06 January 2024

Who Put the B in the BSP? (Version 2)


 

Today my post is an updated version of a column I wrote more than six years ago here at SleuthSayers, and the reasons I'm reviving it are (1) I've been reading a lot about this subject at other blogs and forums (fori?) over the past few weeks and (2) I couldn't think of anything else to post today.

Anyhow, I started my previous rant on this topic by asking this question: How blatant should self-promotion be?

It's a problem that I think has recently grown worse. Or maybe I just notice it more.

Before I get into all that, here's a definition I found long ago at the Oxford Learner's Dictionaries site: 

BSP (Blatant Self-Promotion) is the activity of making people notice you and your abilities, especially in a way that annoys other people.

Notice the last part of that sentence. Do I do that? I don't want to be annoying, and I doubt you do either. But both of us might be, if we're in the habit of saying or writing too much about accomplishments and our supposed literary talent. All of us grow weary of looking at cell phone photos of the dogs and cats and grandchildren of our friends and neighbors, right?--and you can be pretty sure they're weary of seeing ours. If that's true, how soon do they become tired of hearing, over and over, about our new novels and stories and accolades? Probably PDQ, that's how soon.

So, why do we do it? Why run the risk of angering or alienating the very people we hope might at some point read or buy our product?

One reason is, we writers are expected by our editors and publishers to do a certain amount of marketing and self-promotion. We're always being told we need to have some kind of "platform" for spreading the word, whether it's via social media, blogs, websites, newsletters, interviews, signings, speaking engagements, whatever. This is hard for some of us to do, but I suppose it's reasonable. It's our writing, after all; the publishers are just putting it out there for others to see. And unless we're already famous, nobody except friends and family are going to know or care one bit about what we've written. Somebody has to toot our horn, if it's going to get tooted.

Another reason is that self-promotion feels good, at least to the self-promoter. And it's easy to do. Talking or writing about ourselves doesn't require any effort or research. But the truth is, nobody--including my wife and kids, in my case--wants to hear too much of that. (Well, maybe my dear mother did, but mothers always do).          

Which brings us to the real question. How much BSP can we do before we go overboard, and become a total embarrassment to ourselves and our friends and family?

The answer, I think, is some but not a lot. In other words, moderation. All of us want to put our best feet forward when it comes to things like bios, press releases, book launches, etc., but we also need to use common sense. Nobody--and I mean NObody--wants to get emails, texts, tweets, etc., every day, or even every week, about the same story or book that you've written. Same thing goes for endless emails asking folks to write great reviews for you, or follow your stellar career, or vote for you in the best-novel-cover contest.

By the way, I am not innocent of BSP crimes. Example: My post here at SleuthSayers a week ago was an overview of what turned out to be a pretty good year of publishing my short stories. I also try to post a note on Facebook when new publications come out. I justify that by whining that a number of my friends have told me they like for me to do that. (It's true that they told me, but whether they were being truthful or just kind, I don't know.) Even so, I suspect those announcements are dancing dangerously close to the edges of BSP, and if I mistakenly notify folks about the same thing more than once, it fits firmly into that category. It's one of those cloudy areas of marketing/promotion that can leave you feeling guilty if you do it and guilty if you don't. 

I mentioned, a few paragraphs ago, author bios. Just a quick word, about that. A writer's bio that goes on and on and on can give editors and readers everything from glazed eyes to headaches to gastric distress, and I've often heard it said that the longer the printed bio, the less the writer has actually accomplished--the wannabe author just writes more words about less important things. There's some truth to that, and while I recognize that bios are important and necessary, it's also important not to let yourself get carried away. Even the automatic signature you place at the end of your emails can be too much. Twenty lines of text following your name and listing all your publications and awards and nominations and third-place wins in contests might be overdoing it a bit. In fact it might be eighteen or nineteen lines too long.

Same thing goes for booksignings. I'm not saying we should sit there like a petrified log all day, but it's even worse to call out to passersby like a carnival barker at the county fair, or to chase them down and pester them with questions like Do you read mysteries? or Looking for a good Christmas gift? (I have seen that done, several times.) Again, I think moderation is what works. Smile, make eye contact, maybe stand up and hand potential customers a bookmark or brochure as they walk by. But nobody likes being hounded into a purchase, whether it's a book or a used car or a pair of sneakers.

But I'm digressing. On the subject of day-to-day, writing-related BSP, I do try to post on social media any announcements of new publications and any upcoming signings--the publisher of my story collections, who's much smarter than I am on these matters, says that's a good idea, and I know that it has occasionally steered readers to those magazines or anthologies, or buyers to whatever event I'm appearing in. I think that kind of promotion makes sense--I just hope it isn't being too pushy. I realize some of the all-out blitzes people do on Facebook and elsewhere, especially regarding book releases, can get out of hand. There's a fine line between aggressive and excessive.

Author and editor Ramona DeFelice Long once said, at her blog, that writers should keep Goldilocks in mind and do what feels right. But what does feel right? Do too little, you're shy or lazy. Do too much, you're obnoxious. You're either a wallflower that nobody knows or you're an insurance salesman that nobody wants to know. 

What's an author to do?

That's the question of the day. What's your opinion? How do you, as a writer, try to do what's expected and required without being overbearing and insufferable? What are some of your personal "rules" and taboos and experiences? Also, what makes you, as a possible buyer of a piece of fiction, uncomfortable or annoyed? When does SP become BSP?


By the way, do you read a lot? Have you seen my new book? You haven't

Step right this way . . .




30 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hey Jerry! That's a relief--I'll have to change that rabbit picture.

      Delete
  2. Let's just say as long as you don't hire a hall and a band with trumpets blaring as you come in, I'm fine with it. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, dern it. I haven't paid them yet, so I guess I can cancel.

      Delete
  3. How long is a piece of string?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don’t think you do too much, John. I don’t think I do, either. I don’t have a blog or a newsletter or bookmarks. I don’t (with very occasional exceptions) announce when I’ve sold a story. I use Facebook and no other social media and announce when a new book or story is available for purchase (or, for books, pre-order). I occasionally guest at someone else’s blog (like this one, or EQMM’s “Something Is Going to Happen”). And that’s about it, really. But I’m not putting down those who do more than that. They do what works (whatever “works” means) for them, and this is what works for me….

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like Josh, I "don’t (with very occasional exceptions) announce when I’ve sold a story." The reason isn't because it would generate too much BSP (and it would), but that I've been burned so many times by periodicals that ceased publication/changed editors/changed direction, anthologies that never appeared, or stories held so long before publication that my grandchildren's grandchildren might be among the first to see it in print. I much prefer to wait until actual publication to announce anything specific.

      Delete
    2. Ha! Good reason, Michael. A friend once asked me where I had stories upcoming, and what I told her turned out to be a lie. One magazine backed out, taking my unborn story with it (though I got the rights back), and three different anthologies just never happened. You're right: wait till you see it in print before telling anyone about it. But sometimes it's a hard secret to keep . . .

      Delete
    3. John, your "Good point" was for Jim, but I'm going to chime back in to say that I think Michael also makes a good point. Announcing that I've sold a story actually seems a little desperate to me. (Again, other people's MM certainly V, and I'm not putting them down for feeling differently than I feel.) Like Michael, I have sold stories to publications that died before printing my work (The Saint Mystery Magazine, Mike Shayne's Mystery Magazine), that changed ownership before printing my work (The New Black Mask), and pretty much all the other slings and arrows that fiction is heir to. A good rule of thumb, I think, is don't BSP your chickens before they've hatched....

      Delete
    4. Makes sense, Josh. No pre-hatch announcements for me! (So, you're the one who put Mike Shayne's MM out of business, huh?)

      Seriously, you brought up something I hadn't thought of: publications do get bought out by others, and sometimes a sudden editor change can tank an accepted story as well. Lots of slings and arrows . . .

      Delete
  5. Oops. That last reply was for Jim.

    Josh, you're probably right: do what's required. I've had friends ask me things like Why didn't you tell me you were going to be signing at [wherever] last Saturday? and I then wish I'd did a better job of spreading the word. Then again, I hate posting things that some folks have no interest in. It can be a balancing act.

    ReplyDelete
  6. John, I've never noticed you slip into BSP. What you're doing in short fiction is remarkable, and I enjoy cheering it on. It's also done authentically, which seems like the key here. If the mentions come from a true--moderated--place vs. a mercenary one, then it's not BSP. It's probably not even SP. It's just S.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's kind of you, Bob. As we've said, this is a iffy subject because, even with good intentions, self-promotion can become tiresome fast. Politicians are expected to beat their own drums, but I think writers find that a lot harder to do.

      Thank you as always!

      Delete
  7. I never did announce either that something had sold because too many times the place folded or was sold and my stuff got dumped. I occasionally do it now as I rarely have a story out and the places that took it I believe will survive the experience of accepting me and publishing my story. Quite a few, over the decades, have not.

    The only thing that BSP really bugs me, beyond the twenty lines of a sig file (once saw somebody doing 35, kid you not) are the people that just hammer FB groups on a daily basis with their news of the latest book or whatever. There are several folks who do it constantly. I guess it must work for them, but as a reader, it turns me off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kevin, I can honestly say I like hearing about your successes--I wish only that you had time to write more than you do. (Sounds as if you might've jinxed as many markets as Josh and Michael and I have: sell 'em something and the publication goes belly-up.)

      The pet peeve you mentioned is one of mine also. I honestly believe that when sig lines are overly long, the reader/editor/etc. doesn't even read them. I think there's no good that can come from doing that. I'm sure some believe otherwise.

      Thank you for the input, and thanks once again for all that you do to help and support all of us who write short fiction.

      Delete
    2. It is not time, John, though that is an issue. It is a grief thing.

      Before Sandi passed, I had ideas like crazy. Mine have always come as an image or scene, something somebody said that I overheard, that sort of thing. They would spark something and I would have an idea that I could build on.

      That does not happen at all now. I can read a call and have nothing. Even after thinking about it for days and weeks, nothing magically appears in the old brain pan. I don't have images and even when I am out in public, rare occasions these days due to my health and my tendency to self isolate, nothing comes to mind at all. Deadlines come and go and I miss out because I can't get out of my own head floating in the endless grief sea.

      It is the way my life is these days. After six years, a month, and I don't know how many days, I don't think what I knew and took for granted is ever coming back.

      Delete
    3. I know, Kevin--and you're right. We never realize what's really important, and how much we take it for granted, until later.

      I still believe you'll probably get back to writing more at some point. Who knows?--some say writing is therapy.

      Best to you, always. You already have a legion of fans, in my view.

      Delete
  8. I come from the world of advertising where we placed ads, and lots of them, to reach hundreds of thousands or maybe millions of sets of eyes. So our social media efforts that reach, in my case, several hundred sets of eyes seem humble. That being said, I try to make my posts entertaining, as in pictures of friends and family reading AHMM somewhere in the wild. Because magazine distribution has been rapidly eroding over the past decades, most of those pics are set in Barnes and Noble locations. Hopefully the subjects in the pics are doing some level of shameless mugging to contribute to the fun. I recently ended a ten year run of posting "Mailbox of the Day" to both FB and Instagram which in a way inspired my "Scene (or Seen) in Barnes and Noble ..." series. I received substantial positive reinforcement that the mailbox posts were fun and looked forward to by many. So I tried to bring that kind of anticipation to my self-promotion posts. Also, I like supporting AHMM. Every day I worry that it and EQMM will be sold and the print versions ended. And although independent booksellers have long disliked B&N, these days those locations are pretty much the only places you can find those pubs, so I find myself in the position of supporting a big box chain, which seems a little odd to me. So I hope I'm not being too obnoxious with my posts, and that in the best of all possible worlds my networks look forward to the next "Seen (Scene) in ..."

    Email are another thing. I limit myself to one email blast for each published piece.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you, Floyd--that sounds like an effective marketing plan, to me. And I so agree on supporting those magazines, and the stores that sell them.

      Love to get "hints" like these from marketing professionals. All I ever sold was computers, so what do I know.

      As for emails, I've never used it much in terms of BSP, so I didn't mention it in this post. FB and our great little Short Mystery Fiction Society group (which is still great but isn't so little anymore) are the only two "media" I use in announcing published stories, etc.

      Thanks for the insights!

      Delete
  9. I'm delighted to find a virtue in my laziness. That said, I don't find anything you do, John, excessive, except perhaps for writing and publishing so many stories in a year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How kind of you, Susan. As I mentioned to someone on Facebook earlier, it's so hard to know if we're overdoing it when we "announce" new publications, etc.--you know what I mean. As for writing and publishing stories, that's a matter of hills and valleys--I probably have some deep and dry valleys in my future after this past hilly year.

      Thanks for stopping in, here! Stay in touch.

      Delete
  10. Brian Silverman08 January, 2024 13:00

    The great Jimmy Breslin said, "If you don't toot your own horn, there is no music." My problem is I always think my music just isn't good enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or too loud, right, Brian? That's always what I'm afraid of. That kind of thing's hard to judge, when we're talking about our own actions. Writers always seem to suffer from self-doubt--I admit to it.

      Delete
  11. Promotion is half the game, John! I post stuff on my (too many!) social media sites (under three different names!!!) for my own publications and those of friends of mine (and for anyone who asks!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeff, it might be half the game, but it's sure not the fun half--right?

      Three different names?! I cause quite enough trouble with only one.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, it's when I post promo that I stare at the screen and say "I have THAT many social media sites?!?!" As for the three names (Skip Hanford and Mike Mayak being the other two) when I got married the Judge asked us if we were going to change our last names and I said "I write under three different names. I've confused enough people!"

      Delete
    3. What confuses me is how you came up with your pseudonyms. Was it difficult? I think I'd have a tough time deciding on a different name . . .

      Delete
    4. Not difficult at all! For "Mike Mayak" the first name was something I've been called for a few decades and I saw "Mayak" in USA Today as the name of a bar in Russia where they were watching the Olympics and I liked it. As for "Skip Hanford," that was a name I threw together for a story I never finished. Wasn't going to use it or me but then I was having stuff rejected from a magazine the next day I sent it in so I wondered if it was me? (It wasn't me.) Anyway I use the "Skip" name for stuff that is PG-13...

      Delete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>