18 May 2024

From MM to WW


  

So far this month, the publication gods have been kind to me--at least with magazines. Not long ago at this blog, I mentioned that most of my stories these days were being written for anthologies. As soon as I would start writing a story to try at AHMM, EQMM, Strand, etc., I'd either see a tempting anthology submission call or I'd get an invitation from an editor to contribute to an antho, and off I would go in that direction instead. I doubt I'm the only one who does that. There's something appealing to many of us about writing stories for themed anthologies--they're not only fun, they're challenging. Also, if an editor is kind enough to invite me, I hate to say no. I think I've had to do it only once, and that was hard.

For the past few weeks, though, my stories have all been in magazines. And before you say Yeah, they came out around the same time, but you wrote and submitted them long ago . . . well, no, I didn't. All of these stories were written, submitted, and accepted recently. The truth is, it reminds me a bit of the old days, when magazines were pretty much the only markets out there for short fiction, or at least short mysteries. Anthology sightings were rare. (Either that, or I never knew about them.)

The three stories I'm talking about were published this month in Mystery Magazine, Strand Magazine, and Woman's World, all of which have been good to me for the past several years. (Counting my blessings, here.) In case you don't happen to see these issues but are interested in the kinds of mysteries those publications are currently running, here's a quick summary of each of mine.


Ravines, machines, and magazines

The first of those three stories, "Bad Eagle Road," appeared in Mystery Magazine's May 1 issue. It's a 2700-word cross-genre mystery set in the Pacific Northwest, about a team of anthropologists and biologists in search of Bigfoot. Recent sightings and evidence have pointed them to an area of caves and hollows that, unfortunately for them, has also been targeted by a group of wealthy and ruthless land developers much more interested in financial profit than scientific discoveries and the delays and inconvenience they might cause. But a discovery does happen when the team hikes to the site, in the form of a deadly encounter, and as a result, one of the monster-hunters who survives it winds up being hunted himself, by both man and beast. This story was fun to write because it's a mix of adventure, crime, and fantasy. Many thanks to editor Kerry Carter, by the way, who published it.


Next was another unusual kind of mystery, at least for me. It's called "Pushing Joe Carter," in the Spring 2024 issue of Strand Magazine. This one's set on the West Coast, and it's around 2300 words. It involves a prisoner convicted of murder and sentenced to death, which sadly isn't all that unusual. What is different is that this man, one Joseph Carter, has been selected to be the first person executed via a new and innovative method. The device to be used is a huge three-sided box installed at the edge of a cliff above the ocean, into which the condemned prisoner will be placed. Once he's inside, the rear wall of the compartment (nicknamed The Pusher) will be hydraulically moved forward, eventually forcing him out the open side and onto the rocks far below. The waves will take care of the cleanup, and the outcome is quicker and more certain than with any of the usual non-mechanical methods. A final appeal to the governor for a stay of execution has fallen short, and as the hour of Carter's death approaches and new evidence emerges of his possible innocence, his female lawyer continues to try to find a way to rescue him. I had a great time coming up with the plot on this one because it is so off-beat. Thanks as always to Strand editor Andrew Gulli for publishing the story. It's my fifth in a row, there.


The last of the three is "Guessing Games," another of my mini-mysteries for Woman's World, featuring southern small-town sheriff Charles "Chunky" Jones and his former schoolteacher Angela Potts. In this installment of the series, the sheriff and his bossy sidekick are trying to keep from bickering long enough to figure out a vague clue spoken by the dazed victim of a mugging before she was wheeled into the hospital for treatment. That sole lead to the attacker's identity--that he resembled the host of an old TV game show--is odd enough to seem impossible to solve, but--surprise, surprise!--Angela manages to do it. The question is, can the reader solve it as well? As some of you know, I've been lucky enough to sell a lot of these lighthearted mysteries to Woman's World over the years, and even though I suspect that my idea generator will one day run out of gas, that doesn't seem to have happened yet. I owe thanks to WW editors Maggie Dillard and Sienna Sullivan for publishing this one--the stories are always loads of fun to write. "Guessing Games" is in the May 20 issue, but has already appeared on newsstands. For those who're wondering, the on-sale date at WW is always eleven days before the issue date.

Questions

How about you? Have you found yourself publishing more in one kind of market lately, than another? Are you cutting back on your submissions to magazines because of the recent boom in (and demand for) anthologies? Which do you prefer? In the magazine market, which ones of those are your favorite targets for submissions? Are you sticking mostly to mysteries, or venturing occasionally into other genres? Anybody writing stories that involve no crime at all? How about cross-genre fiction, that mixes them up in the same story? Let me know in the comments.


So, that's that. If you happen to read any of these three stories, I hope you'll like 'em.

My next post will be more about writing than publishing: I'll preach about some steps in creating effective titles.

See you then.


18 comments:

  1. Way to go, John! Love to hear about your successes. Being far (galaxies away) less prolific thank you, I find my self mixing genres. Answering a call for pirate stories, for example, II wrote a pirate, ghost, crime story. The pirate story was accepted. Had it not been, I could have sold it as horror or mystery.

    Looking forward to your next post.
    Edward Lodi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Edward! I think I saw that anthology call for pirate stories--I bet that WAS fun, and congrats on the sale.

      Yep, writing cross-genre stories has several advantages--it not only appeals to more readers, it can be submitted to more than one kind of market. Even after acceptance! If a crime magazine or anthology buys it, maybe it can be reprinted in a horror market, etc.

      Thank you as always for stopping in.

      Delete
  2. Spring has been good to me. A story of mine was published this week. In the next 30 days or so, I'll be in another magazine, and in June, one of my science fiction stories will appear in an anthology based on the music of Jetro Tull. I could get used to this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Darn right, Mike. It's a good feeling.

      Congrats on both stories! I saw the call for the Jethro anthology--if I remember, that one wasn't long ago, so publication'll be fast if it's coming out next month. Keep up the good writing!

      Delete
  3. John, that's very interesting - yes, I find myself writing almost exclusively for anthologies now. I *love* being in books with other writers I know. It's almost festive, if you know what I mean! (And I'm sure you do.) It's an honour to be asked to submit. Melodie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Melodie--you're right, part of the fun of being in an anthology is that you're one of a group of writers, most of whom you probably already know. And yes, it is an honor to be invited. The only bad thing about it is that you always want to say yes, and that can be tough at times.

      By the way, I loved your interview in the Queen's University magazine!

      Thanks for the thoughts. Stay in touch!

      Delete
    2. Why, how very kind of you to read that interview, John! I think they were a little tired of doing the 'White Male Makes Good on Wall Street" type features (they hinted as much) and I was a spot of comic relief. Still, it was an honour. I don't often get to be truthful (wink) Melodie

      Delete
    3. It was great, Melodie, and funny too. Loved it.

      Delete
  4. John, again you've helped me understand this 'writer's schizophrenia'. Back and forth I've gone, a call from an anthology editor, an interesting plot running in my head, a book that needs a little more editing. Maybe I was born to be a juggler, not a writer. I'm behind on clearing my desk, ahead on the number of submissions, behind on responses, ahead for the first quarter on acceptances. Five days away from the computer and I thought I'd eaten ice cream and had permanent brain freeze. At any rate, I like your style, your record of success. Inspirational. I'll stumble along and take the medication perscribed: 'Keep Writing', q. daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's good medication to take!

      Yes, this business/hobby/pastime IS a juggling act. But I like to hear that you're ahead on acceptances, and submissions too. I love submitting a story--it starts a tingle of anticipation that lingers until you hear something back, good or bad, and the feeling you get at acceptance time never gets old. I don't even mind rejections anymore--I just send the rejected story someplace else and send a new story to the place that rejected me. It's an addiction, I know, but a good one.

      Thanks for the comment.

      Delete
  5. A three-fer--way to go! I think I've said this before, but, once again, I want to be you when I grow up. Or maybe in a next life, if I never grow up in this one. CONGRATS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How kind of you, Kaye--thank you. (You wouldn't want to be me if you saw all my rejection letters. I conveniently didn't mention those . . .)

      Delete
  6. I second Kaye's wish to be you at some point, John! Can we have more than one of you at a time?
    Congrats on the multiple publications. Well deserved!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Chuck. There are always ups and downs with this stuff--I was serious when I said I've just been fortunate lately, with these magazines. I try to remember the high spots when the dry spells come along. Take care, and keep in touch!

      Delete
  7. Congrats on being a triple threat!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Justin! I know you said you're writing a lot lately--good luck with your submissions.

      Delete
  8. Pat Marinelli19 May, 2024 13:16

    John, just finished reading you WW story. Wow, did that bring back a lot of memories! It also made me think about all those MCs on those shows. The blackboard clue gave me the answer.

    Funny sideline. My uncle, who was a set designer and stage manage for TV and Broadway in that time period, appeared on the show that was the answer. (Don't want to give anything away for those who haven't read it yet.) Of course, he was the wrong guy. We knew that when we watched the show. lol Thanks for a great story and bringing back many memories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you liked it, Pat! I've found myself watching some episodes of that show on YouTube lately.

      Especially pleased to hear that you solved the puzzle but still liked it. That's the best of all worlds. I'm always disappointed if I hear that someone either thought it was too hard or too easy.

      Delete

Welcome. Please feel free to comment.

Our corporate secretary is notoriously lax when it comes to comments trapped in the spam folder. It may take Velma a few days to notice, usually after digging in a bottom drawer for a packet of seamed hose, a .38, her flask, or a cigarette.

She’s also sarcastically flip-lipped, but where else can a P.I. find a gal who can wield a candlestick phone, a typewriter, and a gat all at the same time? So bear with us, we value your comment. Once she finishes her Fatima Long Gold.

You can format HTML codes of <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and links: <a href="https://about.me/SleuthSayers">SleuthSayers</a>