02 April 2018

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Truth About Villains

by Steve Liskow

Superman isn't a hero because he can fly or see through walls or bend steel with his bare hands. He's a hero because of kryptonite, the element that will render him helpless. That's how it is in mystery writing, too.

If you're writing a crime or mystery story, the villain drives your plot. Without a strong opponent, your hero looks weak because he or she doesn't really face a challenge. That's bad.

So how do you make your villain strong?

Remember, your Bad Guy explores alternatives, stepping over the line into the darkness to get something he or she wants, by whatever means necessary. If those means include lying, stealing, or killing, so much the better. The villain's goal is usually money, love, or power, and those are the issues that give your story high stakes. Without stakes, who cares?

The more your villain influences the story, the better. The hero/sleuth has to meet the increasingly difficult challenges.

That's comparatively easy in suspense novels that use the Bad Guy's point of view for some scenes. Suspense stories seem to be getting bigger and bigger now, and Armageddon needs a full-scale Ming the Merciless (Yeah, I'm dating myself)
to carry the ball. Sometimes those stories present the Bad Guy as a monster. Don't TELL us your character is a monster, though, a Joker, Snidely Whiplash, or Hannibal Lector, SHOW us. He has to be willing to kill dozens of people, dance with glee over starving kittens and scheme to bring back Disco.
He doesn't have to wring his hands and cackle "Bwah-hah-hah, my pretty" whenever we see him, and he doesn't need a pet cobra or a bullwhip. But we like to see someone enjoy his work and take pride in it. My favorite line in the entire Batman series is Heath Ledger as the Joker proclaiming, "When you're very good at something, never do it for free."

The best Bad Guys have redeeming qualities, too. They have a good reason (to them) for what they do. Revenge for a dead sibling or child, pursuit of a cause they believe is noble, a cure for tone-deafness. And except for some bloodthirsty little peccadillo, they may be great people. Hannibal Lector has superb taste and a sense of humor. In the early James Bond films, Blofeld often cradled a white Persian cat. If he likes animals, how bad can e really be? Well, come to think of it...

That's suspense. In mysteries, we can't be that obvious. We want the reader to wonder who the Bad Guy is. My villains seem like ordinary people until we discover why they do those nasty things. But my Bad Guys (or gals, I have several of them--I love subtle femme fatales) keep the squirrel running on the treadmill.

In Who Wrote the Book of Death? Zach Barnes is trying to find the person who threatens Beth Shepard.
Beth is the visible half of a writing team, and Barnes isn't sure if she's the target or if the Bad Guy really wants to kill Jim Leslie, who writes under a female pen name. He spends lots of time looking at both peoples' backstory to see who might want to kill them. In the meantime, Leslie nearly gets electrocuted in his own home. The killer tampers with the wiring, but nobody sees him. Beth is almost run down, but nobody gets a good look at the car. Later, someone shoots at her while she's presenting an author event at a bookstore, and nobody sees the shooter.

The villain is hiding, but his work drives the story. Even though we haven't seen him, Barnes must scramble to protect both people and figure out who the heck is doing all this stuff.

In The Whammer Jammers, several characters have nasty agendas. Someone stalks a roller derby skater, someone plans a bank robbery, and someone sets fires to a geriatric hospital, but we don't know who is pulling all the strings until Trash and Byrne solve those cases and find the common denominator...in the very last scene.

Blood On the Tracks revolves around a cold case that comes to light when Woody Guthrie agrees to recover a missing audio tape of a 1991 recording session. Someone killed a man to steal that tape, and Guthrie has to figure out why a recording of a long-forgotten band matters that much. The tape is what Alfred Hitchcock used to call a "MacGuffin," the gizmo that drives the plot, but the killer and his reasons are real. Guthrie has to understand how a twenty-years-old death links to three violent deaths in the present. That's a lot of influence by an invisible Bad Guy.

I put all these villains in plain sight and have them behave like decent people because I want to play fair with the reader. I give him or her information to unravel the mystery along with my detective, but I don't make my villain a weirdo or a demon or a cartoon. He or she is simply a person like you or me (But not as handsome or beautiful)
who made a really bad choice. Maybe that's what fascinates me the most about villains. Not all of them are monsters. There's a place for those, too, but it's not in my particular stories.

Unfortunately, opening the morning newspaper reminds me that we have enough monsters out there in real life.

7 comments:

Paul D. Marks said...

I agree, Steve, that it's best not to make your villain too over the top. Nothing scarier than the normal looking guy down the block who spends his nights trolling for victims.

janice law said...

Lots of good points. Probably it reveals something about my psyche, but I have always found evil easier to write than good. Real unsentimental goodness in a character is, to my mind, the trickiest thing in literature.

O'Neil De Noux said...

Your article is right on. I agree the larger the villain, the more danger for the hero and a fully developed villain is far more intriguing. Haven't done a lot of that in my writing. Maybe I should. Good lesson.

Steve Liskow said...

Janice, I agree that "unsentimental goodness" is very hard to do. Goody Two-Shoes tends to get cloying or boring or both. I still remember my wife's comment about a Victorian lit class years ago, in which she had to read Eliot's Middlemarch. "I figured out right away that Dorothea was the protagonist, and she bored the hell out of me...and there were over 500 pages to go."

O'Neil, I won't say it's easy because NOTHING in writing is easy, but people fascinate me, so I tend to look more a character, sometimes at the expense of plot. More often than not, WHY someone does something interests me more than the how. It can be a problem.

BYT, thanks again for all your hard work putting together the Femme Fatale Bundle and including me.

Eve Fisher said...

"Unsentimental goodness" - try Anthony Trollope's Mr. Harding, Eleanor Harding, Archdeacon Grantly (all from Barchester Towers). Or try Charlotte Yonge's brood of children (who do not all turn out well) in either "The Daisy Chain" (which is by no means as saccharine as the title sounds) or "The Pillars of the House". Both Trollope and Yonge were masters at creating heros/heroines who were good, but unsentimental with it and with actual faults and flaws. In other words, humans.

Frankly, most villains that are presented for our entertainment bore me. Too often they're perfect villains, always 1-25 steps ahead of everyone else. (Until they make that tiny little mistake that lets the "master" detective catch them.) Actually, my favorite villains are Count Fosco (The Woman in White); on the screen, Basil Rathbone in "We're No Angels" and Alistair Sim in "Scrooge". These are all guys who loved their work, and not much is gonna stop them...

Leigh Lundin said...

I do like a good bad guy! It's instructive how the quality and popularity of the James Bond series hinges upon the bad guy. Not long ago, I mentioned admiring the bad guy in Day of Wrath… a complex character.

Robert Lopresti said...

I LOVE your line about Superman. Good piece.