind? Have you found that writing them is more fun than standalones? Which do you find easier to write? Have you found series stories easier to sell?
Whatever your experience is and your preferences are, I hope you keep reading stories and keep putting them on paper.
I'll be back in two weeks. See you then.
Most of my series stories are set in small town Laskin, SD (fictional place), with Sergeant Grant Tripp, Clerk of Courts Linda Thompson, Detective Jonasson, and the Davison crime family who is very prolific but some work both sides of the law, especially John Davison. Siv is the dangerous one.
ReplyDeleteI also have written a short series (3 stories so far) with Crow Woman and Dark That Rides. Crow Woman is a Native American woman who was born some... hundred or so years ago? But is maintained in life by Dark That Rides, who is not from this world, and is not safe to actually see: a terrifying good. Crow Woman often helps children, and occasionally an adult, from imminent danger, or at least tries to.
And there are also a lot of standalones, which are indeed fun and interesting to write.
Love your stuff!
Thanks, Eve. I've found writing my series stories are a lot easier when they're set close to my home, and sounds as if you've done the same thing with yours. As for your Crow Woman series, where have those three been published? AHMM? I want to read those.
DeleteYep, the standalones are fun to write, too--and I'm sure we'll both continue doing that--but there's just something cool about series.
I have more standalone stories than series but, like you, there are some characters that just "demand" more screen time. My 1950s San Francisco homicide cop, Tom Keegan, is one of those (to the point that Russ Thayer and I wrote a novella, Bop City Swing, with him and Russ's serial character). I visit with him regularly, when I get tired of today's world, lol. I have a couple of others - a moody hitman, Max, although he's not always named - a middle-aged Houston PI, Harry MacLean, he's my "quirky cases" go-to guy. And there's Mae Rollins, an East Texas sheriff deputy, who's moving into book length territory. It can go the other way too, a secondary character from my PI book is making her debut in a short to be published soon... Mix and match is best!
ReplyDeleteHey Martine. Yes, some of them DO demand more time, and those are the ones that are the most fun to write about. I love your list of protagonists--it's always always better to have more than just one. Ideally, we writers should have a main character for every mood we happen to be in.
DeleteKeep mixing and matching!
I have always written stand alone stories. I'd never tried to write a sequel or series. But, with the call for Santa Rage 2 earlier this year, I deliberately wrote a sequel to my "First Contact" tale in the original Santa Rage anthology. Both the main characters are back, there is an update of where they are now, of sorts, and more. Time will tell if it gets accepted and included.
ReplyDeleteGood for you, Kevin! Sounds as if you DO write series stories after all. Yes, time will tell, but if you're enthusiastic enough about these characters to want to use them again, I suspect readers'll want to read about them over and over as well. Keep me posted!
DeleteJohn, you will smile. I've had to leave The Goddaughter series of novellas behind to write the current novel series, and I miss the characters so much! So I've started writing short stories about them. Three so far (and a relative in our Murder, Neat anthology) So you can add my condition to your list - a novelist who can't leave her novel characters behind! So they ride a second life as series short stories :)
ReplyDeleteHa! Yep, I AM smiling, Mel. Your Goddaughter cast ought to be flattered by that. And I sure do know what you mean.
DeleteAs you know, I have always admired your talent with novels, but I think one reason I love writing shorts more than the longer stuff is that with the short stories I truly *don't* have to spend much time away from certain characters and certain kinds of plots. I just bounce back and forth, after a few days or a few weeks, from one series or one kind of standalone story to another.
Thank you as always for popping in, here.
John, the first was “Dark Hollow.” Space and Time, New York, NY. Fall, 2000."
ReplyDeleteThe second was in AHMM: “At The End of the Path.” Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine, New York, NY. July/August, 2002.
And the third was 20 years later: “The Four Directions”. Black Cat Weekly #120 December 17, 2023.
Eve, I think I have that AHMM issue, someplace. I had stories in the AH issue just before that one (May/June '02) and just after (Sep/Oct) , but I think I also have the July/Aug '02 here someplace. I'll check. And I should have that issue of BCW saved also. Thanks!
DeleteA series that spans 20 years? Sounds like a couple of mine.
John, as usual, reading about your productivity leaves me in need of a nap. ;) As you know, I write both (series and standalone stories) and both (stories and novels in a series). In the Mendoza Family Saga, I wrote two short stories, then had so much more to say that I wrote two novels, then wanted to keep what I had to say about this wonderful family getting published, so I started writing short stories—and those stories were more traditional mysteries because that's the market I know best. In the Bruce Kohler Mysteries, the first short story came first because it got published before the first novel, and the short stories keep coming because I keep getting them published. As for fellow authors who write short story series, I recently read and loved Anna Scotti's collection of short stories, It's Not Even Past. Her protagonist is a former librarian and PhD candidate, now in witness protection and on the run. Most of the stories first appeared in EQMM.
ReplyDeleteLiz, I like this: "the short stories keep coming because I keep getting them published." Good for you! That's the best reason I know.
DeleteYou're already aware that I loved your Mendozas (the novels and shorts too), and I also like Steve Hockensmith's series, Rob Lopresti's Shanks stories, etc. Novelwise, I have are too many favorite series to list them all. Spenser, Reacher, Bond, Stephanie Plum, John Corey, Anna Pigeon, Virgil Cole, Hap & Leonard, Raylan Givens, etc., etc.
Keep on writing the good stuff!
I won't divulge the content of my stories here, as I'm still trying to get them published. I began writing them before my family started traveling and camping. They even started out as separate stories, but weaved them together and discovered they were greater as a whole. Writing them as a series persisted from there and it's been a joy. I've also adapted the concept to a standalone stories in a couple of other genres.
ReplyDeleteHave you thought about combining each of your series into a connected universe?
Justin
Justin, I like the fact that you took a bunch of your stories and let them evolve into a series--I wish you the very best in getting all of them published! (Be sure to mention, when you submit any of them, they they *are* part of a series--it could be a selling point. Though I'm sure you've thought of that.)
DeleteAs for my combining mine, I fear that my characters are SO different from each other I'm not sure they could share the same universe. But it's a thought!
Thanks as always for chiming in, and take care.
Thanks for the fun read, John. Excellent point on the need for series continuity, especially how folks may read only some installments. But even if your fans devour everything you write, there’s the complication of when stories get published. My first Detective Brocard story, accepted in 2021, will be published in late 2025/early 2026. Brocard also makes a supporting appearance in my story in Pulp Adventures #45, where a nearly murdered victim has lost his ability to see color. (Aside: this has far greater ramifications than just the world appearing like a black-and-white movie.) But the PA#45 story was accepted and published in 2024, making it Brocard’s debut, rather than return. If your stories share linking details, you risk spoiling the reader on something that is still moving along the publishing queue.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Dan. So far I've tried to make each of my installments/episodes as independent as I can, but now and then there are sequences of events that make a difference. The first of my Old West series had my main character meeting the woman who later became his wife, and in the second installment the two were already married, BUT I knew that the first one would be published soon so there was no problem. If you're writing a series which has already had a few installments published and you submit another story in that series to someplace like AHMM, who take a year to respond and another year to publish it after acceptance, that can be a problem if there are time-sensitive facts in the story. (For example, you might want to write and sell other episodes elsewhere in the meantime, before you even know the fate of that submission.) The whole thing can be a juggling act, but--again--if you keep your characters' life-changing events to a minimum it also minimizes the possible continuity problems. Glad you mentioned this!
DeleteMost of my short stories are standalones. I have two series. The first series involves the characters from the novel I'm writing. Last year, "Fish Eyes" appeared in Devil's Snare, and the second story, "Perfect," will be in Snakeberry this November. I didn't have trouble keeping details about my characters straight. However, the two stories are nothing alike, and they are nothing like the novel.
ReplyDeleteThe stories from the second series appeared in Black Cat Weekly last December. Again, the stories are not alike. When I was well into writing what became the second story, it dawned on me that main character had appeared before. I'm not sure any readers caught this when the stories appeared in print a couple of weeks apart. I think I have violated some command from on high about series, but I can't help it if my characters insist on behaving differently each time they appear.
I have another story coming out some time this year that involves one of my favorite characters, a charming, much loved old lady with a penchant for murder. When I tried to write another story with her, it was an absolute dud. I haven't given up hope that she'll be more cooperative the next time I attempt to bring her to life. Maybe she needs to be in the right mood to murder.
Paula, everything would be simpler if these characters would just behave and not try to go out and do things on their own. Right?
DeleteI honestly doubt if you've made a big mistake by using the same characters in stories that are different from each other. It might even make the character more interesting(!). As for readers not noticing the reappearance of a character from a former story, you might be right on that--but I'm often surprised by what readers notice that I don't *think* they'll notice. Again, it can be a juggling act. But I admire the fact that you're using the same characters in some of your stories AND your novels. Your fans should like that!
As always, I'm awed by your output. Eight mystery series? Wow. (My favorite is Lucy Valentine and Frances.)
ReplyDeleteIn my writing I write mainly standalones, but years ago I tried to follow up a published story with two more. Never got published until I self-pubbed. Not too long ago I tried to follow up a diffierent published story with a new story with the same characters. It went nowhere. Now I'm making my third attempt to follow up a published story with the "second" in a series. The first thing I did was reread the published story for the tone and some rehashing of the character's quirks and physical descriptions.
But I think I'm going to remain pretty much a standalone.
rjpetyo
Hey Bob! Good to hear from you. As for my multiple crime series, remember that some of them have only three stories each (but I promise I'm planning for more . . .).
DeleteI hope your latest attempt at a series works to your satisfaction--they *can* be fun to write. But hey, if you're having success with the standalone stories, which you are, and if you enjoy it, which you must, what does it matter? But I do like your idea for rereading a preceding story before coming back to a series, to make sure everything fits. Mistakes are easy to make, there. Again, though, precautions like that are things we never even have to worry about, with standalone stories.
Thanks as always for your thoughts.
Like others who have commented, John, reading / hearing about your output leaves me gasping for air!! LOL
ReplyDeleteI have never repeated a character (or a pair of characters), so all of my stories fall in the "standalone" category ... although some of my readers have suggested that they'd like to see a character show up in another story. But now you've certainly got me thinking about whether I should try to repeat a character! Something to ponder, and another challenge.
The pros and cons you raise a good ones, and will certainly help me consider this. Thanks as always for sharing and for your insightful thoughts!
Chuck Brownman
Chuck, I know just what you mean--I was writing for publication for six years before it ever even occurred to me to try writing a series story. (If it ain't broke, why fix it?) But, as I've said before, they are fun to write, and man, if you've had a fan or fans suggest that to you, you do need to give it a go. Something to ponder indeed.
DeletePlease keep me posted, on that!
Great post, as always, John. I've written two series of PI novels, but few short stories, just enough to agree with your advice to keep notes on names, dates, and other local geography.
ReplyDeleteZach Barnes and Woody Guthrie, who star in my two series of novels, have both appeared in novellas I wrote for the Black Orchid Novella Award.
I've published a few (very few) stories involving the local cops in those two series, too, but I generally write standalones so I don't have to check on details. I recently finished a rough draft using a PI who will appear in Michael Bracken's Flannel Fedoras collection next year, but then I realized that since that story happened 30 years ago, the PI would now be about 70, so I changed him.
Steve, I think writing a novel series is probably easier to decide to do, than deciding to write a short-story series. I think novel series are just more common and more successful, in general, than are series of shorts. But it looks as if you *have* successfully used the same characters in some novellas, and the Black Orchid Award is proof that you did it well. And I still love the fact that Woody Guthrie is a character.
DeleteKeeping up the characters' ages is just as hard with keeping up with names and places, isn't it? Unless you do as some series authors have done, and just don't allow them to age. If I recall, James Bond was still as spry in his last novel adventure as he was in his first. Amazing!
Keep doing what you're doing.